Skip to main content

Agitation, Propaganda and Strategies of Survival, 1925

By the end of 1924 Mennonite Central Committee’s food kitchens and feeding operations in the Soviet Union were wrapping up, and the possibilities for mass migration had opened. Refugees had come to the Molotschna settlement from surrounding estates and from villages in the North Caucasus region—now “scattered in various Dorfs (villages), but not equally well received by all Dorfs” (note 1); these were amongst the first chosen for emigration.

In this still new reality there were signs that the community was caught up in a spiritual renewal—noted with special concern in a 1925 “Agitation and Propaganda Department Report.”

“During the last six months [ca. November 1924 to April 1925] the work of Mennonite missionaries and ministers has increased. They agitate for strengthening Mennonite religion and at the same time agitate for emigration. Religious activity in Mennonite colonies is developing without restraint because no proper attention was given to its study.” (Note 2)

Early in 1925, for example, the Chortitza Mennonite Church with some 3,000 to 3,500 members and adherents agreed on a survival strategy of more frequent gathering, teaching, singing and more consistent church discipline, including the ban for those who marry outside the faith:

“The Brotherhood agrees that in order to elevate the ethical and moral condition of our congregation, it is of great importance that, in addition to the usual weekly Sunday worship services, evening worship services as well as regular Bible studies must be instituted. The teaching with the catechumens should start right at the beginning of the church year. Congregational singing is to be enhanced by the choirs, for which our adolescent youth should be engaged. … The Brotherhood also agrees that in recent years congregational discipline has been much too weak, and finds it to be urgently necessary to raise the awareness of congregational discipline … . Every Mennonite must appreciate and value his membership more in the community. On intermarriage, the Brotherhood agrees that this question has been unequivocally decided in our confession [i.e., negative]. … Baptized members who live in civilly sanctioned marriage [only] are also excluded from the community.” (Note 3)

Teachers were increasingly required to be spokespersons for the history and themes of the Revolution. In the same months a clear message was issued to the German villages:

“Teachers must participate actively in social life. They must organize reading halls in the villages, they must strive to acquire books and [Soviet] newspapers—published in German, so that farmers can understand them--especially now, for reading in the winter evenings. They must hold lectures and discussions at least twice a week on all questions that interest the farmers." (Note 4)

Not surprisingly, in Summer 1925 alone some twenty-six Molotschna teachers left for Canada, mostly from the Gnadenfeld district; those who stayed quite to farm (note 5).

In September 1925 as preparations were underway for the eighth anniversary celebrations of the October Revolution, regional Soviet leaders noted the unique difficulty of differentiating “the classes”—i.e., raising class consciousness and the associated class struggle—among the Mennonites. Authorities assessed that this was due to their generally “higher cultural level” and the “high prosperity of poor and middle groups of Mennonite peasantry comparing to respective groups of Ukrainian villages” (note 6).

While the GPU (secret police) and the Agitation and Propaganda Department had some concern about German Lutheran and Catholic clergy in the mid-1920s, they were clearly most concerned, perplexed and frustrated with the Mennonite situation: their “religious caste fanaticism,” isolation, and deeply rooted religious habits, their stubborn unreceptiveness and negative attitude toward Soviet initiatives, directives and “boycotts” of those who join the Poor Peasants Committee, the Lenin Young Communist League or other Soviet organizations; and their dogged commitment to each other—even internationally (note 7).

Village anniversary celebrations for the October Revolution on November 7 (New Style) were non-negotiable and related activities were prescribed in the greatest detail (note 8). The following instructions were distributed to German villages in the Landau Rayon.

By November 5, all yards and streets must be cleaned and swept.

On November 6, evening, a joint solemn public meeting of the village council and all organizations must be convened with reports on the political and economic achievements of the Soviet government, and on the significance of the October Revolution. All public buildings as well as private houses must be decorated with flags.

On November 7, the anniversary of the October Revolution, there must be an unconditional general work stoppage.

At 9 a.m., the youth comrades and military conscripts will march through the village on decorated horses and with caricatures of the leading imperialist rulers on their wagons and with music in the following order: Pioneers, Komsomol, party members, military conscripts and Red Army soldiers (?), women's organizations, professional associations, village council, KNS, (K)?, representatives of the cooperative and the school. Each group will give their welcoming speeches before marching off to the demonstration procession.

At 10 a.m., children must appear at the schools, where teachers must explain the significance of the day. Schools will be closed for classes.

At 11 a.m., all organizations and institutions must gather in front of the village council building, where a report on the history of the October Revolution will be held.

At 12 p.m., the parade will start to march through the village.

The afternoon will be filled with games, sports, and children's dances, etc.

In the evening, free theatrical performances, declamations, songs, and concerts are to be given, in which revolutionary memories are to be woven in.

All schools, reading halls, theaters, village councils, etc., must be decorated with posters, red flags and slogans, and must be open on this day."

These instructions help to reconstruct the atmosphere of German and Mennonite village life in 1925, and the systematic attempts by Ukraine’s Communist Party to compel Mennonite participation in new political “liturgies,” and to form—especially children and youth—for the Soviet socialist citizenship.

A few days after this celebration of the October Revolution in November 1925, the Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party in Ukraine met and discussed again the Mennonite problem. It suggests that Mennonite enthusiasm for the celebrations were more muted than expected.

The Central Bureau resolved to implement more “intensive and systematic work" and political education among "rank-and-file" Mennonites at the village level, in hopes that peasants “from the plow” would gradually be drawn into the party, who would then “carry out the reorganization and thereby liberate themselves from the harmful influence of the [Mennonite] Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage” (note 9).  

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast



---Notes---

Pic: The poster is for the larger Ten Year Anniversary, from Das Neue Dorf, https://martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/de/elektronischer-lesesaal?action=book&bookId=via000389.

Note 1: Example of Schönfeld refugees, in Christian E. Krehbiel’s Journal, May 30, 1922. From Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, MS 11, transcribed by Ruth Unrau. https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_11/.

Note 2: “Report by the Agitation and Propaganda Department of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine regarding issues in German colonies, Late April-early May 1925,” in John B. Toews and Paul Toews, Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine (1922–1927): Mennonite and Soviet Documents, translated by J. B. Toews, O. Shmakina, and W. Regehr (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2011), 270, https://archive.org/details/unionofcitizenso0000unse. Cf. also “Extract from draft decree of Politburo of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine regarding work among the national minorities in Ukraine, January 1927,” in ibid., 329–330.

Note 3: “Protokoll der allgemeinen Bruderschaft der Chortitzer Mennoniten Gemeinde, January 2, 1925.” David G. Rempel Papers, Box 1, File 16. From Thomas Fisher Rare Book Library, University of Toronto. Toronto, ON.

Note 4: "Aufgaben der deutschen Dorfräten," Hammer und Pflug (Organ für die deutschen Kolonisten der Ukraina, Krim und Kaukasiens) 4, no. 39 (January 10, 1925), 1, https://martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/de/elektronischer-lesesaal?action=book&bookId=via000321#lg=1&slide=0.

Note 5: Der Praktische Landwirt 1, no. 7 (December 1925), 12, https://chortitza.org/Pis/PL25_7.pdf.

Note 6: In other reports, Mennonite Union leaders are accused of pursuing a “policy of concealing class contradictions,” and impeding “class stratification” under the “banner of equality and brotherhood inside the community.” Cf. the Report and Conclusions of the “Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine about the Ekaterinoslav Secret Inspection of the Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage, September 1925,” in Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine, 300–303.

Note 7: Cf. the full report of the commission in ibid., 270. The edited volume includes scores of newly translated, Russian language Soviet reports, surveys, and committee minutes.

Note 8: "Plan zur Durchführung des achtjährigen Jubiläums der Oktoberrevolution, den 7/XI, 1925," USSR Landauer Rayons-Vollzugskomitee, Nikolajewer Kreis, Odessaer Gouvernement, from Martin-Opitz Bibliothek elektronischer Lesesaal. There are two iterations of the instructions; the above is a composite of https://martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/de/elektronischer-lesesaal?action=book&bookId=via000116 AND https://martin-opitz-bibliothek.de/de/elektronischer-lesesaal?action=book&bookId=via000108#lg=1&slide=0. 

Note 9: “Minutes of a joint session of the Central Bureau of the German Section of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine with German sections of okrug committees about work with Mennonites November 10–12, 1925,” in Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine (1922–1927): Mennonite and Soviet Documents, translated by J. B. Toews, O. Shmakina, and W. Regehr (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2011), 318-324, https://archive.org/details/unionofcitizenso0000unse. On the Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine, see previous post: https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/1921-formation-of-union-of-citizens-of.html.


Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...
Post a Comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more