Skip to main content

Flooding and Mennonites: A Common Thread

In November 2021 many Mennonites in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia were impacted by disastrous flooding. The mayor of Abbotsford—the worst-hit city—as well as the local Member of Parliament were Mennonites. Many Mennonites across Canada had family members who are directly impacted. 

Flood stories have been an important thread in the Prussian-Russian Mennonite story. How have Mennonites responded? Mutual aid stands out. For Menno Simons, it was “the only sign whereby a true Christian may be known” (note 1). 

In 1562, “Dutch people of the Mennonite religion” were specifically invited by the Polish banking house Loysen to settle on the “Tiegenhoff part of the Vistula Delta” to rebuild dikes partially destroyed by huge floods (1540 and 1543) and wars, and to drain low-lying lagoons and swamps over large blocks of land (note 2). The Tiege River—a branch of the Vistula—was at or below sea level. 

Dams and ditches along the Nogat and Vistula rivers had been constructed for at least three centuries before Mennonites arrived, and the waters consistently had free run over the entire flood plain and its sparse population. Where lands had been won from “swamp” and sea after some years of labour, the rivers regularly and massively pushed back and spilled their banks (note 3). 

From The Netherlands Mennonites brought skills to construct unique windmills that continuously pumped out water from the lowest points, and they designed and built complex systems of canals and sub-canals to discharge the water. The land had to be dried, cleared and strategically sloped to control water run-off and to protect from flooding. 

Because of the enormous labour required, with little capital for construction, and the danger of swamp fever, up to eighty percent of the first settlers died prematurely. In some places it took a century—three generations—to create a stable or fruitful agricultural region and, of necessity, a sense of community (note 4). The conditions helped to birth significant Mennonite-Christian social experiments of mutual aid. 

Mennonite newcomers from Holland normally became members of a Mennonite drainage company and village leasing association with common obligations to maintain the dams. Long-term leases valid for thirty to forty years encouraged the development of the land (note 5).

When a dike in the Vistula Delta broke and caused severe flooding in 1622, two “Dutchmen”—Andreas Bril and Hendrik Penner—appeared before the Polish King on behalf of the residents of Tiege to inquire regarding obligations for maintenance on the main dike (note 6). 

In 1642 the first Mennonite Privilegium was issued, which guaranteed broad privileges and which recognized the Mennonite economic contribution to the kingdom—especially with respect to flooding and the creation of dams: 

"We are all well aware of the manner in which the ancestors of the Mennonite inhabitants of the Marienburg islands (Werder), both large and small, were invited here with the knowledge and by the will of the gracious King Sigismund Augustus, to areas that were barren, swampy and unusable places in those islands. With great effort and at very high cost, they made these lands fertile and productive. They cleared out the brush, and, in order to drain the water from these flooded and marshy lands, they built mills and constructed dams to guard against flooding by the Vistula, Nogat, Haff, Tiege, and other streams." (Note 7)


Inundations were also a weapon of war. In the 1655-1660 Polish-Swedish War, intentional breaching of embankments was ordered by the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus. The Swedes did the same 25 years earlier (Note 8). 

As water levels varied, so did the local responses to natural disasters. After dams broke causing lands to flood in 1667, a powerful government official for Pomerelia near Danzig argued that God was now punishing Poland and Danzig for its tolerance of Anabaptists. The official found broad support among the nobles in parliament for a plan to deport all Mennonites, which did not come to pass (note 9). 

In 1736–37 the area again experienced catastrophic flooding (note 10) and two contemporary historians noted Protestant and Catholic neighbours were also recipients of “good deeds from the hands of Mennonites” (note 11). 

In all cases when flooding occurred, aid from co-religionists from The Netherlands was unfailing. 

Flooding in Russia

Mennonites in New Russia settled where water could be easily obtained—first along the mighty Dnieper River. Unlike in Polish-Prussia, surface water here was “scarce and the water-layer in the ground very deep.” As a result, Mennonite villages were not in the centre of their designated lands, but adjacent to rivers or streams (note 12). 

Over millennia the course of the Dnieper River had shifted. The path of the ancient Dnieper still flows around the western side of the Island of Chortitza, but at one time it went through the valley where Mennonites first established the village of Einlage. What settlers did not know was that spring high water occasionally rushes into that ancient riverbed. 

With high water in 1820, the Mennonite villages of Chortitza Island, Rosenthal, and the lower part of Einlage flooded. At some point a small dam was built at Einlage to prevent further flood damage. Again in 1829 and 1841, Rosenthal flooded, but the damage was mostly confined to their lower gardens. 

In 1845, however, the Dnieper rose to record levels and Einlage, Rosenthal, Chortitza Island, and Nieder-Chortitza suffered severe damage. 

Most famously Einlage was “completely overrun by the rupture of its dam, and 20 houses were destroyed. Damages totaled 8,922 Rubles.” By 1848, these houses had all been relocated, “partly with cash support, partly with voluntary contributions. The height of the dam was also raised significantly. The buildings and equipment of the community distillery were also severely damaged, with a loss amounting to 2,409 Rubles.” North of Einlage the Frisian Mennonite village of Kronsgarten was also severely damaged and was relocated by 1 kilometer on to adjacent higher ground. (This section is adapted mostly from the colony history written in 1848; note 13). 

Rosenthal suffered damages of 2,491 Rubles. It too had built a dam at the lower end of the valley to prevent an overflow of the river into its village. The hayfields on the village lowlands were covered with silt from the flood. Afterwards only four farmsteads could be relocated due to limited space. 

On the Island of Chortitza, several of the houses were almost up to their roofs with water in 1845, but remained standing because the current did not hit them directly. Damage was estimated at 430 Rubles. But the community suffered greater damage from silt on the largest and best part of its hayfields. The houses could not be relocated because of lack of space. The road along the shore, however, was raised significantly. 

In the 1845 flood Nieder-Chortiza was also mostly under water, and suffered total damages of 1,221 Rubles. Because of the great effort and expense involved in relocation, the community chose instead to protect itself for the future with an earthen dike. 

The much smaller Molotschna River—really more of a stream with a broad flood-plain—surprised Mennonites in the first year of settlement, 1804. With a sudden melt, water cannot soak into the frozen ground, and causes the river’s water to spill onto a large flood plain. After one year in its original location, the village of Altenau was relocated further from the river (note 14). Twenty-eight years later the village of Fischau, also on the Molotschna, was similarly moved. Eighty years later the Tokmak River that feeds into the Molotschna, overflowed in 1912. In the City of Tokmak, immediately adjacent to Ladekop, 200 houses were flooded and collapsed. Further upstream the Mennonite village of Liebenau had water on the streets, and Klippenfeld’s low-lying gardens were flooded (note 15). Flooding happened again in 1915, and Halbstadt’s streets were under water.

These are some of the key episodes of flooding in the Prussian-Russian Mennonite story. Expert technical response, local adaptations and mitigation, as well as a theology of mutual aid defined each chapter. 

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes--- 

Illustration: 1888 flooding of the Nogat River at Janowka, https://www.przewodnikelblag.pl/pl/blog/historia-jednego-zdjecia. “Petershagen Land Lease Contract (Pachtvertrag), 1635,” https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/elecrec586/PetershagenPachtvertrag1635GdanskFond779DSygn137/IMG_3285.JPG. 

Note 1: Menno Simons, Complete Writings of Menno Simons, edited by J. C. Wenger (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1984); 558, 559. Older online version edited by John Funk, “A Humble and Christian Defense,” IV, Complete Works of Menno Simons (Elkhart, IN, 1871), http://www.mennosimons.net/ft118-defense.html. Cf. also Peter J. Klassen, “The History of Mennonite Mutual Aid,” Proceedings of All-Mennonite Conference on Christian Mutual Aid, B1–B9. Smithville, OH, June 4–6, 1964. 

Note 2: For this early period, cf. Peter J. Klassen, Mennonites in Early Modern Poland and Prussia (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009). For the history of Vistula River flooding, cf. Jerzy Cyerski, Marek Grzes et al., “History of floods on the River Vistula,” Hydrological Sciences Journal 51, no. 5 (2006), 799-817, https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.5.799. 

Note 3: Reinhold Curicken, Der Stadt Dantzig: Historische Beschreibung (Amsterdam/ Dantzigk: Janssons, 1687), 138, https://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb10805961_00011.html. 

Note 4: See notes 5, 6 and 7 below. On what was grown, cf. Fynes Moryson, Itinerary of Fynes Moryson, vol. 4 (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1908), 69f., https://archive.org/details/itinerarycontain04moryuoft/page/68. 

Note 5: See Heinrich Donner and Johann Donner, Orlofferfelde Chronik, page 3, transcribed by Werner Janzen, 2010. From MLA-B, Prussian-Polish sources (online), https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/cong_303/ok63/orlofferfeldechronik.html.  Cf. Karl-Heinz Ludwig, Zur Besiedlung des Weichseldeltas durch die Mennoniten. Die Siedlungen der Mennoniten im Territorium der Stadt Elbing und in der Ökonomie Marienburg bis zur Übernahme der Gebiete durch Preußen 1772 (Marburg/Lahn: Herder-Institut, 1961), http://ostdok.de/id/BV007004581/ft/bsb00096853?page=9&c=solrSearchOstdok. 

Note 6: Horst Penner, Ansiedlung mennonitischer Niederländer im Weichselmündungsgebiet von der Mitte des 16. Jh. bis zum Beginn der Preussischen Zeit (Weierhof: Mennonitischer Geschichtsverein, 1940), 57, http://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/doccontent?id=33883 (English translation by Tim Flaming and Glenn Penner: https://www.mharchives.ca/download/3408/). For historical maps of Mennonite villages of the region, search by village in Brent Wiebe's collection: https://trailsofthepast.com/all-in-one-map/. 

Note 7: Cited in Peter J. Klassen, A Homeland for Strangers. An Introduction to Mennonites in Poland and Prussia, rev’d ed (Fresno, CA: Centre for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 1989), 1f., https://archive.org/details/ahomeland-for-strangers-an-introduction-to-mennonites-in-poland-and-prussia-revised-ocr.

Note 8: See previous post, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/02/flooding-as-weapon-of-war-1657.html. 

Note 9: Anna Brons, Ursprung, Entwickelung und Schicksale der Taufgesinnten oder Mennoniten in kurzen Zügen (Norden, 1884), 258f., https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/. 

Note 10: Cf. Horst Quiring, “Ein Notjahr in Westpreußen,” Christlicher Gemeinde-Kalender 47 (1938) 70–73. https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Christlicher%20Gemeinde-Kalender/1933-1941/DSCF7096.JPG. 

Note 11: Georg von Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck, Beiträge zur Kenntniß der Mennoniten-Gemeinden in Europa und Amerika, Part I (Berlin, 1821), 42f. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/009717700. 

Note 12: David G. Rempel, “The Mennonite Colonies in New Russia. A study of their settlement and economic development from 1789–1914,” PhD dissertation, Stanford Un,iversity, 1933, 110, https://archive.org/details/themennonitecoloniesinnewrussiaastudyoftheirsettlementandeconomicdevelopmentfrom1789to1914ocr. 

Note 13: Heinrich Heese, “Das Chortitzer Mennonitengebiet 1848. Kurzgefasste geschichtliche Übersicht der Gründung und des Bestehens der Kolonien des Chortitzer Mennonitenbezirkes,” https://chortitza.org/Ber1848.php#Eg; also Heinrich Bergen, ed., Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008), 36-37; and Nick J. Kroeker, Erste Mennoniten Doerfer Russlands 1789–1943: Chortitza–Rosental (Vancouver, BC: Self-published, 1981), 209, and map of Chortitza and Rosental with local dams and ancient river bed, p. 204.

Note 14: M. Woltner, ed., Die Gemeindeberichte von 1848 der deutschen Siedlungen am Schwarzen Meer (Leipzig: Hirzel, 1941), 113, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/kb/woltner.pdf.

Note 15: Cf. Helmut Huebert, Mennonites in the Cities of Imperial Russia, vol. 2 (Winnipeg, MB: Springfield, 2008), 398, https://archive.org/details/MennonitesInTheCitiesOfImperialRussiaVolTwoOCRopt/page/n423/; idem, Molotschna Historical Atlas (Winnipeg, MB: Springfield, 2003), 153. https://archive.org/details/MolotschnaHistoricalAtlasOCRopt.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Flooding and Mennonites: A Common Thread," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), November 5, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/11/flooding-and-mennonites-common-thread.html. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
1 comment
Read more

Why study and write about Russian Mennonite history?

David G. Rempel’s credentials as an historian of the Russian Mennonite story are impeccable—he was a mentor to James Urry in the 1980s, for example, which says it all. In 1974 Rempel wrote an article on Mennonite historical work for an issue of the Mennonite Quarterly Review commemorating the arrival of Russian Mennonites to North America 100 years earlier ( note 1). In one section of the essay Rempel reflected on Mennonites’ general “lack of interest in their history,” and why they were so “exceedingly slow” in reflecting on their historic development in Russia with so little scholarly rigour. Rempel noted that he was not alone in this observation; some prominent Mennonites of his generation who had noted the same pointed an “extreme spirit of individualism” among Mennonites in Russia; the absence of Mennonite “authoritative voices,” both in and outside the church; the “relative indifference” of Mennonites to the past; “intellectual laziness” among many who do not wish to be distu...
Post a Comment
Read more

Eduard Wüst: A “Second Menno”?

Arguably the most significant outside religious influence on Mennonite s in the 19th century was the revivalist preaching of Eduard Wüst, a university-trained Württemberg Pietist minister installed by the separatist Evangelical Brethren Church in New Russia in 1843 ( note 1 ). With the end-time prophesies of a previous generation of Pietists (and many Mennonites) coming to naught, Wüst introduced Germans in this area of New Russia to the “New Pietism” and its more individualistic, emotional conversion experience and sermons on the free grace of God centred on the cross of Christ ( note 2 ). Wüst’s 1851 Christmas sermon series give a good picture of what was changing ( note 3 ). His core agenda was to dispel gloom (which maybe could describe more traditional Mennonites) and induce Christian joy. This is the root impulse of the Mennonite Brethren beginnings years later in 1860. “Satan is not entitled to present his own as the most joyful.” His people “sing, jump, leap ( hüpfen ) ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (Holodomor), 1932-1933

In 2008 the Canadian Parliament passed an act declaring the fourth Saturday in November as “Ukrainian Famine and Genocide (‘Holodomor’) Memorial Day” ( note 1 ). Southern Ukraine was arguably the worst affected region of the famine of 1932–33, where 30,000 to 40,000 Mennonites lived ( note 2 ). The number of famine-related deaths in Ukraine during this period are conservatively estimated at 3.5 million ( note 3 ). In the early 1930s Stalin feared growing “Ukrainian nationalism” and the possibility of “losing Ukraine” ( note 4 ). He was also suspicious of ethnic Poles and Germans—like Mennonites—in Ukraine, convinced of the “existence of an organized counter-revolutionary insurgent underground” in support of Ukrainian national independence ( note 5 ). Ukraine was targeted with a “lengthy schooling” designed to ruthlessly break the threat of Ukrainian nationalism and resistance, and this included Ukraine’s Mennonites (viewed simply as “Germans”). Various causes combined to bring on w...
Post a Comment
Read more

Becoming German: Ludendorff Festivals in Molotschna, 1918

During the friendly German military occupation of Ukraine at the end of WWI, patriotic “Ludendorff Festivals” were encouraged by German forces to raise funds to support injured German soldiers. A first such festival in the Molotschna was held on June 25, 1918 in Ohrloff, and was attended by “a great many German officers, soldiers and colonists with music, [patriotic] speeches and social interaction” From the perspective of the German army press, the event was “extremely enjoyable;” it was accompanied with music by a 30-piece regiment orchestra, and beer, sausage, sandwiches, ice-cream, raspberries and cherries were sold. It closed with a “small dance,” raising 7,387 rubles or 9,850 German marks in donations ( note 1 ). Later that summer, a Ludendorff Festival in Halbstadt began with Sunday worship, followed by an early concert, games and performances by the Selbstschutz , as well as “entertainment and merriment of every kind,” with short plays and dancing into the morning ( note ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite Literacy in Polish-Prussia

At a Mennonite wedding in Deutsch Kazun in 1833 (pic), neither groom nor bride nor the witnesses could sign the wedding register. A Görtz, a Janzen, a Schröder—born a Görtzen – illiterate. “This act was read to the married couple and witnesses, but not signed because they were unable to write.” Similarly, with the certification of a Mennonite death in Culm (Chelmo), West Prussia, 1813-14: “This document was read and it was signed by us because the witnesses were illiterate.” Spouse and children were unable to read or write. Names like Gerz, Plenert, Kliewer, Kasper, Buller and others. 14 families of the 25 Mennonite deaths registered --or 56%--could not sign the paperwork ( note 1 ; pic ). This appears to be an anomaly. We know some pioneers to Russia were well educated. The letters of the land-scout to Russia, Johann Bartsch to his wife back home (1786-87) are eloquent, beautifully written and indicate a high level of literacy ( note 2 ). Even Klaas Reimer (b. 1770), the founder t...
Post a Comment
Read more