Abraham Kröker (1863-1944) was the well-known editor of the
Molotschna-based paper—variously named Volksfreund, Friedensstimme or Flugblatt,
as well as the annual Familienkalender. He published through WW1 and the
anarchy and early Bolshevist years, which included six months of friendly
German occupation in 1918.
His editorials from those times are all online and
fascinating to read, https://chortitza.org/FB/mennru.htm. Looking back on the
collapse of Mennonite life in Ukraine, he pointed to the love of “mammon,” the
“materialistic disposition” and “nationalistic arrogance” of Mennonites, and
not least to the forgetfulness of the unique call of the community to “sacrifice,
suffering and renunciation for the sake of others.”
Under friendly German occupation, the Mennonite press had
freedom to ask the community’s most pressing and difficult theological
question: Why has God allowed us to suffer? In his editorial published
immediately after German “liberation” from Makhno's anarchists in April 1918,
Kröker framed the events in terms of divine discipline for the reckless pursuit
of wealth.
“We have neglected our workers spiritually and
intellectually. One should have offered them reading materials and for those
who could not read, create the possibility to learn how. And above all we
should have done more—though this was of course strictly forbidden under the
old regime—to familiarize them with the gospel. ...”
And to dispel all thought that the community’s suffering was
a type of religious persecution, Kröker drew an explicit contrast to “our
martyr fathers” who in clear conscience “suffered for the sake of the highest
things.” Rather,
“… we have suffered because of 'mammon' which we pursued too
vigorously. We were far too materialistic, too selfish. That is why God first
sent the land liquidation laws; and when he did not achieve his goal, the knife
had to cut deeper. A man is punished with that with which he sins. Do we
understand this? Have we learnt anything?” (Note 2)
Over the next weeks, other letter writers also pointed to
the “madness of the materialists.” “Our people are hard of heart, selfish and
have abused their earlier privileges in many ways" (note 3). These were
only the first attempts at answers by a shocked people largely convinced that
God rules over history, and conscious of a special calling in the divine drama
in and with Russia.
And amongst all denominations, “it has pleased God,” according to Kröker, to “present and manifest” through the Mennonites this “pearl of evangelical truth gained at great cost by our fathers.” Kröker restates the same conviction a year later: Mennonites are “predestined to foreshadow … even in an imperfect way, the great peace among nations in the Thousand-Year-Reign [of Christ]” (note 4). And it is because of this theological hope that “our youth are raised differently,” he reminds his readers; “not military bravery or fighting are presented as the highest civic virtues, but rather sacrifice, suffering and renunciation for the sake of others. In all our schools, non-resistance is explicitly taught and impressed [upon students] according to the Mennonite catechism” (note 5).
The first new issue of the Friedensstimme was published July
12, 1919—during a short pause in the chaos—with a lengthy three-page editorial
asking again, “Where did we fail?” “What sins could have provoked this [divine]
judgement?” (note 6). His editorial is biting, while offering a path forward:
“We did not prove ourselves reliable with the earthly goods
entrusted to us by God. We did not understand how to use the unjust mammon to
make friends. … We did not first seek God’s kingdom and his righteousness.”
This first new editorial under friendly White Army rule also had much to confess, especially
with regard to national or racial arrogance. When it “was almost a crime to be
a German … many of us signed petitions that ‘no German blood flows through our
veins’… though we all know very well, that we are Germanified Dutchmen.”
Yet with German occupation of Ukraine we “suddenly became
more extreme Germanophiles than the Imperial Germans … Placing our trust in
this highly militaristic Germany was a denial of our better self and in direct
contradiction to our traditions and principles.” After “reaffirming our
Mennonite principle of non-resistance [Alternative Service as medics]… only one
year later most of us abandoned this principle.”
Editor Kröker refused to lay blame on those who served in
the Selbstschutz, but pointed instead to “the cause,” namely “our exaggerated
enthusiasm for Germany. This was not always with us, but it was triggered by
the injustice which we Germans in Russia had to endure. … Until the war we
lived in good agreement with our Russian neighbours. … We must free ourselves
from all nationalistic arrogance” (note 7).
In November 1919, Kröker wrote unambiguously to his
Mennonite readership that the community as a whole had “provoked the sword.”
“Our Fathers reaching back to the martyrs cherished and
upheld the treasure of their insight [non-resistance] high above all else, and
sacrificed even property and life… . But in the summer of 1918, the South
Russian Mennonites of our generation experienced in very short order a stark
exchange of their convictions, and though there was no particular necessity for
it at the time, they let go of the invaluable good of non-resistance. Today
many already recognize that they had made a great error at that time. … It
appears to me that we … provoked the sword, and it has fallen upon us as a
people. Besides the materialistic disposition, the pursuit of wealth, this
could be the greatest sin of our people, and should be recognized and confessed.”
(Note 8)
Perhaps there is still some wisdom in reading a previous
generation struggling through tumultuous times.
---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast
---Notes---
Note 1: Abraham Kröker, “Des Christen Stellung zum Staat,
zur Obrigkeit, Politik und Parteiwesen,” Volksfreund II (XI), no. 5 (23) (1918), 1, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pletk10.pdf
Generally, cf. Helmut T. Huebert,
“Abraham Jakob Kroeker: A Father of M.B. Publication in Russia, 1863–1944,” in Shepherds,
Servants and Prophets: Leadership Among the Russian Mennonites (ca. 1880–1960),
edited by Harry Loewen, 247–264 (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2003). Also GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Kroeker,_Abraham_Jakob_(1863-1944).
Note 2: Kröker, “Unsere Befreiung,” Volksfreund II (XI), no.
16 (34) (April 27, 1918), 1 [broken link]
Note 3: Volksfreund II (XI), no. 17 (35) (May 1, 1918), 3
[broken link].
Note 4: Kröker, “Mennonitentum und Wehrlosigkeit,” Friedenstimme XVII,
no. 38 (November 16, 1919), 2–3; 2, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pletk96.pdf.
Note 5: Kröker, “Einige Gedanken zu unserm
Wehrlosigkeitsprinzip,” Friedensstimme XVI, no. 53 (September 21, 1918), 2, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pletk63.pdf.
Note 6: Kröker, “Worin liegt unser Fehler?,” Friedensstimme XVII,
no. 21 (July 12, 1919), 1–3, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pletk86.pdf.
Note 7: Kröker, “Worin liegt unser Fehler?”
Note 8: Kröker, “Mennonitentum und Wehrlosigkeit,” 2f.
Pic of Abraham Kröker from GAMEO.org.
Comments
Post a Comment