Skip to main content

“Why is this happening to us?” (1919): Social Unrest and Mennonite Wealth

Stable political arrangements are rarely permanent and can unravel rapidly—and they did for tens of thousands of Mennonites a century ago in the Russian Empire. Not a few asked: “Why is this happening to us?”

Russia was a multicultural colonial empire with sense of a manifest destiny, a long history of serfdom and displacement of non-settler populations, and a yawning disparity of wealth.

A few hundred Mennonite owners of sprawling estates with extensive landholdings suffered most severely in the first period of lawlessness, chaos and revolution in Ukraine.

During a period of civil war in 1919 when the villages in the Mennonite Molotschna colony were largely under White Army protection, Kornelius Bergmann, a teacher and Mennonite Brethren minister, addressed the question everyone was asking, “Why is this happening to us?”

Bergmann wrote using the pseudonym "C. Orosander"—in order to speak freely (note 1).

He began by admonishing his fellow clergy for general failure of office. “They are the embodied conscience of the people,” but over decades, inner and intra-church conflict, impatience, malice, clerical domination and posturing before state officials defined the sad history of Mennonite church presence in Russia.

Moreover, Bergmann opined that most congregational members were too lazy to think, too cheap and indifferent to questions of church, mission and theological education—which all served to create the conditions for decline and unfaithfulness.

But Bergmann saved his most stinging barbs for the formerly wealthy—the estate owners.

Without question they had “suffered the most—economically, physically and certainly also morally … a large number were murdered, while the rest have moved into our [colony] villages and towns, some in comparatively humble accommodations,” Bergmann recognized.

Notably despite the “general misfortune of this class, there appears to be very little sympathy [from other Mennonites] or pity for these unfortunate ones” in the colony.

Rather the author observed there was a certain “Schadenfreude,” “indifference,” and even “hostility” towards these fellow Mennonites who now seek refuge in the colony. He granted that “envy” and “resentment” are two of the greatest vices among less-wealthy Mennonites, but nevertheless, the estate owners—or “steppe kings”—are solely responsible for this kind of reception.

First—as a teacher—he addressed the abysmal attitude towards education that the formerly wealthy have displayed, not only as patrons for those deserving scholarships, but also towards their own children of both sexes. "What percentage from their own offspring have completed high school, let alone university—especially the females," he asks rhetorically (knowing the percentages are small)?

Bergmann contrasted them with the wealthier classes in Germany who had taken on educational equality for girls in higher schools and university as a priority. But for wealthy Mennonites this has been “unnecessary.” “Learning takes effort, and until now they could go anywhere and do what they desired with empty heads, as long as their pockets were full.” Is it unfair to say they “lack the thirst for knowledge,” he asked?

Lives marked by “alcohol consumption and especially inter-marriage” amongst other vices had made it difficult for the children of these “plutocrats” to advance academically. In addition, they brought a “trained, deeply rooted aversion to any strenuous activity,” which had rendered a significant portion of this class of Mennonites “mentally inferior,” he argued.

The older teens play cards and go on their hunting expeditions, and maidens “eat, drink, dance and flirt with their cousins without any higher ideals of life, until they finally hook up with one of them and then as a couple they continue to live lives that are equally worthless for God and for humanity.” [NB: marriage with close relatives was practiced in order to concentrate wealth].

Of course, he noted, “there are numerous and notable exceptions,” but as a rule this class has “almost never made the interests of the whole [Mennonite peoplehood] their own.” So it is no wonder that now “so few tears flow in our villages” for the empty-handed estate owners.

Again, there were exceptions, but overall the support of Mennonite charitable institutions by Mennonite estate owners was “weak” at best. Bergmann traced the problem back to how these children were raised. “Without having learned the basics of filial-piety” a “caste spirit” developed “that was strictly contrary to our brotherly democratic principle of equality, which simply made them incapable of adapting to other people.” They “did not even want to pay their share of the [Alternative Service] barracks tax while, on the other hand, they generally spared no money to somehow free their sons from the barracks!”

The primary concern of estate owners has always been around land speculation, Bergmann lamented. Their appetite for land has been “insatiable ... the more he has, the more he wants.” “The thought that one’s greed for more land could possibly arouse the envy of the poor seems to have occurred only to a very few. If only they had thought not only of themselves, and had not just stood up for their own interests alone with so much energy! The servants on the estates—and especially the Russian [Ukrainian] seasonal workers—were nothing but poorly paid and very often poorly fed workhorses.”

The author as teacher and minister witnessed this even among the “most pious” estate families. “When times were good they did not make the things of God and of their people their own. And now when times are evil, it is not surprising that neither God nor their people make the cause of the former estate owners their own. As you sow, so shall you reap.”

These are harsh judgments and harsh and too broad. But the class distinctions identified by Bergmann were real, as Henry Goertz painfully recalled 57 years later in a fascinating, wide-ranging interview (audio; note 2).

Goertz’s Molotschna family had been poor, he notes. “Everyone wanted to know whose son you were,” and you were treated accordingly he said. Not only the wealthy Mennonite farmer, but also the Russian [Ukrainian] neighbour knew his economic background; the latter even approached him to join Makhno [Ukrainian anarchist leader]! While Goertz did not join Makhno (he did not hate the rich, because of the way he was brought up, he said), but notes that some Mennonites did.

Goertz volunteered for the Selbstschutz armed Mennonite self-defence, yet decades later still remembered how the same wealthy land owner who treated him poorly not only expected Selbstschutz assistance, but also paid to keep his own sons from Selbstschutz service.

Some two years later (1922), the former estate owners were “scattered in various Molotschna villages, but not all were well-received," as American Mennonite Relief director C. E. Krehbiel observed (note 3; beginnings of MCC). By 1924 in one of the two Molotschna districts (Gnadenfeld), for example, twenty-seven villages were housing 1,800 Mennonite refugees in sheds, barns, cellars, and extra spaces in homes, while another 362 people were completely homeless and living in earthen huts. The norm was two to three, but often five families per house, and most of the refugees were without bedding, soap, or change of clothes (note 4).

The former estate owners were amongst the first chosen for immigration to Canada because of their precarious lot. Immigration leader B.B. Janz could persuade Soviet Authorities that a limited group emigration of 3,000 would be advantageous, especially the formerly wealthy farmers (kulaks) and “starving people whose absence might substantially benefit the colonies and enable economic reconstruction to begin” (note 5).

Many of prejudices and marriage expectations would continue in Canada for a generation.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photos are randomly chosen from the page https://chortitza.org/FB/bguts.html, "Bilder und Fotos mennonitische Gutbesitzer und Guts (Chutors) in Russland."

Note 1: See Kornelius P. Bergmann (pseud. C. Orosander). “Warum geschieht uns solches?,” Part I, Friedensstimme 17 no. 42 (December 14, 1919), 1–2, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk99.pdf; Part II, 17, no. 43 (December 21, 1919), 1–2, https://chortitza.org/pdf/pletk100.pdf. Similarly, cf. previous post for November 1919 editorial by Abraham Kröker (forthcoming).

Note 2: Henry Paetkau, interviewer, “Tape #4 Interview with Henry Goertz,” July 1976, sound recording. Russian-Mennonite immigrants of the 1920’s (Niagara Peninsula), edited by E. Baar, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, http://hdl.handle.net/10464/13713.

Note 3: Example of Schönfeld refugees, in C. E. Krehbiel Journal, May 30, 1922; Mennonite Library and Archives, Bethel College, Newton, KS, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_11/.

Note 4: N. Rempel and A. Brauer, “Report Regarding the Situation of the Refugees in the Gnadenfeld District” (Kharkov, July 22, 1924),” in The Mennonites in Russia from 1917 to 1930. Selected Documents, ed. John B. Toews (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1975), 55f.; John B. Toews, Lost Fatherland (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1977), 170, https://archive.org/details/lostfatherlandst0000toew.

In the years before the war Mennonite farms typically employed three or four domestic servants (Dienstbote) and “almost exclusively Russian,” according to Muntau farmer and Halbstadt elder Heinrich P. Unruh (Heinrich P. Unruh to Helena Unruh Richert Balzer, May 2, 1914, 2, letter, from Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/mf_chr_34/15.jpg). H. P. Unruh employed “from October 1 to May 9, two males (three in spring) and one female, and together they receive a salary of 500 to 550 rubles.”

Note 5: Toews, Lost Fatherland, 132f.; 140. Cf. “Minutes of the Union Board Meeting, May 7–8, 1924” also (Resolution of the Verband on emigration, Feb. 26–28, 1925) in Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine (1922–1927): Mennonite and Soviet Documents, translated by J. B. Toews, O. Shmakina, and W. Regehr (Fresno, CA: Center for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 2011), 215f.; 220f., https://archive.org/details/unionofcitizenso0000unse.

For further reading, see James Urry, "Through the Eye of a Needle: Wealth and the Mennonite Experience in Imperial Russia," Journal of Mennonite Studies 3 (1985), 7-35. https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/42/42.





Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Mobile Immigration Central Office (EWZ) Trains and Naturalization, 1943-44

They walked in one end as Soviet citizens, proceeded through a few wagons, and emerged out the other end as naturalized citizens of the German Reich . Below is a newspaper article marking the completion of the registration and naturalization of some 35,000 Mennonite resettlers—plus other Black Sea Germans. By July 1944 all the treks or transports had arrived from the Black Sea region into Greater Germany [most in Warthegau], and almost all were now registered for a more permanent settlement situation in German-annexed Poland—or so they thought. The translation is important because it offers a clear account of the process of naturalization, application and assessment. While not all Mennonites evacuated from Ukraine 1943-44 were naturalized in one of the visiting mobile Immigration Central Office trains, most were. The article and photos fill a gap in our knowledge of that experience in Nazi Germany and how naturalization was approached and experienced by some 30,000-plus Mennonites....

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...