Skip to main content

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget!

In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School (Zentralschule). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member (note 1).

Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations.


Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite educators in Canada in 1972:

"It is not a matter of how much time you have, but how you utilize it. When you are tired of working with your brain, then take a drawing or craft to hand and rest your mind. After a while your brain is rested and your hand has produced something to give you satisfaction. Now you can turn to your studies refreshed and satisfied." (Note 2)

She was known to have a tireless, creative capacity with a broad range of interests and gifts. Marga was more theologically literate than most pastors; on a visit to Canada she gave me an informed albeit decidedly conservative and vigorous evaluation of the work of German existentialist theologian Rudolf Bultmann--I was doing my PhD at the time on this material! She loved debate and, despite concerns of some parents and churches, she became a strong advocate for sports training for girls in Mennonite schools as well.

Not only was Marga Bräul able to engage and inspire—she could terrify, according to former students.


In the early 1970s she was asked by North Americans whether Mennonite youth in Paraguay shared the rebelliousness of adolescents in other parts of the world. Bräul answered:

Our youth have a full day. They must in addition to their studies, keep the yard and buildings of the school clean and in good repair. Our girls plant flowers and generally tend the garden. Twice a week the girls clean the dining room thoroughly, and they are also in charge of meals. There is little time for mischief. (Note 3)

Marga’s motto was to “do your duty,” which reflected both the strengths and weaknesses of her generation’s worldview and the value it placed on obedience. In 1972, the western cultural revolution had not yet shaken the Paraguayan Chaco.

Marga witnessed the impact of Stalin’s terror firsthand. In 1933 at age 14, her 74-year-old Klassen grandfather was arrested and imprisoned in Halbstadt without food for two weeks. He was released but died on the way back. That same day, their Paulsheim home was ransacked and the pillow and mattress on which his bed-ridden wife lay were taken and cut-open. She went into shock and unable to speak when Marga’s parents found her and died that very night. Because they were deemed kulaks, wagons came on the day of the burial and all the furniture, beds and clothes were carried off. One of Marga’s disenfranchised uncles and minister Aron Bräul hid at their home for a time. Four of her uncles were arrested and shot or exiled (1937-38). Her father survived because he had had tuberculosis and was left with only a part of one lung. Her younger brother however was deported—in his father's stead, they believed (note 4).


Despite the turbulence of the 1930s Marga completed high school and also entered teachers’ college at the Soviet German Language-Pedagogical Institute, with one year of training in Odessa and one year in the port city of Berdjansk on the Sea of Azov.

Marga majored in politically safe or neutral courses: mathematics, algebra, geometry, physics and chemistry. She was not however exempt from military studies, and was trained as a parachutist (note 5). After teachers’ college, she taught two years in a Russian school near Melitopol on the Molotschna River.


With German occupation in 1941, Marga was employed as a bookkeeper and translator for the occupation forces and stationed in Nishnije Serogosy (Nyzhni Sirohozy), Zaporoshje (note 6). With the retreat of the Germans in 1943, she also ended up in Warthegau/Poland. In 1944 in Lutbrandau, she was retrained for teaching in the German Reich under S.S. Storm Leader and friend of the Mennonites, Karl Götz.


Marga inspired and shaped hundreds of Mennonite high school students over more than four decades at the Fernheim high school—including her much younger cousin Käthe Bräul, my mother.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. Joseph Winfield Fretz, Pilgrims in Paraguay: The Story of Mennonite Colonization in South America (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1953), 80, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001448782.

Note 2: Marga Bräul, cited in Lore Lubosch, “Little time left for mischief,” Mennonite Mirror 2, no. 1 (September 1972), 11–12; 11, https://cmbs.mennonitebrethren.ca/publications/mennonite-mirror/.

Note 3: Cited in Lubosch, “Little time left for mischief,” 12.

Note 4: Agatha Klassen Bräul, Diary [Marga’s mother]. Copy in my possession.

Note 5: Gati Harder, “Bräul, Marga,” Lexikon der Mennoniten in Paraguay, Online 2011, http://www.menonitica.org/lexikon/?B:Br%E4ul%2C_Marga.

Note 6: Einwandererzentrale (Central Immigration Office), National Archives Collection Microfilm Publication, EWZ A3342-EWZ50-A073, 2054.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...

Non-Resistant Service: Forestry Camps

The 1902 photos are of the Mennonite Crimean Forestry ( Forstei ) “Commando” in the vineyards and orchards of southern Crimea on route to Yalta (" Gut [estate] Forroß";  note 1). The tasks for the units or commandos were to plant forests, lay out nurseries, and raise model orchards—work not directly or meaningfully connected to non-resistance, but deemed by the state as an acceptable alternative to state or military service. This non-combatant, alternative service program was the largest, most expensive and most formative, faith-based undertaking by Mennonites during the Mennonite "golden era" in Russia ( note 2 ). The first cohort of young men were chosen and sent for their term of alternative service in 1880: “On November 15 [1880] in Tokmak the first German youth were chosen [by lot] in the presence of the [Mennonite] district mayor and also of Elder A. Goerz. There, with singing and prayer, they beseeched the Lord for His mercy, which interested the Russian ...