Bruges - Flemish Mennonite/ Anabaptist Reformation

The Russian Mennonite beginnings stretch back to the Reformation in the sixteenth century in the Low Countries, including Flanders and the beautiful and historic city of Bruges.

Many regularly appearing Russian Mennonites names are represented in the Anabaptist group in Bruges, for example, and can also be used as a window onto the larger story.

In a 1576 report on Bruges, Monk Alfonso of St. Emilian wrote to Philip II--the "most Catholic" of Emperors--that the “city is completely infected by said heretical pest more than any other city of the region. … it is a refuge and a storehouse of all heretics and miscreants. Of a thousand homes in that city, not one is pure" (note 1).

Most famously, a "Group of 12" Anabaptists were martyred in Bruges in 1561 (note 2; pic). A hymn was written to remember these “twelve friends killed in Bruges”; the entire story is sung in twelve verses and each martyr is individually named (note 3; pic 3). The hymn entitled “Grace and Peace must be Godly” is found in a Flemish Mennonite hymnal first published in the 16th century—predating the Martyrs Mirror. It was reprinted frequently and in use as late as 1750. The unnamed hymn writer offers the verses as an “example” to inspire faithfulness to God’s Word and joy in suffering

The first Anabaptist executions in Bruges occurred as early as 1538, and these continued with sporadic intensity for the next thirty-five years until all had fled, recanted or were killed.

Almost all of the Bruges Anabaptists had already fled from harsher repression in the cities of Antwerp and Ghent or the south Flemish Kortrijk region (note 4). In Bruges they could be hired for their labour and skills, and also connect discreetly with like-minded believers eager to read the Bible and explore together what obedience of faith might require of them.

Amongst those executed in Bruges (note 5) beyond the twelve were a thirty-seven year old candlemaker and weaver, Jacob de Roore (note 6); two tailors and businessmen Herman Vlekwijk and Mattheus Keuse; a linen weaver; two silk weavers including Maillaert de Grave noted above, who later recanted but was still executed; a sheep shearer and hatter; a basket maker; a miller; a rope maker Jan Diericxsone, who was “graciously” beheaded and had likely recanted; a wood-cutter and local Bruges citizen; a shepherd; an author of various anti-Catholic writings; an actor and rhetorician, Jan Verveste, or Jan Van der Veste (note 7).

One of the Anabaptist weavers put to death in Bruges, Jacob de Swarte, had eighteen family members executed in Flanders between 1558 and 1567.

The first Anabaptists martyred in Bruges were exclusively women—seven were executed over an eleven day period in August 1538. Josyne Schricx was burnt alive without being first strangulated, which was customary for women (considered more merciful). Marguerite Inghels and Magdalena de Vos recanted but were then buried alive, which was considered to be the worst form of execution. Livine Verwee perished giving birth in prison.

In 1568, fourteen Anabaptists were meeting in Bruges and found by police; of the five who did not recant, four were women: Lauwereinse Huutgheers, Maycken’s Heeren; Jacquemijne de Wilde, Cathalijne Loury.

Some younger Anabaptists were tricked with “cunning” interrogations and recanted, like the eighteen-year-old Callekin, daughter of preacher Pauwels Vermaete. Hans, the fifteen-year-old son of Jan Verveste, escaped the Bruges prison with his accomplice Cornelis Jansins after they cut through the iron bars, made a rope from bed-sheets and lowered themselves to the street below. Hans’ eighteen year-old brother Lievin, a textile maker, was released.

One source reported that between the end of October and the beginning of November 1572, 140 heretics were executed in Bruges (note 8; see pic 1). The last Mennonite martyr of Bruges was a twenty-one-year-old hatter, Adriaen de Hoedemaker, who died in 1573.

While the Anabaptist beginnings in Bruges were tragically short-lived, the Bruges martyrology and confessions have not only contributed to a cherished Anabaptist heritage, but helped to establish the principle of religious tolerance in places like The Netherlands (note 9).

This longer narrative description of the Anabaptist community in Bruges is one starting point for understanding the Mennonites of Prussia and Russia. The movement in Flanders was not led by the educated elite or magisterium, whether Prince or Pope, nor was it contingent on one elder. Rather, it was lay-led by inventive artisans who were discovering a conscious Christian identity for the first time and who dared push back the constraints of inherited orthodoxy.

-Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

--Notes--

Note 1: Cited in A. L. E. Verheyden, Anabaptism in Flanders (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1961), 80, https://archive.org/details/anabaptisminflan0000verh. See also A. C. de Schrevel, Histoire Séminaire de Bruges, vol. 1 (Bruges: de Planke, 1895), 691f., https://books.google.ca/books?id=sms0AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA691#v=onepage&q&f=false.

Note 2: Thieleman J. Van Braght, The Martyrs’ Mirror: The Story of Fifteen Centuries of Martyrdom (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 2001), 655f. https://archive.org/details/TheBloodyTheaterOrMartyrsMirrorOfTheDefenselessChristians/page/n653.

Note 3: Philipp Wackernagel, Lieder der niederländischen Reformierten aus der Zeit der Verfolgung im 16. Jahrhundert (Frankfurt, 1867), 130, https://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10591883_00156.html.

Note 4: Cf. Verheyden, Anabaptism in Flanders, 51f.

Note 5: Names from A. L. E. Verheyden, "Het Brugse Martyrologium (1527–1573)," (Brussel: Wilco, 1944), http://www.theologienet.nl/documenten/Verheyden%20Brugse%20Martyrologium.pdf. See also: Ludo Vandamme, “Doopsgezinden in Brugge, 1555–1575,” Doopsgezinde Bijdragen, nieuwe reeks, no. 24 (1998) 9–24, http://www.dhkonline.nl/publicaties/db_nr/nr_24_1998/009a_aa_024-24_1998/.

Note 6: Cf. Martha J. Reimer-Blok, “The Theological Identity of Flemish Anabaptists: A Study of the Letters of Jacob de Roore,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 62, no. 3 (July 1988) 318–331.

Note 7: The children of Jan Verweste (Van der Veste) were later freed. Only twenty-four years later (1582) an Arendt Veste was amongst the first Flemish Anabaptists to appear in the Danzig region, where he had signed a petition by Werder Mennonites to the Council of the City of Danzig (G. Reimer, “Fast [Feste, Faast, Vast] family,” Mennonite Encyclopedia/ GAMEO: https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Fast_(Feste,_Faast,_Vast)_family).

Note 8: Verheyden, "Het Brugse Martyrologium (1527–1573)," 61.

Note 9: Cf. Gary Waite, “A Reappraisal of the Contribution of Anabaptists to the Religious Culture and Intellectual Climate of the Dutch Republic,” in Religious Minorities and Cultural Diversity in the Dutch Republic, edited by August den Hollander, et al., 6–28 (Leiden/Boston: Brill, 2019), 7, 27.

Pic 1: Burning of Anton Ijsbaerts, Flanders 1573; from the Martyrs Mirror.

Comments

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia: “We cordially plead ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog