Skip to main content

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” (note 1) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story.

In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” (note 2). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed?


Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” (note 3).

Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each other with “good deeds wherever it is needed, without being asked or ordered.” “The poor Mennonite will never suffer need; those impacted by fire, theft, or accident can anticipate almost full replacement loss” (note 4). “We have no poor,” a Mennonite minister informed a visiting scholar to the Vistula Delta in 1794; “we ensure that no one in our midst becomes impoverished” (note 5).

One example: in 1749 the Flemish Mennonite congregation in Danzig had eight elderly couples and sixteen individuals whom they cared for in their “poor house” (note 6).

Protestant and Catholic neighbours were also often recipients of “these good deeds from the hands of Mennonites,” as Reiswitz and Wadzek observed, though “this rarely occurs where those faith groups are hostile to Mennonites and pull themselves away from them” (note 7).

In Russia, according to Peter Epp, “every village took care of its own poor. It must be said, however, that there were seldom more than two or three poor families. At the end of the village several houses were built with quarters for the poor. The houses had a plot of ground for vegetables and a little orchard. Fodder for the domestic animals was brought to them by the village as well” (note 8).


Johann Cornies’ powerful “Agricultural Society” gave direction in this regard the young families unable to purchase a farm property. “The Society gives preference to the most diligent poor young families, providing places for them to construct houses and ensuring that poor and weak families are accommodated and receive housing” (note 9). He also had ideas about what the some of the poor should not be given: “The District Office should ensure that no disorderly, indolent, and extremely poor Mennonites from Khortitsa District are permitted to settle in the Bergthal District. All Mennonites who wish to resettle from Khortitsa must have sufficient funds and the ability to give dependable guarantees …” ([and Cornies was livid when that did in fact occur!] note 10).

In a letter by Johann Cornies to a Prussian Mennonite, 1833, he wrote: “In accordance with your wishes, I have given the money received for your [deceased] son’s clothing to Gerhard Reimer, Ohrloff, administrator for the support of the poor in our community” (note 11). His Agricultural Society bylaws stated that “the oppression of the poor or weak by well-to-do or rich villagers is prohibited” (note 12).

A notice from the Chortitza Mennonite Church in the Mennonitische Blätter a half century later (1891) provides a window onto the tradition as it was lived in Russia: the elderly, sick, and those otherwise unable to work are supported in part or in full by a congregational "tax for the poor" and also through free-will offerings. The Chortitza notice concludes with Galatians 6:10: "Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers."

“Southern Russia, Chortitza--As in many other congregations, the Chortitza Mennonite Church also has a benevolent fund for the poor. Congregational members who are old, ill, or unable to work and therefore poor, and who without this fund would be at the mercy of strangers ('fremde Leute' -interesting!]), are regularly supported. Monies flow into this fund for the poor partly through an insignificant so-called "poor tax" paid by congregational members, and partly—or for the most part—through voluntary donations and contributions from the same. The last account for the year 1890, which was read out at the Chortitza congregational meeting on January 4, 1891, shows revenues of 3,227 rubles and 13 kopeks, of which 500 rubles were collected from the estate of the deceased congregational brother Johann Brandt of Chortitza Island in accordance with his last will. In total, 2,465 rubles and 61 kopecks were spent to assist or to maintain completely poor members of the community; thus, a surplus of 761 rubles, 52 kopecks remains. As pleasing as this fact is, it must not hold us back from further works of love. The number of those in need of support is increasing from year to year, which is why we are addressing all the members of the Chortitza congregation at the beginning of this New Year with the request to remember the admonition of the Apostle Paul according to Galatians 6:10." (Note 13)

In Canada from the Leamington United Mennonite Church’s history volume (1925-1972), retired elder N. N. Driedger (b. 1893) reflected on the “alteration” in the method of taking offering in the 1930s:

“In Russia an offering box was usually fastened somewhere near the church exit so that worshipers leaving the service might make a contribution. Here in Canada the usual method was to pass an offering plate along each pew.”


The change “met with some resistance,” Driedger recalled. Moreover, collection was now taken every Sunday, and the amounts collected were announced the next week.

“At first offerings were taken on no particular schedule except that once per month an offering was lifted for relief in Russia and later once per month for the church building fund. Two Sundays per month were usually open … On January 10, 1932, a motion was passed by the members to announce openly the amount of each offering, a practice still in vogue today.” (Note 14)

The offering plate is a Canadian "innovation,” apparently. Does it make a difference? 90 years later we are donating to our local Mennonite congregation with e-transfers and to MCC with credit card.


Either way, I remain inspired and challenged by this pillar of our tradition: “there are no poor among us.”

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Menno Simons, Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 558 (different pagination online: http://www.mennosimons.net/fulltext.html).

Note 2: Abraham Hartwich, Geographisch-Historische Landes-Beschribung [sic] derer dreyen im Pohlnischen Preußen liegenden Werdern (Königsberg, 1723), 293, http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/resolve/display/bsb10000874.html.

Note 3: Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten und Nachricht von ihren Colonien: nebst Lebensbeschreibung Menno Simonis (Berlin: Rücker, 1824), 46, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717593.

Note 4: Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten, 42f.

Note 5: Cf. the longer excerpt by Ludwig von Baczko in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten in ihrem religiösen und sozialen Leben in ihren kulturellen und wirtschaftlichen Leistungen, Teil 2, 1772–bis zur Gegenwart (Kirchheim-Bolanden/Weierhof: Self-published, 1987), 30.

Note 6: See Hermann G. Mannhardt, Die Danziger Mennonitengemeinde. Ihre Entstehung und ihre Geschichte von 1569–1919 (Danzig, 1919), 83. https://archive.org/details/diedanzigermenno00mannuoft.

Note 7: Reiswitz and Wadzeck, Glaubensbekenntniss der Mennoniten, 42f.

Note 8: Peter Epp to J. Winfield Fretz, letter, cited in J. Winfield Fretz, “Mutual Aid Among Mennonites (I),” Mennonite Quarterly Review 13, no. 1 (1939), 42.

Note 9: “No. 521. Johann Cornies’ description of the administrative and other arrangements instituted for the functioning_of the Molochnaia Mennonite District 1841. December 1841(?)," Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 2: 1836–1842, translated by Ingrid I. Epp; edited by Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 498, n.24, https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/bitstream/1807/100164/1/Southern_Ukrainian_Steppe_UTP_9781487538743.pdf.

Note 10: “No. 677, October 28, 1842 [?], Johann Cornies to Bergthal Settlement Administrators;” cf. also Cornies to von Hahn, “No. 679, November [1842],” in idem, Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, II, 633; 635.

Note 11: Idem, Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, 1812–1835, vol. I (2015), “No. 362, April 24, 1833.”

Note 12: “No. 521. Johann Cornies’ description of the administrative and other arrangements …,” Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe, II, 498.

Note 13: Mennonitische Blätter no. 5 (March 1, 1891), 31, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1854-1900/1891/DSCF1344.JPG.

Note 14: N. N. Driedger, Leamington United Mennonite Church: Establishment and Development, 1925-1972, trans. J. N. Driedger (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1972), 46. http://www.ekmha.ca/collections/files/original/005b8bc1f6945f5316ac7abcd4f3cd20.pdf. See also the helpful article by Harold S. Bender, “Offerings,” GAMEO: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Offerings.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

German Village on the Dnieper: Occupation Propaganda Photos. Chortitza, 1943

The following propaganda photos are of the Mennonites community in Chortitz, Ukraine during German occupation in World War II. German armies reached the Mennonite villages on the west bank of the Dnieper River on August 17, 1941. The photos below were taken almost two years later. However the war was already turning, and within two months the trek out of Ukraine would begin. The photographs are accompanied by an article about the Low-German speakers of Chortitza for a readership in the Reich ( note 1 ). The author repeatedly draws on the myth of one-sided German pioneer accomplishments abroad: “The first settlers found the land desolate and empty,” the reader is told, and were “left to fend for themselves in a foreign environment” where with German diligence, order and cleanliness they thrived. The article correctly recognizes the great losses of the ethnic Germans under Bolshevism--as if to convince readers that the war is a shared burden of all Germans, and which is now payin...

Nazi German love for Mennonites in Ukraine. Why?

For Mennonites the dramatic and massive invasion of USSR by German forces in Summer/Fall 1941 meant liberation from Soviet state terror and answer to prayer. Nazi Germany spared neither money nor personnel to free, feed, cloth, protect, heal and educate the Soviet Union’s ethnic Germans—and Mennonites in particular. Mennonite memoirs, village reports and EWZ (naturalization applications) autobiographies are consistent with praise for the German Reich and its leader. From the highest levels, goodwill, care and patience towards ethnic Germans was policy. Reichsführer -SS Heinrich Himmler was also named by Hitler as Reich Commissioner for the Consolidation of German Nationhood . This authorized Himmler and his para-military SS to oversee and coordinate the Germanization, resettlements and population transfers which came with the invasion and partial annexation of Poland (Warthegau), and later occupation plans for parts of Ukraine and Russia. The VoMi ( Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle )...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

"They are useful to the state." An almost forgotten Prussian view of Mennonites, ca. 1780s-90s

In 1787 Mennonite interest for emigration was extremely strong outside the quasi independent City of Danzig in the Prussian annexed Marienwerder and Elbing regions. Even before the land scouts Johann Bartsch and Jacob Höppner had returned from Russia later that year, so many Mennonite exit applications had flooded offices that officials wrote Berlin in August 1787 for direction ( note 1a ). Initially officials did not see a problem: because Mennonites do not provide soldiers, the cantons lose nothing by their departure, and in fact benefit from the ten-percent tax imposed on financial assets leaving the state.  Ludwig von Baczko (1756-1823), Professor of History at the Artillery Academy in Königsberg, East Prussia, was the general editor of a series that included a travelogue through Prussia written by a certain Karl Ephraim Nanke. Nanke had no special love for Mennonites, but was generally balanced in his judgements and based his now almost forgotten account of Mennonites on perso...

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...