Skip to main content

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation (note 1). For a millennium re-baptism (ana-baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death (note 2), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism.

Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far East. In these cities new ideas were also in wide circulation, like those of the Genevan reformer John Calvin, the German reformer Martin Luther, and the peaceful Dutch Anabaptist leader Menno Simons among others.

There are many good sources that tell the well-researched, broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. In this blog I offer a few posts related to the city of Bruges--just to give that larger story local profile and an anchor. I think Bruges offers a representative picture of early Anabaptist life and important themes for the longer Mennonite story. But of course other cities could be used too.

Because so many people journeyed through Flemish Hansa cities like Bruges and sought work in its industries, it became a relatively attractive and safe place for people looking for new opportunities or for refuge. Fleeing Anabaptists could be hired for their labour and skills and also connect discreetly with like-minded believers eager to read scripture (the printing press is still relatively new) and explore what obedience and faith might require. Thee first executions of Anabaptists here occurred in 1538. Judicial minutes of November 26, 1561 record the imprisonment of twelve “defenseless” Anabaptists and also note that many “strangers were hiding” in the city, “including fugitives and other suspicious people forced to leave other areas because of heresy.” Amongst latter were “English heterodox believers” and apostate monks “dogmatizing and perverting the people” (note 3). It was in this religiously fertile and dangerous environment that Anabaptist–Mennonite spiritual path found its earliest definitions and patterns.

Most Bruges Anabaptists however had been baptized elsewhere by Dutch and Flemish missionary elders ordained and sent by Menno Simons; Leenaert Bouwens alone reportedly baptized more than 10,000 people. At least one Bruges Anabaptist, Eva Pieters, had been baptized before Menno's conversion by Jan Matthysz, the militant Anabaptist leader in the city of Münster. In 1534, Anabaptists who found refuge in Münster had attempted to establish an “Anabaptist kingdom” with the forceful uprooting of "the ungodly" in anticipation of the coming “New Jerusalem” (note 4). This holy experiment was marked by a variety of excesses including polygamy and the community of goods as they awaited the end-time apocalyptic battle between good and evil. This ended disastrously: the armies of the bishop besieged the city and, once inside, killed almost all the men. The three leaders were caged, severely tortured, displayed throughout the country, and put to death six months later. The next year another 300 Münsterites, and possibly Menno’s brother, occupied a monastery in Friesland near Bolsward, where 37 were beheaded immediately, and another 54 later.

These events moved Menno profoundly and he left the priesthood to become a shepherd to those “poor straying sheep”—like Eva Pieters—“and [to] direct the wandering flock…to the true pastures of Christ” (note 5).

The term “Mennonite” was adopted by several Anabaptist groups a decade later after the tolerant Countess of East Friesland, Anna von Oldenburg, insisted on distinguishing between the “fanatical” Münsterite Anabaptists and the peaceful Menniten—followers of Menno (note 6).

Leaders like Menno Simons and other re-baptizers in Switzerland and South Germany sought in different ways to gather a people who desired to “walk in the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (note 7). The Apostle Paul spoke of being “buried with Christ” in baptism and raised with him in faith (Colossians 2:12), so that “we too might walk in the newness of life” (Romans 6:4; note 8). In this spirit, Menno Simons entitled his first published pamphlet after his renunciation of the papal church in 1536: “The Spiritual Resurrection” (note 9). For Menno, to walk in the resurrection meant putting away the old person of sin and putting on the new person of holiness, and a way of life marked by love toward all people. This call was couched in the millennial assumption that God’s coming kingdom of peace was already breaking in, making participation in that new life possible.

The experiment in Bruges was broadly consistent with the spiritual practices of diverse Anabaptist communities across Europe in the sixteenth century. What hopes compelled them to make these choices? As part of an apocalyptically saturated late mediaeval world, believers’ baptism in Bruges and elsewhere was the sign that would save in the Day of Judgment (note 10). Mennonite theologian Thomas Finger captures the importance of this expectation: “If Jesus has already conquered the powers of evil and if he will surely return to consummate all of God’s plans, then no situation of evil, tragedy, or despair can be as threatening as it looks. It must pass away” (note 11). Premised on the presence of the risen Christ through God’s Spirit, “they held to the conviction that the process of attaining salvation would involve a painful process of renouncing self and following after Jesus Christ into the suffering and the cross” (note 12).

How one could or should "walk" if this is the case was never obvious. But a tradition developed roughly around that question as well as a community of practice that adapted, experimented, and at times even reinvented itself beyond recognition.

This short vignette recalls some of the beginnings that are critical for understanding the decisions and conflicts that shaped the longer Russian Mennonite journey (note 13).

                        --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: On the origins, see C. Arnold Snyder, Anabaptist History and Theology: An Introduction (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 1995).

Note 2: Code of Justinian, Bk. I, title VI.2 (To Avoid the Repetition of Baptism), The Emperors Honorius and Theodosius to Anthemius, Praetorian Prefect, AD 413, in Samuel P. Scott, ed., The Civil Law, vol. 12 (Cincinnati, OH: Central Trust, 1932), XII, 72, https://constitution.org/2-Authors/sps/sps.htm.

Note 3: A. C. de Schrevel, ed., Histoire Séminaire de Bruges, vol. 1 (Bruges: de Planke, 1895), 690, 691, n.2. https://books.google.ca/books?id=sms0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA691#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 4: Cf. Walter Klaassen, Living at the End of the Ages. Apocalyptic Expectation in the Radical Reformation (New York: University of America Press, 1992), 45-51.

Note 5: Menno Simons, “Reply to Gellius Faber,” in The Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 670. For Menno's writings online, see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html.

Note 6: Anna Oldenburg-Delmenhorst, “On the Treatment of Sectarians,” February 15, 1545, in A. F. Mellink, ed., Documenta Anabaptistica Nederlandica. Part I: Friesland en Groningen (1530–1550) (Leiden: Brill, 1975), 190.

Note 7: Cf. the unique use of the term in article one of the early Swiss and South German “Schleitheim Confession (1527),” in Howard John Loewen, One Lord, One Church, One Hope, One God: Mennonite Confessions of Faith, Text-Reader Series 2 (Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies, 1985), 79-84, https://archive.org/details/onelordonechurch02loew/.

Note 8: Simons, “Foundation,” Complete Writings, 122 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 9: Simons, “The Spiritual Resurrection,” Complete Writings, 5162 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 10: Cf. Sjouke Voolstra, “True Penitence: The Core of Menno Simons’ Theology,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 387–400.

Note 11: Thomas Finger, Christian Theology: An Eschatological Approach, vol. 1 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1985), 102, https://archive.org/details/christiantheolog0000fing.

Note 12: Snyder, Following in the Footsteps of Christ, 48. On the defining significance of “long-suffering” (lijdtsaemheyt) in the writings of Jacob de Roore and Flemish Anabaptists generally, cf. Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 326f.

Note 13: There are many very good sources that rehearse the well-researched anbd broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. I offer a few posts here related to the city of Bruges to give that larger story a local profile.


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

“Operation Chortitza” (Part II) – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44

Waldemar Janzen, my former German professor and advisee, turned eleven years old in 1943. He and his mother and 3,900 others from Chortitza and Rosenthal (Ukraine) were evacuated west to the ethnic German resettler camps in Gau Danzig-West Prussia in October that year (see Part I; note 1 ). Years later Janzen could still recall much from this childhood experience—including the impact of the visit by Professor Benjamin H. Unruh a few weeks after their arrival. “He was a man who had extended much help to his fellow Mennonites ever since they began to emigrate from Russia during the 1920s” ( note 2 ). Unruh was a father-figure to his people, and his arrival at their camp in West Prussia signaled to the evacuees that they were in good hands ( note 3 ). Unruh’s impact on 7,000 other Chortitza District villagers in Upper Silesia would be the same some weeks later ( note 4 ). Surprisingly Unruh’s West Prussian camps visit left an equally indelible impression on the Gau’s Operations Commande...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Warthegau, Nazism and two 15-year-old Mennonites, 1944

Katharina Esau offered me a home away from home when I was a student in Germany in the 1980s. The Soviet Union released her and her family in 1972. Käthe Heinrichs—her maiden name (b. Aug. 18, 1928)—and my Uncle Walter Bräul were classmates in Gnadenfeld during Nazi occupation of Ukraine, and experienced the Gnadenfeld group “trek” as 15-year-olds together. Before she passed, she wrote her story ( note 1 )—and I had opportunity to interview my uncle. Käthe and Walter both arrived in Warthegau—German annexed Poland—in March 1944 ( note 2 ), and the Reich had a plan for their lives. In February 1944, the Governor of Warthegau ordered the Hitler Youth (HJ) organization to “care for Black Sea German youth” ( note 3 ). Youth were examined for the Hitler Youth, but also for suitability for elite tracks like the one-year Landjahr (farm year and service) program. The highly politicized training of the Landjahr was available for young people in Hitler Youth and its counterpart the League of G...