“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” (note 1) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story.

In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” (note 2). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed?

Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” (note 3).

Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each other with “good deeds wherever it is needed, without being asked or ordered.” “The poor Mennonite will never suffer need; those impacted by fire, theft, or accident can anticipate almost full replacement loss” (note 4). “We have no poor,” a Mennonite minister informed a visiting scholar to the Vistula Delta in 1794; “we ensure that no one in our midst becomes impoverished” (note 5).

One example: in 1749 the Flemish Mennonite congregation in Danzig had eight elderly couples and sixteen individuals whom they cared for in their “poor house” (note 6).

Protestant and Catholic neighbours were also often recipients of “these good deeds from the hands of Mennonites,” as Reiswitz and Wadzek observed, though “this rarely occurs where those faith groups are hostile to Mennonites and pull themselves away from them” (note 7).

In Russia, according to Peter Epp, “every village took care of its own poor. It must be said, however, that there were seldom more than two or three poor families. At the end of the village several houses were built with quarters for the poor. The houses had a plot of ground for vegetables and a little orchard. Fodder for the domestic animals was brought to them by the village as well” (note 8).

Johann Cornies’ powerful “Agricultural Society” gave direction in this regard the young families unable to purchase a farm property. “The Society gives preference to the most diligent poor young families, providing places for them to construct houses and ensuring that poor and weak families are accommodated and receive housing” (note 9). He also had ideas about what the some of the poor should not be given: “The District Office should ensure that no disorderly, indolent, and extremely poor Mennonites from Khortitsa District are permitted to settle in the Bergthal District. All Mennonites who wish to resettle from Khortitsa must have sufficient funds and the ability to give dependable guarantees …” ([and Cornies was livid when that did in fact occur!] note 10).

In a letter by Johann Cornies to a Prussian Mennonite, 1833, he wrote: “In accordance with your wishes, I have given the money received for your [deceased] son’s clothing to Gerhard Reimer, Ohrloff, administrator for the support of the poor in our community” (note 11). His Agricultural Society bylaws stated that “the oppression of the poor or weak by well-to-do or rich villagers is prohibited” (note 12).

A notice from the Chortitza Mennonite Church in the Mennonitische Blätter a half century later (1891) provides a window onto the tradition as it was lived in Russia: the elderly, sick, and those otherwise unable to work are supported in part or in full by a congregational "tax for the poor" and also through free-will offerings. The Chortitza notice concludes with Galatians 6:10: "Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

“Southern Russia, Chortitza--As in many other congregations, the Chortitza Mennonite Church also has a benevolent fund for the poor. Congregational members who are old, ill, or unable to work and therefore poor, and who without this fund would be at the mercy of strangers ('fremde Leute' -interesting!]), are regularly supported. Monies flow into this fund for the poor partly through an insignificant so-called "poor tax" paid by congregational members, and partly—or for the most part—through voluntary donations and contributions from the same. The last account for the year 1890, which was read out at the Chortitza congregational meeting on January 4, 1891, shows revenues of 3,227 rubles and 13 kopeks, of which 500 rubles were collected from the estate of the deceased congregational brother Johann Brandt of Chortitza Island in accordance with his last will. In total, 2,465 rubles and 61 kopecks were spent to assist or to maintain completely poor members of the community; thus, a surplus of 761 rubles, 52 kopecks remains. As pleasing as this fact is, it must not hold us back from further works of love. The number of those in need of support is increasing from year to year, which is why we are addressing all the members of the Chortitza congregation at the beginning of this New Year with the request to remember the admonition of the Apostle Paul according to Galatians 6:10." (Note 13)

In Canada from the Leamington United Mennonite Church’s history volume (1925-1972), retired elder N. N. Driedger (b. 1893) reflected on the “alteration” in the method of taking offering in the 1930s:

“In Russia an offering box was usually fastened somewhere near the church exit so that worshipers leaving the service might make a contribution. Here in Canada the usual method was to pass an offering plate along each pew.”

The change “met with some resistance,” Driedger recalled. Moreover, collection was now taken every Sunday, and the amounts collected were announced the next week.

“At first offerings were taken on no particular schedule except that once per month an offering was lifted for relief in Russia and later once per month for the church building fund. Two Sundays per month were usually open … On January 10, 1932, a motion was passed by the members to announce openly the amount of each offering, a practice still in vogue today.” (Note 14)

The offering plate is a Canadian "innovation,” apparently. Does it make a difference? 90 years later we are donating to our local Mennonite congregation with e-transfers and to MCC with credit card.

Either way, I remain inspired and challenged by this pillar of our tradition: “there are no poor among us.”

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Menno Simons, Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 558 (different pagination online: http://www.mennosimons.net/fulltext.html).

Note 2: Abraham Hartwich, Geographisch-Historische Landes-Beschribung [sic] derer dreyen im Pohlnischen Preußen liegenden Werdern (Königsberg, 1723), 293, http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/resolve/display/bsb10000874.html.

Note 3: Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten und Nachricht von ihren Colonien: nebst Lebensbeschreibung Menno Simonis (Berlin: Rücker, 1824), 46, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717593.

Note 4: Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten, 42f.

Note 5: Cf. the longer excerpt by Ludwig von Baczko in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten in ihrem religiösen und sozialen Leben in ihren kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Leistungen, Teil 2, 1772–bis zur Gegenwart (Kirchheim-Bolanden/Weierhof: Self-published, 1987), 30.

Note 6: See Hermann G. Mannhardt, Die Danziger Mennonitengemeinde. Ihre Entstehung und ihre Geschichte von 1569–1919 (Danzig, 1919), 83. https://archive.org/details/diedanzigermenno00mannuoft.

Note 7: Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten, 42f.

Note 8: Peter Epp to J. Winfield Fretz, letter, cited in J. Winfield Fretz, “Mutual Aid Among Mennonites (I),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 13, no. 1 (1939), 42.

Note 9: “No. 521. Johann Cornies’ description of the administrative and other arrangements instituted for the functioning_of the Molochnaia Mennonite District 1841. December 1841(?)," Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 2: 1836–1842, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 498, n.24, https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/100164/1/Southern_Ukrainian_Steppe_UTP_9781487538743.pdf.

Note 10: “No. 677, October 28, 1842 [?], Johann Cornies to Bergthal Settlement Administrators;” cf. also Cornies to von Hahn, “No. 679, November [1842],” in idem, Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, II, 633; 635.

Note 11: Idem, Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, 1812–1835, vol. I (2015), “No. 362, April 24, 1833.”

Note 12: “No. 521. Johann Cornies’ description of the administrative and other arrangements …,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, II, 498.

Note 13: Mennonitische Blätter no. 5 (March 1, 1891), 31, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1854-1900/1891/DSCF1344.JPG.

Note 14: N. N. Driedger, Leamington United Mennonite Church: Establishment and Development, 1925-1972, trans. J. N. Driedger (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1972), 46. http://www.ekmha.ca/collections/files/original/005b8bc1f6945f5316ac7abcd4f3cd20.pdf. See also the helpful article by Harold S. Bender, “Offerings,” GAMEO: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Offerings.

Comments

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws. It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina Neufeld Bräul

This month (April 2023) we celebrated my aunt’s 97th birthday—Adina Neufeld Bräul. Queen Elizabeth II and Aunt Adina were born within hours of each other, April 20-21, 1926. She once told me—in somewhat different words—that this makes her wonder about God’s providence … In 1944 in German-annexed Poland, my 16-year-old uncle Walter Bräul was required to report for military service. His first thought: no good soldier should be without a girlfriend! Before leaving for training, he asked one of the girls from "the trek" on a date to see a movie in Exin. Seven years later they would marry in Paraguay. Adina and her mother and sister were on the same trek or group (Gnadenfeld/ Molotschna) out of Ukraine as Walter and my mother (in the 2023 photo). Adina’s most terrible memory of the trek was when their wagon almost tipped over into a deep ravine. She was 17—a year older than Walter—and it was Walter’s 17-year-old brother Peter who literally jumped from his wagon to physically stop ...

A Traveler's Impressions of the Molotschna, 1927

In November 1927, Susanna Toews of Ohrloff, Molotschna wrote to her brother Gerhard in Canada, "Father is sleeping and the sisters are reading, even though they have read the stuff ten times. . .. Twice a week we get Das Neue Dorf . We read the most important material the first evening and then father reads the rest of it the next day" ( note 1 ). A youth in Friedensruh, Molotschna reported to the communist youth paper Die Saat in 1928, that their village receives 13 copies of Das Neue Dorf , 6 copies of Die Saat , one of the Moscow-based Deutsche Zentral-Zeitung , 16 copies of Die Trompete, 2 copies of Neuland , and some Russian papers as well. On average, 2 papers per household--all communist papers. A Mennonite-based monthly agricultural journal, “The Practical Agriculturalist” ( Der praktische Landwirt ) had been approved for publication in Ukraine in 1924 but was shut down in December 1926. Government authorities in Ukraine were exasperated to see a “significant a...

What does it cost to settle a Refugee? Basic without Medical Care (1930)

In January 1930, the Mennonite Central Committee was scrambling to get 3,885 Mennonites out of Germany and settled somewhere fast. These refugees had fled via Moscow in December 1929, and Germany was willing only to serve as first transit stop ( note 1 ). Canada was very reluctant to take any German-speaking Mennonites—the Great Depression had begun and a negative memory of war resistance still lingered. In the end Canada took 1,344 Mennonites and the USA took none born in Russia. Paraguay was the next best option ( note 2 ). The German government preferred Brazil, but Brazil would not guarantee freedom from military service, which was a problem for American Mennonite financiers. There were already some conservative "cousins" from Manitoba in Paraguay who had negotiated with the government and learned through trial and error how to survive in the "Green Hell" of the Paraguayan Chaco. MCC with the assistance of a German aid organization purchased and distribute...

Stalin’s Purge (1937-38) and Mennonite Suffering: 8 theses

1. Millions died under Stalin One of the more recent studies on the Stalin-era estimates that more than 28.7 million people suffered in the northern prisons and slave camps of the Gulag and 2.75 million people died there during Stalin’s reign ( note 1 ). To this number must be added the “close to a million political executions, the millions who died in transit to the Gulag, and some six to seven million who died of starvation during the early 1930s” ( note 2 ). The mass deportation of workers and peasants provided millions of forced labourers in the Arctic and Siberia. George K. Epp calculated that approximately one-third of Mennonites in the Soviet Union—at least 30,000—died due to exposure, beatings, overwork, disease, starvation or shootings ( note 3 ). 2. Mennonites in Ukraine suffered together with their Ukrainian neighbours Moscow was fearful of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ) and specifically targeted it with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of U...

Flemish Anabaptists and Witch Hunts

Political leaders have long used the term "witch hunt"--and there is an historical connection to Mennonites. Anabaptists and so-called “witches” were arrested and tried for related reasons in the Low Countries in the 1500s: namely, as a means to divert God’s wrath. The late-Medievals feared that heresy—in this case ana-baptism and the challenge to other sacraments—invited the wrath of God, and was an instrument for the devil’s own hellish apocalyptic assault. The assumption: the devil's tactics to destroy Christendom included the use of both heretics and sorcerers. Gary Waite writes convincingly that both were seen as “polluting” the community and thus both had to be "excised." "This fear of pollution, or scandalizing God or the saints, also explains why small numbers of peaceable Mennonites were so harshly treated during the second half of the sixteenth century. Plagues, fires, and economic and social crises were often blamed on the presence of even a smal...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog