Skip to main content

"Women Talking" -- and Canadian Mennonites

In March 2023 the film "Women Talking" won an Oscar for "Best adapted Screenplay." It was based on the novel of the same name by Mennonite Miriam Toews. The conservative Mennonites portrayed in the film are from the "Manitoba Colony" in Bolivia--with obvious Canadian connections.

Now that many Canadians have seen the the film, Mennonites like me are being asked, "So how are you [in Markham-Stouffville, Waterloo or in St. Catharines] connected to that group?" Most would say, "We're not that type of Mennonite." And mostly that is a true answer, though unnuanced. Others will say, "Well, it is complex," but they can't quite unfold the complexity. 

Below is my attempt to do just that. At the heart of the story are things that happened in Ukraine (at the time "New" or "South" Russia) over 200 years ago.

It is not easy to rebuild the influence and contribution of "Russian Mennonite" women and their un-minuted "talking" (and for the record, they were talking in Low German dialect, not Russian or Ukrainian).

My way of access is Johann Funk, b. 1836, the "elder" (=bishop) of the conservative Mennonite Bergthal Colony in southern Manitoba from 1882 and 1911. The colony was named after their colony of the same name in Ukraine. I want to suggest that the “talk” of his mother (Margaretha Breyel, 1805–1889)—a daughter, sister, aunt and great aunt of multiple school teachers—was in part to “blame” or "praise" for the Manitoba "Mennonite Gretna School Controversy" which split the Bergthalers in the 1890s. This will to understand the roots of the community and their conflicts in the film.


There are two good biographical articles that piece together Johann's life story (note 1). Not surprisingly there is nothing written about his mother. Margaretha is first mentioned in the 1808 Russian Census (note 2; pic). Her father Jacob Breyel (also my ancestor) was listed as a farmer, 36 years old, living in the village of Burwalde (very close to today's Zaporizhzhia), with wife Margaretha, age 35 with six children ages twelve to nine months old. The next census of 1811 lists her father as “schoolteacher” in this village of 33 families (note 3). Jacob Breyel is the only Mennonite schoolteacher mentioned in the entire 1811 census, and apparently the first in any Mennonite (Chortitza Colony) document. With other pioneers to "New Russia," he had left Prussia as a 16-year-old after Catherine the Great cleared what is today south Ukraine of Indigenous Nogai/Tatar peoples. Breyel was young enough to have been compelled to complete a modernized German Prussian education—and thus better qualified to teach than most older than he.


A “progressive” conservative family? Perhaps. We know Margaretha was vaccinated for smallpox in 1809 as a four-year-old, together with most children in their Chortitza Colony (some of her conservative descendants would be shocked; note 4).

When Margaretha’s father died about 1813, her 10-year-old brother Jacob was sent to live with their mother’s brother in the village of Einlage. Around the same time, the Lutheran educator Heinrich Heese married into Einlage and became Mennonite. Hesse would become the most progressive and important Mennonite teacher in Chortitza and the other Mennonite colony, Molotschna. He was Prussian trained and also known to be a “walking Russian dictionary.”

Margaretha’s brother became Heese's protégé, no doubt with family approva. He (Jacob Bräul) would later leave Chortitza for Molotschna with Heese where they both took up teaching positions ca. 1828—the one in Ohrloff, and the other in Rudnerweide. Both communities were "progressive," and both teachers introduced Russian into the German-language curriculum (note 5).

Back to 1814: Margaretha’s widowed mother married 66-year-old Peter Mantler of Nieder Chortitza—23 years her senior (note 6); Margaretha was about 8. It is unclear when this stepfather died.
At some point, Margaretha Breyel left Nieder Chortitza and moved to her brother Jacob’s Molotschna village of Rudnerweide where she married. A 1836 document shows that Margaretha and her husband Peter Funk applied to the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers to move from Rudnerweide back to Nieder Chortitza (note 7).

As mentioned, it is complex and we will try not to get lost in weeds of genealogy.

Notably Rudnerweide was from the more progressive "Frisian" Mennonite group, and more “Prussian” and Pietist than the majority "Flemish" Mennonite settlers in Molotschna were comfortable with. Peter Funk's family arrived with others from Prussia to settle Rudnerweide in 1819—30 years after Margaretha's father arrived in Russia. Funk came as a 19-year-old, i.e., he was socialized as a Prussian. Their eldest child, Margaretha, b. 1827, would have been educated later by her uncle Jacob Bräul in Rudnerweide.

In 1830, the "Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers in New Russia" considered only eight of 116 teachers in the two larger regions of Katerynoslav and Tauria—which included the Molotschna—fit to teach; Bräul’s schoolhouse was given the same status as Heese’s Ohrloff Agricultural Society School with regard to policies for “proposed intermediate schools,” and “especially for the teaching of Russian” (note 8 ).

Meanwhile in Nieder Chortitza, the community still rejected spelling and reading charts as spiritually harmful and leading away from the Mennonite faith—as late as 1847 (note 9). Already by the late 1830s the differences in education were become sharper.

Nevertheless, in 1836 Margarethe and her husband Peter Funk had applied to transfer back from Rudnerweide to Nieder Chortitza. Why? Her mother was still living (age 63); and here Margaretha gave birth to her son Johann, the future Bergthal elder. Importantly, they were landless and here they qualified with other Chortitza landless folk for settlement in the new Chortitza daughter colony of Bergthal (near today's Mariupol), located 100 kilometres east of the Molotschna.

Though Johann Funk grew up in Bergthal—known for very conservative attitudes towards education—it is inconceivable that Margaretha and Peter Funk would adopt a conservative approach to education for their household and their children.

In the 1870s, then Bergthal Elder Gerhard Wiebe and his community were among the most suspicious of the broad Russian state reforms of the early 1870s, and rightfully feared the prospect that Mennonites might have to do military service (the main reason they left Prussia for Russia). Wiebe was not only convinced that Christian non-resistance was an “apostolic teaching,” but he was also a conservative with regard to education. Wiebe argued that the school’s primary function is as handmaiden of the church, to prepare children for responsible church membership. Higher education—indeed, any materials other than the Bible, even the picture book readers recommended by government officials—could destroy community values and bring confusion within the church, just “as it did in the fourth century” when Christianity changed from being the faith of martyrs and became the religion of the Empire (note 10).

The concern was to “protect and save” their children not only from military service, but also from “religious decline” and the “nightfall upon Christendom.” The whole colony was convinced that “no other way remained but to emigrate” (note 11), and the entire 500-family, 2,833-person colony—two-thirds of whom were landless—chose to transplant itself to Canada.

The Funk and Wiebe families were among some 600 Bergthalers who had arrived in Quebec City on July 1, 1875 (note 12; pic). An earlier group arrived in 1874 and wintered with “Swiss Mennonites” in Ontario. In the spring of 1875 they were escorted to Manitoba by Markham Mennonite saw- and gristmill proprietor Simeon Reesor —a cousin to the influential senator in the new Canadian government, David Reesor. On July 6, 1875, Aaron Schantz (Kitchener-Waterloo) took the 600 newly arrived Russian Mennonites from Toronto by rail via Sarnia, Detroit, Chicago, St. Paul and Moorehead (note 13); from there they went by steamer on the Red River to Winnipeg (note 14), in “search of utopia,” in the words of sociologist E. K. Francis (note 15).


Margaretha Breyel Funk’s son Johann became Elder/Bishop of the Bergthalers seven years later (1882). He was soon embroiled in government-initiated school reforms and he encouraged his community to support the creation of a government compliant Mennonite teacher-training institute. Notably Canadian educationalists were looking closely at the Prussian system as they developed their own!

Funk was attacked by conservative forces within the church who considered him and his allies—like Franz Kliewer, b. 1845, a one-time student of Funk’s Rudnerweide uncle—to be “in the service of evil” (note 16).

At this same time in South Russia (Ukraine), Funk’s first-cousin Johann Bräul—a pioneering teacher in his own right—and his university-trained son J. J. Bräul--were transforming education among Russian Mennonites (note 17). It is not a stretch to think that Funk’s mother Margaretha still corresponded with her two teacher-nephews and a great nephew in Molotschna, where her maiden name had become synonymous with progressive education.

Margaretha lived until 1889, the year that the Normal School (later known as Mennonite Educational Institute) opened at Gretna, Manitoba. It is easy to imagine that Margaretha's voice, memory, and passion shaped her son's vision and engagement for education and teacher training, and that at least indirectly she was behind the Manitoba Mennonite School Controversy (E.g., If in Russia her brother could introduce Russian into the curriculum, why shouldn't Mennonites in Manitoba also learn English and take guidance from the state for educational reform? Also: Girls were always educated equal to the boys in Mennonite schools--critical for an informed decision for adult baptism)

The controversy in Manitoba did not end in 1889, but "came to a head in January 1892 during a series of meetings which Funk called to discuss the issue. The result was a schism in the Bergthaler church” (note 18). Some 415 of the 476 families in the Bergthal Church on Manitoba's West Reserve rejected Funk’s leadership and separated to form the Sommerfeld Mennonite Church. This led to Funk’s eventual resignation as elder in 1911 (the group in the movie in Bolivia today include Sommerfelder).

The school controversy also split Funk’s family. His son-in-law Bernhard J. Toews was a well-known Mennonite educator in the Manitoba Sommerfeld community and was imprisoned in 1920 after the Public School Act banned private schools in Manitoba. He and his wife refused to send their children to the public schools. One year later he was sent by his community to explore new settlement opportunities in Paraguay and Mexico and make arrangements for a mass migration of Mennonites out of Canada.

His children, together with other descendants of Margaretha Breyel Funk immigrated to Paraguay in 1926/7 (and later Bolivia). They unwittingly opened the way to Paraguay for later Mennonite refugee groups seeking to escape Stalin's Soviet Union in 1929/30, as well as post-WW2 refugees. Among the latter group was a "formidable" secondary school educator and long-lost cousin, Fräulein Marg Bräul (note 19)--and my mother Käthe Bräul.

I would argue that Margaretha Breyel Funk was a “talker” and responsible for at least one important schism. She was likely a woman who had the ear of many other women in her circle—both progressive and conservative, and she was a "mother" of both.

But it's complex!

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1
: Lawrence Klippenstein, “Ältester Johann Funk (1836–1917),” in Church, Family and Village: Essays on Mennonite Life on the West Reserve, edited by Adolf Ens, Jacob E. Peters and Otto Hamm, 213–339 (Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba Mennonite Historical Society, 2001); idem, “Funk, Johann,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online (University of Toronto/Université Laval, 2003), http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/funk_johann_14E.html.
Note 2: Benjamin H. Unruh, Niederländisch-niederdeutschen Hintergründe der mennonitischen Ostwanderungen im 16., 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (Karlsruhe: Self-published, 1955), 276; for original scan, cf. P. Franz, “Einwohnerbücher mennonitischer Siedlungen in Chortitz und Umgebung 1808: Burwalde,” https://chortitza.org/Dok/Bw1808.pdf.
Note 3: "Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for May 1811," Dnipropetrovsk Archives, Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 299, trans. by Richard D. Thiessen, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_May_1811.pdf; “Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for 4 October 1814,” Dnipropetrovsk Archives, Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 405, translated by Richard D. Thiessen; see Einlage, (landowner household no. 7, Jakob Sawatzky, foster child Jakob); landless household no. 16, Heinrich Heese. http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_October_1814.pdf.
Note 4: Cf. Tim Janzen, “Smallpox Vaccinations in Chortitza Colony, 12 August 1809,” Odessa Archives, Fund 6, Inventory 1, File 195, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/1809.htm.
Note 5: Cf. David H. Epp and Nikolai Regehr, Heinrich Heese und Johann Philipp Wiebe. Zwei Vordermänner des südrussländischen Mennonitentums (Steinbach, MB: Echo, 1952).
Note 6: Unruh, Niederländisch-niederdeutschen Hintergründe, 281.
Note 7: “Mennonites from the Molotschna Colony Who Requested Transfer to the Chortitza Colony” (document dated January 29, 1836), from Odessa Archives, fond 6, inventory 1, file 4127, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/1836_Transfers_Molotschna_to_Chortitza.htm. See also "The Molotschna Colony Census of 1835: Chortitza and Bergthal Colony Connections," by Glenn Penner, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_May_1811.pdf.
Note 8: Peter M. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 780f., https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/; Detlef Brandes, “German Colonists in Southern Ukraine up to the Repeal of the Colonial Statute,” in German-Ukrainian Relations in Historical Perspective, edited by H.-J. Torke and J.-P. Himka, 10–28 (Edmonton: Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Press, 1994), 20.
Note 10: Gerhard Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung der Mennoniten aus Russland nach Amerika (Winnipeg, MB, 1900), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=Pis/Wiebe.pdf.
Note 11: Wiebe, Ursachen und Geschichte der Auswanderung der Mennoniten.
Note 12 (and pic): Johann Funk, as well as his parents, wife Susanna, and children departed from Liverpool, England on June 17, 1875 on the SS Moravian, landing in Quebec City on July 1 (Library and Archives Canada. “Passenger lists of the Moravian arriving in Quebec, Que., on 1875,” https://www.bac-lac.gc.ca/eng/discover/immigration/immigration-records/passenger-lists/passenger-lists-1865-1922/Pages/image.aspx?Image=e003538343&URLjpg=http%3a%2f%2fcentral.bac-lac.gc.ca%2f.item%2f%3fid%3de003538343%26op%3dimg%26app%3dpassengerlist&Ecopy=e003538343.
Note 13: Cf. Isaac Horst, “Colonization in the 1870s,” Ontario Mennonite History 16, no. 2 (October 1998) 19–23; 20f., http://www.mhso.org/sites/default/files/publications/Ontmennohistory16-2.pdf.
Note 14: Cf. Horst, “Colonization in the 1870."
Note 15: Cf. E. K. Francis, In Search of Utopia: The Mennonites in Manitoba (Glencoe, IL: Free, 1955), https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015027929622;view=1up;seq=7.
Note 16: Cited in E. K. Francis, “The Mennonite school problem in Manitoba, 1874–1919,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 27, no. 3 (1953) 204–237; 217; on Kliewer, cf. Gerhard J. Ens, “Die Schule muss sein”: A History of the Mennonite Collegiate Institute (Gretna, MB: Mennonite Collegiate Institute, 1990) 9f. For more on Johann Funk, see Richard D. Thiessen, "Funk, Johann (1836-1917)," Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online (GAMEO), https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Funk,_Johann_(1836-1917). For a 1895 report on the schools by School Inspector H. H. Ewert, 1895, cf. "Die District-Schulen in der Mennoniten-Reserve in Süd-Manitoba," Mennonitische Rundschau 16, no. 17 (April 24, 1895), 1, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/?file=0v842.pdf. Ewert ordered a German translation of the relevant sections of the education act for rural schools, because in his estimation fewer than one-percent of the population knew enough English to understand the requirement. He felt that much of the "difficulties" stemmed from misunderstandings and rumours.
Note 17: On J. J. Bräul, see for example B. H. Unruh, "Bräul, Johann J. (1854-1916)," GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Br%C3%A4ul,_Johann_J._(1854-1916).
Note 18: Klippenstein, “Funk, Johann,” Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online.
Note 19: See my post on Marga Bräul, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/03/formidable-fraulein-marga-braul-19192011.html.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

Last Days of Mennonite Life on the Molotschna, September 1943

The Molotschna Mennonite Colony was established in 1803; 140 years later its villages were evacuated by retreating German armies. A map of the larger German operation of 1943 and the various "Trecks" is attached. The tens of thousands of evacuees included some 35,000 Mennonites. Nazi Germany had utterly failed Ukrainians, but continued to have plans for their "ethnic Germans" in the east. On Sept. 8, 1943 , the Red Army successfully took Donetsk (Stalino), 230 km east of Molotschna. The next day, S.S. administrators gave orders that every Molotschna family should load one wagon with their possessions and prepare for an orderly evacuation. Hitler was intent on holding Crimea, and sought to set up a defensive line from Zaporizhzhia to Melitopol and south to the Sea of Azov. Evacuation plans east of this line were in place since late June—initially to be resettled “somewhere” west of the Dnieper; on Aug. 17 first steps were taken to move 8,000 hospital beds west o...

The Shift from Dutch to German, 1700s

Already in 1671, Mennonite Flemish Elder Georg Hansen in Danzig published his German-language catechism ( Glaubens-Bericht für die Jugend ) as preparation for youth seeking baptism. Though educational competencies varied, Hansen’s Glaubens-Bericht assumed that youth preparing for baptism had a stronger ability to read complex German than Dutch ( note 1 ). Popular Mennonite preacher Jacob Denner (1659–1746), originally from the Hamburg-Altona Mennonite Church, lived in Danzig for four years in the early 1700s. A first volume of his Dutch sermons was published in 1706 in Danzig and Amsterdam, and then in 1730 and 1751 he published two German collections. Untrained preachers would often read Denner’s sermons: “Those who preached German—which all Prussian preachers around 1750 did, with the exception of the Danzig preachers—had no sermons books from their co-religionists other than this one by Jacob Denner” ( note 2 ). In Danzig and the Vistula Delta region there were some differences...

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists. Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” ( note 1 ). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” ( note 2 ). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context ( note 3 ). Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 15...

Eugenics and Euthanasia: Russian Mennonites and the Third Reich

Little surprises me when I write about Russian Mennonites caught “between the devil and the deep blue sea.” A 1944 letter I found recently from Mennonite Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh however offers a new and disturbing snapshot of this leader and the Russian Mennonite community under the umbrella of the Third Reich ( note 1 ). It is not too much to say that this larger-than-life leader stands at the centre of almost every significant Russian Mennonite story between 1915 and 1945, including community decisions during the revolution, the formation of MCC, the emigration of 20,000 Russländer, the miracle release of thousands gathered at the gates of Moscow, 1929-30, the creation of the Paraguayan Fernheim Colony, famine relief in the 1930s, the Canadian debates about identity and worldview in Der Bote and the Rundschau papers, and almost everything that happened with Mennonites in Ukraine from 1941 to 1945. His importance for the Mennonite story cannot be understated. Even for many conte...