Skip to main content

Molotschna “Philosopher of Anabaptism”? Heinrich Balzer, 1800-1846

Heinrich Balzer (1800-1846) has been called "the philosopher” of the Molotschna. In a unique 1833 treatise Balzer provided “a possible philosophical foundation for the Mennonite faith as it was developed by the early Swiss Brethren and Menno Simons," as assessed by Anabaptist historian Robert Friedman. Its 10 pages appear to be "entirely in the spirit of early Anabaptism"(note 1).

J. Denny Weaver—who like Friedmann is most at home with American Swiss Mennonite thought—summarized it as a “philosophical” argument for conservative Mennonitism and community maintenance (note 2).

Even James Urry, our best Russian Mennonite historian, does not strongly challenge this reading. Urry’s essay on Balzer however is important for understanding the social and religious world of the text in the 1820s and 1830s. Balzer’s distinctive contribution, according to Urry, 

“... was to add a new dimension built on reaction to post-Reformation developments in theology and secular philosophy which debated the role of reason in human affairs.” Urry points out Balzer’s “understanding of recent developments in ideas and their application to human affairs,” and concludes that Balzer was “an informed, intellectual conservative by choice, rather than a conservative holding onto perceived traditions out of ignorance or stubborn narrow mindedness.” (Note 3)

Balzer was reacting to friendly encouragement for educational reform by the state. In fact “by imperial decree” a model for church and school advancement penned by—and here is the problem—a liberal Mennonite in Germany, Abraham Hunzinger, was recommended to the colonists for consideration (note 4). Though written by a Mennonite, the book triggered Balzer’s hefty response (see post on Hunzinger’s booklet, note 5).

At this point Balzer was a 33-year-old lay minister. Born in 1800 he arrived to New Russia at about 19 with other Frisian Mennonites who together established the Molotschna Rudnerweide Church. His level of writing suggests he had experienced solid Prussian schooling; he also came from a line of ministers. In recent years he had lived close to the village of Ohrloff, where Johann Cornies’ lending library was accessible. Moreover Balzer could marshal scripture easily.

In his short treatise Balzer is sufficiently confident to spar with the enlightenment thinker Immanuel Kant, and his distinctions between Verstand and Vernunft (understanding and reason). Without explicitly naming his targets, Balzer lamented the fact that the “simple Word of God is too naked and too meagre for the intellectuals” and argued their “enlightenment of the head” has turned genuine evangelical faith into “an absurd superstition.” In contrast, it is the “Father of Light” and the Holy Spirit alone who give right wisdom and understanding, for salvation is beyond the limits of reason. First-century believers knew this and “intentionally fled” “worldly scholarship and philosophy,” as did Menno Simons, according to Balzer. They knew that “worldly honors, high repute, elated rank, and the pleasures of social life” were a “mere sham and smoke. The lowest rank in society seemed to them the fittest” (note 6). It is perhaps correct to call this a quasi philosophical—albeit conservative—piece.

There are, however, a few previously unnoticed and new puzzle pieces to consider.

First, P. M. Friesen’s Mennonite history notes that in 1832 Cornies’ secretary, Heinrich Heese, receipted Jakob Martens, a book-seller in the village of Tiegenhagen and later minister, for 100 copies of Return of our Lord, 5 copies of Heart of Man, and 10 copies of Passport of a Christian (note 7). Friesen records this detail merely to show off the pious letter penned by Heese.

From the recently published Cornies correspondence, we now know that in Fall 1826 a crate filled with 550 copies of these three titles and two others arrived in the Molotschna from State Counsellor Inspector and author Gottlieb Schuberth, a Lutheran friend in St. Petersburg—who had “a special preference” for Mennonites and who felt compelled to send the books “to promote [God’s] kingdom and His reception in all hearts” (note 8).

That in itself does not solve the mystery; but their contents do. The 1822 Leipziger Literarzeitung gives us a brief literature review and summary with excerpts on four titles (note 9). The reviewer notes that these volumes are "a faithful representation of the reigning religious mindset prevalent in many estates and classes in St. Petersburg."

Among other things, they are popular and pietistic reactions to a caricature of German Idealism. They are not Anabaptistic. A close reading shows that these volumes gave Balzer the religious language and categories to voice his moral outrage at “liberal” tendencies in the community, including the arrival of Hunzinger’s book.

For example, Schubeth's Messiasfreund (Friend of the Messiah, for Believers and Disciples of Jesus Christ: Christ our Wisdom; see note 10) includes an extended, popular critique of newer, enlightenment academic philosophy—including of the “crazy Kantians”—of university-based theology and exegesis, and of natural reason uninformed by revelation.

Balzer adopts Schuberth's account of “accommodation-systems,” and argues that “when men began to blend the simple teachings of the Gospel with all kinds of interpretations and expositions, and to match them with philosophical tenets, then they began to conform themselves to this world of all things.” Etc.

A second example is Das Herz des Menschen (The Heart of Man: The Temple of God or the Workshop of Satan; note 11). Balzer's piece shows great interest in the agency of the “Evil One” in human life (already in his second sentence of the treatise!), and this booklet is his inspiration. Though he never cites these sources, the dependence is obvious. The booklet seeks to revive and encourage the Christian on his/her walk.

Third, Reise-Paß eines Christen (Passport of a Christian; note 12) is a twenty-page booklet of poetry describing the pilgrim, disciple and servant of Christ, his character, stature and lifestyle. This too is a central concern of Balzer.

Fourth, Biblische Geschichten (note 13) is different and has little to contribute to Balzer's treatise specifically. It is a collection of selected biblical stories briefly paraphrased designed for schools in Baden, but rejected there because of Pietist criticism of the writing’s apparent rationalist assumptions. That does not seem obvious when reading the volume. For those who find reading the Bible too complicated, this reader helps, and it is easy to see why it was welcomed generally as Cornies' letter indicates.

Fifth, Wiederkunft unsers Herrn (The Return of our Lord, or a view toward the Flock to be gathered of the one Shepherd; note 14)—by the same press and likely same author as Messiasfreund, emphasizes the moral role of the disciple as representative of the Lord until his return (see also p. 1 of Balzer).

There is significant interest in the Molotschna for The Return of the Lord and its themes: the 1826 crate had 100 copies; 88 copies were sold by August 30, 1829 (note 15); and Friesen tells us that in 1832 Heese was shipping out another 100 copies!

We only have a summary of Return of the Lord (note 16), and it seems entirely consistent with Schuberth's warnings against the cold academic, enlightenment approach of many Christian writers in his day: for the writer, the culture of reason has overtaken the heart and over-stepped its limits—which is at the heart of Balzer's treatise.

Balzer, a philosopher of Anabaptism? We have two sermons by Balzer and his "Epic Poem" for reference (note 16). These make scant reference to Menno Simons; Dirk Philips, Pieter Pietersz, the Martyrs Mirror or other pillars of the tradition are never mentioned.

Friedmann is known for his criticisms of German Pietism and its history (in his view) of creeping into Anabaptist communities and distorting their spirituality (see note 17). Friedmann would have criticized the volumes above—yet he has nothing but praise for Balzer's "Anabaptist" treatise, knowing nothing about the influences behind it.

Because these volumes were in such wide circulation in the Molotschna, Balzer's contemporaries must have seen all of these connections; none of them comment on his unique brilliance or of an original rediscovery of Anabaptism. In Cornies' assessment, Balzer was a struggling thinker at best. Two years earlier Cornies wrote his Swiss missionary friend Schlatter that even Balzer has “settled down.” His “preaching is unctuous and fiery, but without much thought. He often speaks about you and admits his errors. He has not really agreed with [Teacher Tobias] Voth for some time (or perhaps the reverse). He no longer improvises as he preaches … [and is] now coherent. The upper Iushanle [River] area sleeps on” (note 18). Even if Balzer was not uniquely brilliant, the crate of books and Balzer’s treatise still offers a valuable glimpse into that Mennonite world and its debates.

             ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Heinrich Balzer, “Faith and Reason: The Principles of Mennonitism Reconsidered, in a Treatise of 1833,” translated and edited by Robert Friedmann, Mennonite Quarterly Review 22, no. 2 (1948), 75–93; 77. Republished in Delbert Plett, ed., The Golden Years (Steinbach: Self-published, 1985), 237-247, https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1216/.

Note 2: J. Denny Weaver, “Anabaptist Theology in Face of Modernity: Why Theology Matters,” Preservings 19 (2001), 3–18; see pp. 13-14, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/19/.

Note 3: James Urry, “Ohm Heinrich Balzer 1800–46, Tiege,” Preservings 24 (2004), 12–15; 14, https://www.plettfoundation.org/preservings/archive/24/.

Note 4: Abraham Hunzinger, Das Religions-, Kirchen- und Schulwesen der Mennoniten oder Taufgesinnten (Speyer: Kob’schen, 1830), https://books.google.ca/books?id=5ENBAAAAcAAJ&printsec=. See also Balzer’s “Epistle to the Aeltesten, 1833” (and pic), warning readers of the Hunzinger volume, in Plett, Golden Years¸ 218–220.

Note 5: See previous post on Molotschna reception of Hunzinger, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/01/ideas-for-educational-reform-1832.html. 

Note 6: Balzer, “Faith and Reason,” 83-91. NB: Kant does not appear in the Cornies’ lending library; on the library and list of volumes, see (...forthcoming).

Note 7: Peter M. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978), 699, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/page/n735.

Note 8: Transformation on the Southern Ukrainian Steppe: Letters and Papers of Johann Cornies, vol. 1, trans. and ed. Harvey L. Dyck, Ingrid I. Epp, and John R. Staples (Toronto: University of Toronto, 2015), 92.

Note 9: See review in Leipziger Literaturzeitung 129 (May 1822), 1027-29, https://books.google.ca/books?id=rdXSK8vg7JoC&pg=PA1027#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 10: Gottlieb H. Schuberth, Messiasfreund. Für die Bekenner und Nachfolger Jesu Christi (St. Petersburg, 1818), https://www.google.ca/books/edition/Der_Messiasfreund_etc/PfNhAAAAcAAJ?hl.

Note 11: Johannes Gossner, Das Herz des Menschen: ein Tempel Gottes oder eine Werkstätte des Satans, in zehn Figuren sinnbildlich dargestellt, 2nd ed. (Augsburg, 1813), https://books.google.ca/books?id=ijpMAAAAYAAJ&.

Note 12: Reise-Paß eines Christen (St. Petersburg: Iversen, 1821), 20 pp. See Leipziger Literaturzeitung, part 1 (1822), col. 1029, https://books.google.ca/books?id=arRFAAAAcAAJ&newbks=; also, Der Gesellschafter oder Blätter für Geist und Herz: ein Volksblatt, vol. 6 (December 1822), 218, https://books.google.ca/books?id=7FVEAAAAcAAJ&newbks.

Note 13: Johann P. Hebels, Biblische Geschichten (Stuttgart: Cotta’schen, 1824), https://books.google.ca/books?id=DHlHAAAAIAAJ&.

Note 14: Wiederkunft unsers Herrn, oder Ein Blick auf die zu sammelnde Heerde des einen Hirten (St. Petersburg: Gräff /Iversen, 1820).

Note 15: “No. 181, Tobias Voth to Johann Cornies, 30 August 1829,” in Cornies, Transformation I, 181.

Note 16: See Leipziger Literaturzeitung above.

Note 17: See Balzer, "Epic Poem," in Leaders of the Mennonite Kleine Gemeinde in Russia, 1812–1874, ed. D. Plett, 295–353 (Steinbach, MB: Crossway, 1993), https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1261/.

Note 18: Cf. Robert Friedmann, Mennonite Piety Through the Centuries (Goshen, IN: Mennonite Historical Society, 1949), https://archive.org/details/mennonitepietyth0000frie.

Note 19: Cornies, Letter March 12, 1830, Transformation, vol. 1.




Print Friendly and PDF
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...
Post a Comment
Read more

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...
Post a Comment
Read more

What does it cost to settle a Refugee? Basic without Medical Care (1930)

In January 1930, the Mennonite Central Committee was scrambling to get 3,885 Mennonites out of Germany and settled somewhere fast. These refugees had fled via Moscow in December 1929, and Germany was willing only to serve as first transit stop ( note 1 ). Canada was very reluctant to take any German-speaking Mennonites—the Great Depression had begun and a negative memory of war resistance still lingered. In the end Canada took 1,344 Mennonites and the USA took none born in Russia. Paraguay was the next best option ( note 2 ). The German government preferred Brazil, but Brazil would not guarantee freedom from military service, which was a problem for American Mennonite financiers. There were already some conservative "cousins" from Manitoba in Paraguay who had negotiated with the government and learned through trial and error how to survive in the "Green Hell" of the Paraguayan Chaco. MCC with the assistance of a German aid organization purchased and distribute...
Post a Comment
Read more

More Royal News! Mennonites give gifts of “Oxen, Butter, Ducks, Hens & Cheese” to new King (1772)

What do Mennonites offer a new king? The ritual ceremonies of homage to a new European king—as we see on TV these days--are ancient. Exactly 250 years yesterday, Frederick the Great became king over Mennonites in the Vistula River Delta where most of our ancestors lived. Here is how that played out. On May 31, 1772, Heinrich Donner was elected elder of the Orlofferfelde Mennonite Church, 25 km north of Marienburg Castle in Polish-Prussia; thankfully he kept a diary ( note 1 ). Only a few months later the weak Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth collapsed and was partitioned by powerful, land-hungry neighbours: Austria, Prussia and Catherine the Great’s empire. In the preceding decades Mennonites had lived with significant autonomy, felt secure under the Polish crown and could appeal to the king for protection . Now some 2,638 Mennonite families were under Prussian rule. Frederick II took possession of his new lands on September 13, and then invited four persons of nobility plus clergy from ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Molotschna: The final months, Summer 1943

These photos are from German propaganda material filmed in Molotschna (called "Halbstadt") in 1943—just a few months before the evacuation from Ukraine and trek to German-annexed Poland (Warthegau). Not all of the film is of the Mennonite settlement, however, but much of it is. Below are some frames from the film. The edited shorter version is of higher quality and designed as propaganda to be consumed by Germans in the Reich and to secure their approval .  The scenes are marked by cleanliness, orderliness and discipline. There is economic activity, a model Kindergarten, and always happy ethnic German people in the newly occupied territories. A predominantly Mennonite Cavalry Regiment (Waffen-SS) guarding Ukrainian and Russian workers is also highlighted. This hard to see and disturbing. Anything that may have been good here for Mennonites meant enslavement, hunger and death for untold numbers of others. Two versions of the film are available: Shorter (edited for l...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flemish Anabaptists and Witch Hunts

Political leaders have long used the term "witch hunt"--and there is an historical connection to Mennonites. Anabaptists and so-called “witches” were arrested and tried for related reasons in the Low Countries in the 1500s: namely, as a means to divert God’s wrath. The late-Medievals feared that heresy—in this case ana-baptism and the challenge to other sacraments—invited the wrath of God, and was an instrument for the devil’s own hellish apocalyptic assault. The assumption: the devil's tactics to destroy Christendom included the use of both heretics and sorcerers. Gary Waite writes convincingly that both were seen as “polluting” the community and thus both had to be "excised." "This fear of pollution, or scandalizing God or the saints, also explains why small numbers of peaceable Mennonites were so harshly treated during the second half of the sixteenth century. Plagues, fires, and economic and social crises were often blamed on the presence of even a smal...
Post a Comment
Read more