Christmas and New Year’s Letter to the New King, 1797

On Christmas Eve Day 1797, Orlofferfelde Elder Heinrich Donner took time to write the new 28-year-old monarch, Friedrich Wilhelm III, King of Prussia, on behalf of the entire Mennonite West Prussian ministerial:

“We, your humble servants, prostrate ourselves in deep reverence before your Honourable Royal Majesty at this year end, to offer our most loving congratulations on the occasion of our Honourable Royal Majesty’s ascendence to the supreme throne. No wishes are more heartfelt and fervent than ours, because our entire well-being is dependent on the great happiness brought about by being subject to the glorious and wise scepter of your Honourable Royal Majesty. Therefore, we wish for our Honourable Royal Majesty perpetual happiness, to the highest of all your government: May God grant His Royal Majesty, as well as your dearest wife, Her Majesty the Queen, the pleasures of all desired wealth and rewards and also infinite years for the welfare of the whole country. Then our joyous hope will be satisfied in receiving grace and protection from our Honourable Royal Majesty, the wisest monarch, in regards to our religion and our sustenance in favourable measure, and may we enjoy them forever. We pledge our Honourable Royal Majesty all the loyalty and servility your righteous subjects are capable of, and eagerly look forward to the time, Honourable Royal Majesty, just as our immortalized ancestors, to give the highest of all our solemn promise of homage publicly and deepest reverence.

Honourable Royal Majesty, your humble servants, the Elders and Ministers of all the Mennonite congregations in West Prussia: Heinrich Donner [Orlofferfelde; Frisian], Dirk Thiessen [Tiegenhagen; Flemish], Cornelius Warkentin [Rosenort; Flemish].” (Note 1)

The response reads as follows:

"His Royal Majesty, our most gracious ruler, acknowledges with gracious pleasure the congratulations and good wishes, which the Elders and Ministers of all the Mennonite congregations in West Prussia wish to express on the 24th of December at the approaching New Year, and does not fail to thank them for this with the assurance of his highest paternal grace.” Frederick Wilhelm Berlin December 31, 1797." (Translation slightly altered)

Since 1772, “full parity” between Catholics and Lutherans was established in the Marienwerder, whereas Mennonites were only to be “tolerated” and “the numerous beggar Jews (Betteljuden)” were designated for “gradual removal” (note 2).

Donner, Warkentin and Thiessen were politically astute Mennonite leaders for these very uncertain times. Notably five years later, hundreds of Mennonite families would leave Prussia to form the new Molotschna Colony in Russia.

Already under the new king’s father, Friedrich-Wilhelm II, the view from Berlin had turned toxic towards the “slothful and useless” Mennonites, and the benefits of expulsion were seriously weighed (note 3).

This came to a head with the Mennonite Edict of 1789, which made it almost impossible for Mennonites to increase their land holdings in number or size:

“We wish, therefore, to order and command [that Mennonites]:

… shall no longer be able to easily acquire the most comfortable and productive properties out from other subjects who serve in the military;

… shall be required to pay the same fees proportional to the value of their properties as Protestant members toward the support of Protestant church buildings, parsonages with chapels, and parsonages, as well as teacher residences and school buildings;

… shall … be required to pay the same church fees for births, weddings, and funerals where they are required of Protestants … [as well as] the supplemental pastoral fees in kind;

… concerning the children of mixed marriages … they shall be raised in the faith of their non-Mennonite parent.” (Note 4)

If their “religious opinion” kept Mennonites from “fulfilling one of the pre-eminent duties of loyal subjects—the defence of the fatherland”—it followed that they “may not have all those civil privileges enjoyed by subjects who willingly undertake this duty” and who are “more useful to the state,” according to Friedrich-Wilhelm II (note 5).

The land restrictions and new fees meant impoverishment for many, and no prospects for the poor and their children. The vast majority of Mennonites in Prussia still hoped that they would be able to negotiate a fair resolution as they had done so often in the past. After all, the Prussian state exempted the whole upper stratum of society from military service, including artisans and workers in industries. Elder Donner was convinced that the best political strategy was--as in the past--not to boast of their virtues, achievements, and economic contributions before the king, but simply plead for his grace. Like God, a sovereign king tolerates his subjects not on their merits, but because of grace alone (note 6). This assumption and tactic was behind the Christmas/New Years letter to the new king as well (this approach would change some years later on the advise of a leading lawyer; note 7).

In 1793 Donner and Warkentin met with the Governor of Prussia who restated that he would strongly oppose any Mennonite petitions. Donner informed the Governor that as a consequence many more Mennonite families would want to emigrate. “Let them go,” was the Governor’s response. But when asked if he would approve applications for emigration, he said no (note 8).

A year and a half after the Christmas letter above, on June 30, 1799, in a response to an unwisely formulated letter by a lone minister, the King reaffirmed his father’s 1789 policy that linked any Mennonite land acquisition to military service. The normally calm Frisian Elder Heinrich Donner was livid in his response: “Under Prussian rule we have never received such a disgraceful resolution as this. … [It] even seeks to prove that the station of a soldier is a duty based on the teachings of Jesus, and that we should unite this duty with our religious principles. … Lord have mercy!” It now seemed to Donner that they were like the people of Israel when a new king came to power in Egypt, “according to the description in Exodus 1:8–13,” who was ignorant of their legacy and call, and enslaved and oppressed them (note 9).

---Arnold Neufeld-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Heinrich Donner Diary (Tagebuch) (1774-1803), translated by Elfriede Rempel and Glenn Penner, Mennonite Heritage Archives Winnipeg, Feb 2023, https://www.mharchives.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Heinrich-Donner-Diary-12-Feb-2023.pdf. Translation slightly altered. German: Orlofferfelde Chronik, transcribed by Werner Janzen and Merle Schlabough, 2022, Mennonite Library and Archives-Bethel College, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/cong_303/ok63/orlofferfeldechronik.html.

Note 2: Prussian policy did not change. Cf. Hans Maercker, “Geschichte des Schwetzer Kreises 1466–1873,” Zeitschrift der Westpreussischen Geschichtsvereins 17 [1886], 67, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/52346/edition/49705#structure. Cf. also “Obermedizinalrat” and “Bericht der westpreussischen Kammer, 1803,” cited in Karge, “Die Auswanderung,” 70, 74f. It was argued that the state “would gain more than it would lose with the emigration” of this “soft” and “lazy type of humanity.” Conscription should be expanded to include every Mennonite, and such a policy could only be bettered, in the view of one regional official, if the same policies were enforced against “that similar type of humanity to the Mennonites in this province, namely the Jews.”

Note 3: Paul Karge, “Die Auswanderung ost- und westpreussischen Mennoniten nach Südrussland (nach Chortiza und der Molotschna), 1787–1820,” Elbinger Jahrbuch 3 (1923), 70, http://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=13874; https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/0v760.pdf.

Note 4: Frederick William II, King of Prussia, “Edict Concerning the Future Establishment of the Mennonites in All Royal Provinces Excluding the Duchy Silesia, 1789,” in Mark Jantzen, Mennonite German Soldiers: Nation, Religion, and Family in the Prussian East, 1772–1880, translated by Mark Jantzen, Appendix, Document 2, 256–260 (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2010). Original: “Edict, die künftige Einrichtung des Mennonisten-Wesens in sämmtlichen Königlichen Provinzien exklusive des Herzogthums Schlesien betreffend,” Berlin, July 30, 1789. Decker, 1789. From Staatsbibliothek Berlin, https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN806951052.

Note 5: In Jantzen, Mennonite German Soldiers, 256; cf. also the "1801 Declaration," ibid., 262.

Note 6: Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik [German], 57 (1799).

Note 7: Eventually Mennonites retained an influential and well-connected lawyer from Königsberg. Rather than references to scripture or old Polish Privilegia, his strategy was to highlight the huge loss of technical knowledge and vast human resources in industry and agriculture because of the state’s policy. Cf. Karge, “Die Auswanderung,” 73.

Note 8: Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, 44f.; 47.

Note 9: Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, 57.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Christmas and New Year's Letter to the New King, 1797,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), December 24, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/12/christmas-and-new-years-letter-to-new.html.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog