Bruges - Flemish Mennonite/ Anabaptist Reformation

The Russian Mennonite beginnings stretch back to the Reformation in the sixteenth century in the Low Countries, including Flanders and the beautiful and historic city of Bruges.

Many regularly appearing Russian Mennonites names are represented in the Anabaptist group in Bruges, for example, and can also be used as a window onto the larger story.

In a 1576 report on Bruges, Monk Alfonso of St. Emilian wrote to Philip II--the "most Catholic" of Emperors--that the “city is completely infected by said heretical pest more than any other city of the region. … it is a refuge and a storehouse of all heretics and miscreants. Of a thousand homes in that city, not one is pure" (note 1).

Most famously, a "Group of 12" Anabaptists were martyred in Bruges in 1561 (note 2; pic). A hymn was written to remember these “twelve friends killed in Bruges”; the entire story is sung in twelve verses and each martyr is individually named (note 3; pic 3). The hymn entitled “Grace and Peace must be Godly” is found in a Flemish Mennonite hymnal first published in the 16th century—predating the Martyrs Mirror. It was reprinted frequently and in use as late as 1750. The unnamed hymn writer offers the verses as an “example” to inspire faithfulness to God’s Word and joy in suffering

The first Anabaptist executions in Bruges occurred as early as 1538, and these continued with sporadic intensity for the next thirty-five years until all had fled, recanted or were killed.

Almost all of the Bruges Anabaptists had already fled from harsher repression in the cities of Antwerp and Ghent or the south Flemish Kortrijk region (note 4). In Bruges they could be hired for their labour and skills, and also connect discreetly with like-minded believers eager to read the Bible and explore together what obedience of faith might require of them.

Amongst those executed in Bruges (note 5) beyond the twelve were a thirty-seven year old candlemaker and weaver, Jacob de Roore (note 6); two tailors and businessmen Herman Vlekwijk and Mattheus Keuse; a linen weaver; two silk weavers including Maillaert de Grave noted above, who later recanted but was still executed; a sheep shearer and hatter; a basket maker; a miller; a rope maker Jan Diericxsone, who was “graciously” beheaded and had likely recanted; a wood-cutter and local Bruges citizen; a shepherd; an author of various anti-Catholic writings; an actor and rhetorician, Jan Verveste, or Jan Van der Veste (note 7).

One of the Anabaptist weavers put to death in Bruges, Jacob de Swarte, had eighteen family members executed in Flanders between 1558 and 1567.

The first Anabaptists martyred in Bruges were exclusively women—seven were executed over an eleven day period in August 1538. Josyne Schricx was burnt alive without being first strangulated, which was customary for women (considered more merciful). Marguerite Inghels and Magdalena de Vos recanted but were then buried alive, which was considered to be the worst form of execution. Livine Verwee perished giving birth in prison.

In 1568, fourteen Anabaptists were meeting in Bruges and found by police; of the five who did not recant, four were women: Lauwereinse Huutgheers, Maycken’s Heeren; Jacquemijne de Wilde, Cathalijne Loury.

Some younger Anabaptists were tricked with “cunning” interrogations and recanted, like the eighteen-year-old Callekin, daughter of preacher Pauwels Vermaete. Hans, the fifteen-year-old son of Jan Verveste, escaped the Bruges prison with his accomplice Cornelis Jansins after they cut through the iron bars, made a rope from bed-sheets and lowered themselves to the street below. Hans’ eighteen year-old brother Lievin, a textile maker, was released.

One source reported that between the end of October and the beginning of November 1572, 140 heretics were executed in Bruges (note 8; see pic 1). The last Mennonite martyr of Bruges was a twenty-one-year-old hatter, Adriaen de Hoedemaker, who died in 1573.

While the Anabaptist beginnings in Bruges were tragically short-lived, the Bruges martyrology and confessions have not only contributed to a cherished Anabaptist heritage, but helped to establish the principle of religious tolerance in places like The Netherlands (note 9).

This longer narrative description of the Anabaptist community in Bruges is one starting point for understanding the Mennonites of Prussia and Russia. The movement in Flanders was not led by the educated elite or magisterium, whether Prince or Pope, nor was it contingent on one elder. Rather, it was lay-led by inventive artisans who were discovering a conscious Christian identity for the first time and who dared push back the constraints of inherited orthodoxy.

-Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

--Notes--

Note 1: Cited in A. L. E. Verheyden, Anabaptism in Flanders (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1961), 80, https://archive.org/details/anabaptisminflan0000verh. See also A. C. de Schrevel, Histoire Séminaire de Bruges, vol. 1 (Bruges: de Planke, 1895), 691f., https://books.google.ca/books?id=sms0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA691#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 2: Thieleman J. Van Braght, The Martyrs’ Mirror: The Story of Fifteen Centuries of Martyrdom (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 2001), 655f. https://archive.org/details/TheBloodyTheaterOrMartyrsMirrorOfTheDefenselessChristians/page/n653.

Note 3: Philipp Wackernagel, Lieder der niederländischen Reformierten aus der Zeit der Verfolgung im 16. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt, 1867), 130, https://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10591883_00156.html.

Note 4: Cf. Verheyden, Anabaptism in Flanders, 51f.

Note 5: Names from A. L. E. Verheyden, "Het Brugse Martyrologium (1527–1573)," (Brussel: Wilco, 1944), http://www.theologienet.nl/documenten/Verheyden%20Brugse%20Martyrologium.pdf. See also: Ludo Vandamme, “Doopsgezinden in Brugge, 1555–1575,” Doopsgezinde Bijdragen, nieuwe reeks, no. 24 (1998) 9–24, http://www.dhkonline.nl/publicaties/db_nr/nr_24_1998/009a_aa_024-24_1998/.

Note 6: Cf. Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988) 318–331.

Note 7: The children of Jan Verweste (Van der Veste) were later freed. Only twenty-four years later (1582) an Arendt Veste was amongst the first Flemish Anabaptists to appear in the Danzig region, where he had signed a petition by Werder Mennonites to the Council of the City of Danzig (G. Reimer, “Fast [Feste, Faast, Vast] family,” Mennonite Encyclopedia/ GAMEO: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Fast_(Feste,_Faast,_Vast)_family).

Note 8: Verheyden, "Het Brugse Martyrologium (1527–1573)," 61.

Note 9: Cf. Gary Waite, “A Reappraisal of the Contribution of Anabaptists to the Religious Culture and Intellectual Climate of the Dutch Republic,” in Religious Minorities and Cultural Diversity in the Dutch Republic, edited by August den Hollander, et al., 6–28 (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2019), 7, 27.

Pic 1: Burning of Anton Ijsbaerts, Flanders 1573; from the Martyrs Mirror.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog