Flight from Flanders to Friesland

In the latter half of the sixteenth century Protestantism gradually spread throughout the northern Netherlands in the form of Calvinism—which had a direct impact on Anabaptists.

When the Northern Provinces of the Netherlands led by the exiled Protestant Prince William of Orange went to war against Spain in 1568, persecution of Anabaptists in Catholic Flanders increased again. Long before the Protestant Northern Provinces would declare independence in 1581, the inquisition against Anabaptists in Bruges, for example, had achieved its goal. With the last two Anabaptist executions in the city in 1573, the once large and thriving Mennonite congregation was extinguished. Subsequently Mennonites lived in Bruges only on rare occasions, and when present, for only a short time, as for example the well-known art historian Karel van Mander in 1582 (note 1).

In the Northern Provinces Calvinism had become attractive theologically and politically. Not only was Christian resistance to tyrannical governments permitted in the new Reformed movement, but followers of Calvin considered it a positive Christian responsibility to overthrow a godless regime, which they saw embodied in Philip II of Spain (who continued to rule over Flanders).

Mennonites continued to renounce in principle the use of force for achieving the Christendom goals of Christian teaching or mission, challenging the formal or informal connection between state and church.

However, the declaration of independence by the seven northern provinces and the elevation of Calvinism as state religion brought a welcome measure of religious tolerance for Mennonites, though not recognition. Many Anabaptists from the southern Catholic Low Countries fled for the provinces of Holland, Zeeland and in particular, Friesland—all regions with significant Anabaptist presence (note 2).

The population transfer within the Netherlands from south to north during these years was massive; the hemorrhaging reached its peak between 1585 and 1587, and “amounted to over 100,000 refugees and, possibly, as many as 150,000,” with Bruges losing “about half of its inhabitants” (note 3). Some of the Dutch towns and cities to which the Flemish Protestant and Anabaptist refugees arrived grew spectacularly—even doubling and tripling in size.

Then as now, success in refugee resettlement is determined in part on the capacities of a society to absorb a massive influx on the one hand, and for newcomers to adapt their skills, on the other.

"What is most remarkable about the exodus to the north after 1585 is the speed and comparative ease with which the newcomers were integrated into Dutch society and economic life. … [T]he new labour force hardly anywhere overlapped, or competed, with the existing Dutch proletariat. The United Provinces at the end of the sixteenth century, was a land of two proletariats—the native and the immigrant—which performed largely separate tasks." (Note 4)

It is not surprising that the many urban Flemish Anabaptist silk- and linen-weavers would be sufficiently different culturally from their rural agrarian Frisian Mennonite co-religionists and hosts, and that differences in faith and practice might arise as well.

The Frisians took offense at the elaborate “worldly” dress and manners of the more urban Flemish, whereas the Flemish felt they had more than proven their world-denying faith in persecution and migration.

The Flemish in turn thought the Frisians were not sufficiently sober and simple with regard to their homes and household furnishings. Coming from a background of more severe persecution, the Flemish were also more rigorous with community discipline than Frisians.

The former held consistently to those parts of Menno’s theology that taught that Jesus did not take on fallen human nature, but came clothed in untarnished “celestial flesh” (note 5); as a consequence, the church as Bride of Christ is not only “without spot or wrinkle” because of God’s grace, but can and should also remain so. The earthly Jesus became the model the church was to imitate to enter the Kingdom of God. To keep the church “pure,” church discipline was necessary, which included the ban and the related shunning of banned members—a view which had been central in Bruges, for example (note 6).

This understandably led to tensions and a major schism later in Friesland. The Flemish vision of church was supported by Menno’s more legalistic co-elder Dirk Philips (a Frisian), which demanded a strict application of the ban and shunning in daily life (note 7).

Factions developed, and the names “Flemish” and “Frisian” soon became less geographic names of origin than names of parties of like-minded Mennonites—though few from Flanders ever joined with what became “Frisian” congregations. The differences were significant as early as 1567 when the Flemish pronounced a ban on all Frisian Mennonites.

This Flemish/Frisian difference would play a defining role for descendants for the next three hundred years in their countries of refuge and settlement—including Russia. Notably, however, while the application of the ban was harsh and in retrospect more destructive than constructive for the community, it was restrained compared to the dominant groups in their context, who could still pursue their heretics as agents of the devil with the most brutal punishments and execution.

--Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: David Kunzle, From Criminal to Courtier: The Soldier in Netherlandish Art 1550–1672 (Leiden: Brill, 2002), 237.

Note 2: Cf. Blaupot ten Cate, in Benjamin H. Unruh, Die niederländisch-niederdeutschen Hintergründe der mennonitischen Ostwanderungen im 16., 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (Karlsruhe: Self-published, 1955), 46, 48.

Note 3: Jonathan Israel, The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall, 1477–1806 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995), 308.

Note 4: Israel, The Dutch Republic, 309f. Cf. also Cornelius Krahn, Dutch Anabaptism: Origin, Spread, Life and Thought (1450–1600) (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968), 211-214.

Note 5: Cf. Herman Vlekwijk, in Thieleman J. Van Braght, The Martyrs’ Mirror: The Story of Fifteen Centuries of Martyrdom (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 2001), 795f., https://archive.org/details/TheBloodyTheaterOrMartyrsMirrorOfTheDefenselessChristians. This doctrine was still referred to in at least one confession in use in the nineteenth century in Russia. The article “Of the Incarnation of the Son of God” in an Old Flemish confession used by the Kleine Gemeinde in 1844 confesses: “Upon reflection it is evident that he was not of the flesh and blood of his mother. John says, the Word was made flesh.” In Delbert Plett, Storm and Triumph. The Mennonite Kleine Gemeinde (1850–1875) (Steinbach, MB: D. F. P. Publications, 1986), 78, https://www.mharchives.ca/download/1575/.

Note 6: Cf. van Braght, Martyrs Mirror, 807f.

Note 7: Cf. Menno Simons’ 1541 booklet, “A Kind Admonition on Church Discipline” in The Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984), 407–418; cf. also 1043–145; 1050–1051 (http://www.mennosimons.net/writings.html). Dirk Philips was severe in his understanding of the ban and avoidance; cf. The Writings of Dirk Philips, 1504–1568, translated and edited by Cornelius J. Dyck et al. (Waterloo, ON: Herald, 1992), Kindle edition, A.11; C.4–6. See also chapters in his Enchiridon/ Handbook, 519ff., https://archive.org/details/enchiridionorhan00phil/page/538/mode/2up.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog