Skip to main content

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation (note 1). For a millennium re-baptism (ana-baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death (note 2), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism.

Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far East. In these cities new ideas were also in wide circulation, like those of the Genevan reformer John Calvin, the German reformer Martin Luther, and the peaceful Dutch Anabaptist leader Menno Simons among others.

There are many good sources that tell the well-researched, broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. In this blog I offer a few posts related to the city of Bruges--just to give that larger story local profile and an anchor. I think Bruges offers a representative picture of early Anabaptist life and important themes for the longer Mennonite story. But of course other cities could be used too.

Because so many people journeyed through Flemish Hansa cities like Bruges and sought work in its industries, it became a relatively attractive and safe place for people looking for new opportunities or for refuge. Fleeing Anabaptists could be hired for their labour and skills and also connect discreetly with like-minded believers eager to read scripture (the printing press is still relatively new) and explore what obedience and faith might require. Thee first executions of Anabaptists here occurred in 1538. Judicial minutes of November 26, 1561 record the imprisonment of twelve “defenseless” Anabaptists and also note that many “strangers were hiding” in the city, “including fugitives and other suspicious people forced to leave other areas because of heresy.” Amongst latter were “English heterodox believers” and apostate monks “dogmatizing and perverting the people” (note 3). It was in this religiously fertile and dangerous environment that Anabaptist–Mennonite spiritual path found its earliest definitions and patterns.

Most Bruges Anabaptists however had been baptized elsewhere by Dutch and Flemish missionary elders ordained and sent by Menno Simons; Leenaert Bouwens alone reportedly baptized more than 10,000 people. At least one Bruges Anabaptist, Eva Pieters, had been baptized before Menno's conversion by Jan Matthysz, the militant Anabaptist leader in the city of Münster. In 1534, Anabaptists who found refuge in Münster had attempted to establish an “Anabaptist kingdom” with the forceful uprooting of "the ungodly" in anticipation of the coming “New Jerusalem” (note 4). This holy experiment was marked by a variety of excesses including polygamy and the community of goods as they awaited the end-time apocalyptic battle between good and evil. This ended disastrously: the armies of the bishop besieged the city and, once inside, killed almost all the men. The three leaders were caged, severely tortured, displayed throughout the country, and put to death six months later. The next year another 300 Münsterites, and possibly Menno’s brother, occupied a monastery in Friesland near Bolsward, where 37 were beheaded immediately, and another 54 later.

These events moved Menno profoundly and he left the priesthood to become a shepherd to those “poor straying sheep”—like Eva Pieters—“and [to] direct the wandering flock…to the true pastures of Christ” (note 5).

The term “Mennonite” was adopted by several Anabaptist groups a decade later after the tolerant Countess of East Friesland, Anna von Oldenburg, insisted on distinguishing between the “fanatical” Münsterite Anabaptists and the peaceful Menniten—followers of Menno (note 6).

Leaders like Menno Simons and other re-baptizers in Switzerland and South Germany sought in different ways to gather a people who desired to “walk in the resurrection of Jesus Christ” (note 7). The Apostle Paul spoke of being “buried with Christ” in baptism and raised with him in faith (Colossians 2:12), so that “we too might walk in the newness of life” (Romans 6:4; note 8). In this spirit, Menno Simons entitled his first published pamphlet after his renunciation of the papal church in 1536: “The Spiritual Resurrection” (note 9). For Menno, to walk in the resurrection meant putting away the old person of sin and putting on the new person of holiness, and a way of life marked by love toward all people. This call was couched in the millennial assumption that God’s coming kingdom of peace was already breaking in, making participation in that new life possible.

The experiment in Bruges was broadly consistent with the spiritual practices of diverse Anabaptist communities across Europe in the sixteenth century. What hopes compelled them to make these choices? As part of an apocalyptically saturated late mediaeval world, believers’ baptism in Bruges and elsewhere was the sign that would save in the Day of Judgment (note 10). Mennonite theologian Thomas Finger captures the importance of this expectation: “If Jesus has already conquered the powers of evil and if he will surely return to consummate all of God’s plans, then no situation of evil, tragedy, or despair can be as threatening as it looks. It must pass away” (note 11). Premised on the presence of the risen Christ through God’s Spirit, “they held to the conviction that the process of attaining salvation would involve a painful process of renouncing self and following after Jesus Christ into the suffering and the cross” (note 12).

How one could or should "walk" if this is the case was never obvious. But a tradition developed roughly around that question as well as a community of practice that adapted, experimented, and at times even reinvented itself beyond recognition.

This short vignette recalls some of the beginnings that are critical for understanding the decisions and conflicts that shaped the longer Russian Mennonite journey (note 13).

                        --Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: On the origins, see C. Arnold Snyder, Anabaptist History and Theology: An Introduction (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 1995).

Note 2: Code of Justinian, Bk. I, title VI.2 (To Avoid the Repetition of Baptism), The Emperors Honorius and Theodosius to Anthemius, Praetorian Prefect, AD 413, in Samuel P. Scott, ed., The Civil Law, vol. 12 (Cincinnati, OH: Central Trust, 1932), XII, 72, https://constitution.org/2-Authors/sps/sps.htm.

Note 3: A. C. de Schrevel, ed., Histoire Séminaire de Bruges, vol. 1 (Bruges: de Planke, 1895), 690, 691, n.2. https://books.google.ca/books?id=sms0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA691#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 4: Cf. Walter Klaassen, Living at the End of the Ages. Apocalyptic Expectation in the Radical Reformation (New York: University of America Press, 1992), 45-51.

Note 5: Menno Simons, “Reply to Gellius Faber,” in The Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 670. For Menno's writings online, see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html.

Note 6: Anna Oldenburg-Delmenhorst, “On the Treatment of Sectarians,” February 15, 1545, in A. F. Mellink, ed., Documenta Anabaptistica Nederlandica. Part I: Friesland en Groningen (1530–1550) (Leiden: Brill, 1975), 190.

Note 7: Cf. the unique use of the term in article one of the early Swiss and South German “Schleitheim Confession (1527),” in Howard John Loewen, One Lord, One Church, One Hope, One God: Mennonite Confessions of Faith, Text-Reader Series 2 (Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies, 1985), 79-84, https://archive.org/details/onelordonechurch02loew/.

Note 8: Simons, “Foundation,” Complete Writings, 122 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 9: Simons, “The Spiritual Resurrection,” Complete Writings, 5162 (see http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html).

Note 10: Cf. Sjouke Voolstra, “True Penitence: The Core of Menno Simons’ Theology,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 387–400.

Note 11: Thomas Finger, Christian Theology: An Eschatological Approach, vol. 1 (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1985), 102, https://archive.org/details/christiantheolog0000fing.

Note 12: Snyder, Following in the Footsteps of Christ, 48. On the defining significance of “long-suffering” (lijdtsaemheyt) in the writings of Jacob de Roore and Flemish Anabaptists generally, cf. Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988), 326f.

Note 13: There are many very good sources that rehearse the well-researched anbd broader beginnings of the Anabaptism in the Low Countries. I offer a few posts here related to the city of Bruges to give that larger story a local profile.


Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Soviet “Farmer Giesbrecht” and the German Communist Press, 1930

The 1930 booklet  Bauer Giesbrecht was published by the Communist Party press in Germany —some months after most of the 3,885 Mennonite refugees at Moscow had been transported from Germany to Canada, Paraguay and Brazil ( note 1 ). In Fall 1929 Germany set aside an astonishingly large sum of money and flexed its full diplomatic muscle to extract these “German Farmers” (mostly Mennonites) who had fled the Soviet countryside for Moscow in a last ditch attempt to flee the "Soviet Paradise". About 9,000 however were forcibly turned back. Communists in Germany saw their country’s aid operation—which their crushed economy could ill afford—as a blatant propaganda attempt to embarrass Stalin with formerly wealthy ethnic German farmers and preachers willing to tell the world’s press the worst "lies." With Heinrich Kornelius Giesbrecht from the former Mennonite Barnaul Colony in Western Siberia they finally had a poster-boy to make their point: in Germany he had seen an...

Swiss and Palatinate Connections

Sometime after 1850 Andreas Plennert and his family immigrated to South Russia from the Culm Region of West Prussia. Though there was at least one Mennonite “Plehnert” who had already immigrated to Russia in 1793, it is not a very common Prussian-Russian Mennonite name. As such, however, it is easier to trace than many and offers a minority narrative and identity within the longer and broader Russian Mennonite story. The account below is adapted largely from information in Horst Penner, Die ost- und westpreußischen Mennoniten , vol. 1, though I have expanded upon his work to offer a slightly different narrative. In 1724 there was a group of Mennonites forced out of the Memel region in East Prussia for political and religious reasons and were given assistance to resettle back to West Prussia in areas populated by Mennonites. Among the 23 households that went to the Stuhm region there is one Plenert listed, namely Christian Plenert. We know that Mennonites entered the Memel region ...

Snapshots of Danzig Mennonites, late 1600s & early 1700s

A picture can be worth a thousand words. We do not have photographs, but we have a few colour paintings of life in and around Danzig in the late 1600s and early 1700s, as well as maps. We also have a limited number of "textual snapshots" of Mennonites at this time and place, which offer an instructive window into that foreign world. These snapshots of work, worship, health, education, community relationships, smaller repressions, and security can contribute to the creation of a larger collage of Mennonite life in Danzig and Polish Prussia.  Snapshot 1 : In 1681 there were approximately 180 Mennonite families who lived in the “gardens” or villages outside Danzig, with 113 of those families within the jurisdiction of the city. At this time Mennonites were barred from owning houses within the walls of the city. Of these 113 family heads, we know: 43 were retailers of spirits, 24 merchants, 9 lacemakers, 7 dyers, 3 silk dyers, 3 pressers, 2 brokers, 2 treasurers, 2 waitresses, et...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 1 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accuarte and carefully considered. ~ANF American Mennonite leaders who supported Trump will be responding to the election results in the near future. Sometimes a template or sample conference address helps to formulate one’s own text. To that end I offer the following. When Hitler came to power in 1933, Mennonites in Germany sent official greetings by telegram: “The Conference of the East and West Prussian Mennonites meeting today at Tiegenhagen in the Free City of Danzig are deeply grateful for the tremendous uprising ( Erhebung ) that God has given our people ( Volk ) through the vigor and action of [unclear], and promise our cooperation in the construction of our Fatherland, true to the Gospel motto of [our founder Menno Simons], ‘For no one can lay any foundation other than the one already laid, which is Jesus Christ.’” ( Note 1 ) Hitler responded in a letter...

Easter and Molotschna's First Ethnic German Cavalry Regiment of the Waffen-SS, 1942

For the two years of German occupation, 1941-43, the Molotschna Settlement area—renamed “Halbstadt” after its largest village—was under S.S. ( Schutzstaffel ) control. During this time, new National Socialist ceremonies and liturgies were introduced to the Mennonites in Ukraine, including Easter. Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler named Halbstadt with its surrounding 144 villages a district commando. SS-Storm Unit Leader ( Sturmbannführer ) Hermann Roßner was appointed the Special Command R[ussia] leader for Halbstadt. Halbstadt had Waffen-SS doctors, a Waffen-SS pharmacist team and pharmacy, hospital equipment from the medical offices of the Waffen-SS and soon a Waffen-SS cavalry self-defense regiment of some 500-plus Mennonite young men ( note 1 ). Two of my uncles became members of the cavalry unit; a later, long-time lay minister in my home congregation was in the regiment as well. SS-celebrations for “Easter” were deliberately non-religious and anti-Christian, though careful ...

Molotschna's 50th Anniversary Celebration Plans, 1854

There is no mention of this celebrative event in Hildebrand’s Chronologischer Zeittafel, no report in the newly launched Prussian church paper Mennonitische Blätter , or in the Unterhaltungsblatt for German colonists in South Russia. But plans to celebrate five decades of Mennonite settlement on the Molotschna River were well underway in 1853; detailed draft notes for the event are found in the Peter J. Braun Russian Mennonite Archive ( note 1 ). Perhaps most importantly the file includes the list of names of the first settlers in each of the first nine Molotschna villages (est. 1804). While each village had been mandated a few years earlier to write its own village history ( note 2; pics ), eight of these nine did not list their first settler families by name. The lists with the male family heads are attached below. By 1854 Molotoschna’s population had increased to about 17,000; more than half of those living in the original nine villages were landless Anwohner ( note 3 ). Celeb...

Landless Crisis: Molotschna, 1840s to 1860s

The landless crisis in the mid-1800s in the Molotschna Colony is the context for most other matters of importance to its Mennonites, 1840s to 1860s. When discussing landlessness, historian David G. Rempel has claimed that the “seemingly endemic wranglings and splits” of the Mennonite church in South Russia were only seldom or superficially related to doctrine, and “almost invariably and intimately bound up with some of the most serious social and economic issues” that afflicted one or more of the congregations in the settlement ( note 1 ). It is important from the start to recognize that these Mennonites were not citizens,  but foreign colonists with obligations and privileges that governed their sojourn in New Russia. For Mennonites the privileges, e.g. of land and freedom from military conscription, were connected to the obligation of model farming. Mennonites were given one, and then later two districts of land for this purpose. Within their districts or colonies , villages w...