Skip to main content

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation (note 1). For a millennium re-baptism (ana-baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death (note 2), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism.

Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far East. In these cities new ideas were also in wide circulation, like those of the Genevan reformer John Calvin, the German reformer Martin Luther, and the peaceful Dutch Anabaptist leader Menno Simons among others.

There are many good sources that tell the well-researched, broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. In this blog I offer a few posts related to the city of Bruges--just to give that larger story local profile and an anchor. I think Bruges offers a representative picture of early Anabaptist life and important themes for the longer Mennonite story. But of course other cities could be used too.

Because so many people journeyed through Flemish Hansa cities like Bruges and sought work in its industries, it became a relatively attractive and safe place for people looking for new opportunities or for refuge. Fleeing Anabaptists could be hired for their labour and skills and also connect discreetly with like-minded believers eager to read scripture (the printing press is still relatively new) and explore what obedience and faith might require. Thee first executions of Anabaptists here occurred in 1538. Judicial minutes of November 26, 1561 record the imprisonment of twelve “defenseless” Anabaptists and also note that many “strangers were hiding” in the city, “including fugitives and other suspicious people forced to leave other areas because of heresy.” Amongst latter were “English heterodox believers” and apostate monks “dogmatizing and perverting the people” (note 3). It was in this religiously fertile and dangerous environment that Anabaptist–Mennonite spiritual path found its earliest definitions and patterns.

Most Bruges Anabaptists however had been baptized elsewhere by Dutch and Flemish missionary elders ordained and sent by Menno Simons; Leenaert Bouwens alone reportedly baptized more than 10,000 people. At least one Bruges Anabaptist, Eva Pieters, had been baptized before Menno's conversion by Jan Matthysz, the militant Anabaptist leader in the city of Münster. In 1534, Anabaptists who found refuge in Münster had attempted to establish an “Anabaptist kingdom” with the forceful uprooting of "the ungodly" in anticipation of the coming “New Jerusalem” (note 4). This holy experiment was marked by a variety of excesses including polygamy and the community of goods as they awaited the end-time apocalyptic battle between good and evil. This ended disastrously: the armies of the bishop besieged the city and, once inside, killed almost all the men. The three leaders were caged, severely tortured, displayed throughout the country, and put to death six months later. The next year another 300 Münsterites, and possibly Menno’s brother, occupied a monastery in Friesland near Bolsward, where 37 were beheaded immediately, and another 54 later.

These events moved Menno profoundly and he left the priesthood to become a shepherd to those “poor straying sheep”—like Eva Pieters—“and [to] direct the wandering flock…to the true pastures of Christ” (note 5).

The term “Mennonite” was adopted by several Anabaptist groups a decade later after the tolerant Countess of East Friesland, Anna von Oldenburg, insisted on distinguishing between the “fanatical” Münsterite Anabaptists and the peaceful Menniten—followers of Menno (note 6).

Leaders like Menno Simons and other re-baptizers in Switzerland and South Germany sought in different ways to gather a people who desired to “walk in the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (note 7). The Apostle Paul spoke of being “buried with Christ” in baptism and raised with him in faith (Colossians 2:12), so that “we too might walk in the newness of life” (Romans 6:4; note 8). In this spirit, Menno Simons entitled his first published pamphlet after his renunciation of the papal church in 1536: “The Spiritual Resurrection” (note 9). For Menno, to walk in the resurrection meant putting away the old person of sin and putting on the new person of holiness, and a way of life marked by love toward all people. This call was couched in the millennial assumption that God’s coming kingdom of peace was already breaking in, making participation in that new life possible.

The experiment in Bruges was broadly consistent with the spiritual practices of diverse Anabaptist communities across Europe in the sixteenth century. What hopes compelled them to make these choices? As part of an apocalyptically saturated late mediaeval world, believers’ baptism in Bruges and elsewhere was the sign that would save in the Day of Judgment (note 10). Mennonite theologian Thomas Finger captures the importance of this expectation: “If Jesus has already conquered the powers of evil and if he will surely return to consummate all of God’s plans, then no situation of evil, tragedy, or despair can be as threatening as it looks. It must pass away” (note 11). Premised on the presence of the risen Christ through God’s Spirit, “they held to the conviction that the process of attaining salvation would involve a painful process of renouncing self and following after Jesus Christ into the suffering and the cross” (note 12).

How one could or should "walk" if this is the case was never obvious. But a tradition developed roughly around that question as well as a community of practice that adapted, experimented, and at times even reinvented itself beyond recognition.

This short vignette recalls some of the beginnings that are critical for understanding the decisions and conflicts that shaped the longer Russian Mennonite journey (note 13).

                        --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: On the origins, see C. Arnold Snyder, Anabaptist History and Theology: An Introduction (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 1995).

Note 2: Code of Justinian, Bk. I, title VI.2 (To Avoid the Repetition of Baptism), The Emperors Honorius and Theodosius to Anthemius, Praetorian Prefect, AD 413, in Samuel P. Scott, ed., The Civil Law, vol. 12 (Cincinnati, OH: Central Trust, 1932), XII, 72, https://constitution.org/2-Authors/sps/sps.htm.

Note 3: A. C. de Schrevel, ed., Histoire Séminaire de Bruges, vol. 1 (Bruges: de Planke, 1895), 690, 691, n.2. https://books.google.ca/books?id=sms0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA691#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 4: Cf. Walter Klaassen, Living at the End of the Ages. Apocalyptic Expectation in the Radical Reformation (New York: University of America Press, 1992), 45-51.

Note 5: Menno Simons, “Reply to Gellius Faber,” in The Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 670. For Menno's writings online, see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html.

Note 6: Anna Oldenburg-Delmenhorst, “On the Treatment of Sectarians,” February 15, 1545, in A. F. Mellink, ed., Documenta Anabaptistica Nederlandica. Part I: Friesland en Groningen (1530–1550) (Leiden: Brill, 1975), 190.

Note 7: Cf. the unique use of the term in article one of the early Swiss and South German “Schleitheim Confession (1527),” in Howard John Loewen, One Lord, One Church, One Hope, One God: Mennonite Confessions of Faith, Text-Reader Series 2 (Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies, 1985), 79-84, https://archive.org/details/onelordonechurch02loew/.

Note 8: Simons, “Foundation,” Complete Writings, 122 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 9: Simons, “The Spiritual Resurrection,” Complete Writings, 5162 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 10: Cf. Sjouke Voolstra, “True Penitence: The Core of Menno Simons’ Theology,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 387–400.

Note 11: Thomas Finger, Christian Theology: An Eschatological Approach, vol. 1 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1985), 102, https://archive.org/details/christiantheolog0000fing.

Note 12: Snyder, Following in the Footsteps of Christ, 48. On the defining significance of “long-suffering” (lijdtsaemheyt) in the writings of Jacob de Roore and Flemish Anabaptists generally, cf. Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 326f.

Note 13: There are many very good sources that rehearse the well-researched anbd broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. I offer a few posts here related to the city of Bruges to give that larger story a local profile.


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Landless Crisis: Molotschna, 1840s to 1860s

The landless crisis in the mid-1800s in the Molotschna Colony is the context for most other matters of importance to its Mennonites, 1840s to 1860s. When discussing landlessness, historian David G. Rempel has claimed that the “seemingly endemic wranglings and splits” of the Mennonite church in South Russia were only seldom or superficially related to doctrine, and “almost invariably and intimately bound up with some of the most serious social and economic issues” that afflicted one or more of the congregations in the settlement ( note 1 ). It is important from the start to recognize that these Mennonites were not citizens,  but foreign colonists with obligations and privileges that governed their sojourn in New Russia. For Mennonites the privileges, e.g. of land and freedom from military conscription, were connected to the obligation of model farming. Mennonites were given one, and then later two districts of land for this purpose. Within their districts or colonies , villages w...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...