“Prof. Unruh, Shut up!": MCC’s "Dutch Strategy," 1946

Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) had hoped to get their refugees into The Netherlands for months. With the support of the Dutch Mennonites in 1946, MCC officials worked to convince the new post-war Dutch government and the International Refugee Organization (IRO) that these refugees were not technically Soviet Germans or Volksdeutsche (ethnic naturalized Germans), but of Dutch origin.

MCC's C.F. Klassen argued, not without stretching the facts, that these Mennonites only became German citizens during the war under duress, and that “naturalization had been conducted in a coercive environment” (note 1).

MCC’s “Dutch strategy” was shorthand for a complex story. As one refugee remembered: “We were [naturalized] German citizens, but … MCC claimed that we were refugees and that German citizenship papers had been forced on us, and on that basis they considered us ‘Staatenlos’, without a country. We all came in under that” (note 2).

This was the narrative that was used later in Canada as well: “And we usually say our ancestors came from the Netherlands—I mean to people who don’t know about Mennonites … Oh, that was used to get us into Canada, of course, so it was very practical, but before that nobody really talked about Dutch ancestry” (note 3).

These memories are anecdotal. But MCC’s applications reflected “the emotional and spiritual state of the refugees” (note 4). And it was the case that the Yalta Agreement made all certificates of naturalization issued by the National Socialist regime null and void. The Soviet Union agreed: they were not “German” citizens, but Soviet.

The influential Amsterdam Mennonite pastor Tjeerd Hylkema paved the political way into Holland and welcomed the Russian Mennonites as “our people,” “‘pure’ members of ‘Dutch stock,’ and a ‘true example of old Dutch virtue and resilience’” (note 5).

For German Mennonite leader Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh, however, it was a faulty conclusion and called into question his life work. According to Unruh the “germanization” of Dutch-German Mennonites was complete as early as 1750, some four decades before migration to Russia (note 6). Mennonites were not unlike the Protestant French Huguenots (using the racial categories of the 1930s) who had been absorbed into Prussian society two hundred years earlier: a “person of a similar (stammesgleicher) racial origin, who himself or his ancestors have been absorbed into the German peoplehood,” and as such belonging to the Volk, but with a unique ancestry (note 7).

MCC needed to distance itself from Unruh (formerly on MCC’s payroll), whose very close relationships with the Nazis before and throughout the war years had raised serious concerns. He was now seen as a liability in MCC’s negotiations with British and American occupation forces (note 8). In a 1945 Memorandum MCC director Peter Dyck wrote:

"[Many] of our people have had to accept the Volksdeutsche Ansiedler Pass in 1943. … [Our] friend Prof. Unruh insists all our people to be ‘gute Deutsche’ (good Germans) … [I]f the military authorities happen to come to this same conclusion, which they have not, then we may as well pack our suitcases and go home because there will be no emigration for quite some time." (Note 9)

Ted D. Regehr’s research shows that IRO officials did not really believe the claims advanced by senior MCC officials that the Mennonite refugees from the Soviet Union were really persons of Dutch ancestry. Nonetheless, they initially continued to process the refugees for relief and immigration assistance under pressure from American officials and in order to expedite the refugee problem in postwar Europe.

Regehr suggests that while the competing claims of MCC and the IRO were both true in some respects, those cherished values of truth and honesty “may appear differently to people in complex, difficult and morally ambiguous situations” (note 10).

Peter Letkemann (Winnipeg) also sides with Unruh, and bluntly calls MCC’s claims to a remote and obscure ancestry a Notlüge, a lie of necessity, required by the emergency situation (note 11).

Only 437 "Menno Passes" were actually issued before the Soviet Union exerted enough pressure on the Dutch government to completely close the door on Mennonite immigrants from the Soviet Union.

A year later when refugees in Germany applied to leave for Paraguay and had to face a political commission that included Soviet members, “we answered all the questions in a manner that was necessary to obtain permission to emigrate. Everyone knew that these were lies, and yet things went without a hitch …," according to P. Derksen, later Oberschulze in Neuland, Paraguay (note 12).

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

----Notes----

Note 1: Gerhard Rempel, “Cornelius Franz Klassen: Rescuer of the Mennonite Remnant, 1894–1954,” in Shepherds, Servants and Prophets: Leadership Among the Russian Mennonites (ca. 1880–1960), edited by Harry Loewen, 193–228 (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2003), 199.

Note 2: “Focus group: Fluechtlinge,” in Cynthia A. Jones, “Grounding Diaspora in Experience: Niagara Mennonite Identity” (PhD dissertation, Wilfrid Laurier University, 2010), 325, https://scholars.wlu.ca/etd/1099/.

Note 3: Ibid., 324f.

Note 4: Ted Regehr, “Anatomy of a Mennonite Miracle: The Berlin Rescue of 30–31 January 1947,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 9 (1991), 11–33; 18, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/326/326.

Note 5: T. Hylkema, Fredeshiem, cited in G. Homan, “‘We have come to love them’: Russian Mennonite Refugees in the Netherlands, 1945–1947,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 25 (2007), 39–59; 43, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/1223/1215.

Note 6: Cf. Ted D. Regehr, “Of Dutch or German Ancestry? Mennonite Refugees, MCC and the International Refugee Organization,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 13 (1995), 7–25, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/441/441; and Benjamin Unruh, “Praktische Fragen,” Der Bote (January 20, 1937), 1f. In the first part of Unruh’s mammoth self-published post-war research (Niederländisch-niederdeutschen Hintergründe), he argues with passion and length for the predominantly east Frisian—i.e., German—origins of Prussian / Russian Mennonites. Nazi promoter Heinrich Hajo Schröder argued in 1937—with reference to his one-time teacher and collaborator Benjamin Unruh—that the term “Holländer” was simply short-hand for Frisian farmers who lived under Dutch nobility—making the designation “Dutch” misleading and wholly “unscientific” (Rußlanddeutsche Friesen [Döllstädt-Langensalza: Self-published, 1936], 3f., https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1936,%20Schroeder,%20Russlanddetusche%20Friesen/).

Note 7: “Gemeinschaft des Blutes,” Ukraine Post, no. 5 (February 6, 1943), 4. No author given. 06.02.1943, Issues «Ukraine Post» - LIBRARIA - Ukrainian periodicals archive online.

Note 8: Cf. Albert Keim, Harold S. Bender, 1887–1962 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1998), 394, https://archive.org/details/haroldsbender1890000keim; MCC agreed to share in a modest monthly allowance and pension plan for B. H. Unruh in 1948, “primarily for living but also for research purposes” (John Unruh, In the Name of Christ: A History of the Mennonite Central Committee and its Service 1920–1951 [Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1952], 355 n.1). At the time of the Nuremberg Trials, Unruh purportedly destroyed a large number of potentially incriminating documents (Letter, David G. Rempel to Lawrence Klippenstein December 2, 1988, 2 in David G. Rempel Papers, Box 6, File 6 (Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON); and Letter, David G. Rempel to John D. Thiesen, July 30, 1990, 3.

Note 9: “Memorandum on Mennonite Refugees in Germany, July 25, 1945,” cited by Krista Taves, “Reunification of Russian Mennonites,” Ontario Mennonite History XIII, no. 1 (March 1995), 1–7; 5, http://www.mhso.org/sites/default/files/publications/Ontmennohistory13-1.pdf.

Note 10: Regehr, “Anatomy of a Mennonite Miracle," 19. “The hard facts of the case were that IRO researchers and officials were closer to the truth as revealed in the surviving German documents than the disclaimers in the various MCC documents.”

Note 11: Peter Letkemann, “Nachwort,” in Fügungen und Führungen: Benjamin Heinrich Unruh, 1881–1959, by H. B. Unruh, 361–447 (Detmold, 2009), 427.

Note 12: P. Derksen, cited in Peter P. Klassen, Mennonites in Paraguay, vol. 1: Kingdom of God and Kingdom of this World, trans. G. H. Schmitt (Hillsboro, KS: Self-published, 2004), 114f.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “‘Prof. Unruh, Shut up!’: MCC’s ‘Dutch Strategy,’ 1946,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 11, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/prof-unruh-shut-up-mccs-dutch-strategy.html.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog