Skip to main content

Franz Bräul Jr., 1922-1954. Death in Soviet Gulag

Recently I noted to someone born in the Soviet Union that my uncle starved to death in a Soviet gulag after the war. She immediately asked how I knew this. Good question!

It is a sad but also surprising, almost unbelievable, story.

In 1946, prisoners of war (POWs) and interned German civilians occupied 267 forced labour camps, 392 labour battalions and 178 “special hospitals” over the whole territory of the Soviet Union. The forced labour of Germans was considered by the USSR to be part of the German war reparations for damage inflicted during the war.

A decade later with the political transition from Stalin to Khrushchev, the remaining POW labour camps were closed and the last German POWs were released.

My mother’s brother Franz Bräul Jr. had been imprisoned in one of these camps after being captured in German uniform in 1945. Just before my uncle died (1954), he instructed his fellow POW Fritz (Franz) Müller, “If you are able to write to your relatives, then please ask them to find my mother and siblings and tell them that I died.”

In 1956 this friend inquired by a family near the prison (many Russo-Germans had been forcibly settled in that region) if they knew anyone with the name “Bräul”. They did not, but nonetheless he gave them a slip of paper with the notice of Franz’s death before leaving for Germany.

Sometime later a Mennonite woman named Maria Duerksen came from a neighbouring village to visit this family. A child was playing with a box of papers. Maria Duerksen happened to glance down at one of the papers and said, “Where did you get this from? I know him, I went to school with him!” She had been in school with Franz in Marienthal many years earlier.

A small miracle? What are the chances!

She took that paper with her and could eventually contact a Marienthal family in British Columbia, Canada. My mother and grandmother arrived from Paraguay to Canada in 1955; in 1957 they received a letter from that B.C. family telling my Oma that they had received a note from this former Marienthaler in the USSR indicating that Franz had died. My uncle Walter remembered that when the news came “it was so sad – as if he had just died.” Unfortunately, there is no picture of Franz as a teenager or adult, but there is this fragmentary story.

Apparently he was captured by the Americans, was handed over to the Soviets and then sent to a Siberian POW forced labour camp.

The extremely harsh and brutal conditions of the gulags are well-documented. In the German military Franz was trained as a medic with skills to aid, heal and comfort others. Perhaps he was able to help other POWs who shared his horrible fate. Thankfully in prison he had a friend who clearly cared for him and his memory.

Otherwise we know nothing about these nine years as a POW; perhaps over time more information may be forthcoming.

My mother was 15 years younger than her brother Franz; he was the oldest and she the youngest (b. 1937).

In early Fall of 1944, Franz’s division was active in the Germanic Siebenbürger Sachsen region (Transylvania) of Romania where the Red Army was making significant in-roads. During this time he sent his little sister (my mother) the postcard below, “zum Angedenken,” that is, to remember him.

Their cousin Aron Bräul who was in the same unit recalled the care he received from Franz for his shrapnel wounds. Franz received the “Iron Cross” for outstanding bravery above and beyond the call of duty because he pulled his wounded commanding officer out of the line of fire; he also received the “War Merit Cross” for outstanding and exceptional medical service (note 1).

Because he saved the life of his commanding officer, Franz was awarded a special three-day leave of absence to visit his family in the latter half of 1944. Only a few hours after Franz’s visit had ended joy turned to grief: an express letter arrived at his mother’s home sent from the front from brother Heinrich (also in the same unit) warning Franz not to return to their last posting because the Soviet army had advanced. The warning was too late and Franz’s train had left. My grandmother was devastated.

From a military dispatch we know that on September 27, 1944, Franz was wounded in Lechnitz (Lechinta), Romania on his right knee and lower leg by an explosive missile fragment. Ten days earlier on September 17, 1944 this ethnic-German village (about 400 kilometers east of Budapest) was evacuated by the German military due to the rapidly advancing Red Army. The dispatch notes that Franz remained with his unit.


In those weeks Soviet forces roared through Romania to the Hungarian border (note 2). In Budapest Franz’s division was involved in extremely heavy fighting. On February 11, 1945, the division was wholly destroyed.

The Molotschna cavalry regiment of which my uncle Franz Bräul, his brother Heinrich and cousin Aron had been members was partially disbanded in April 1944 upon arrival in German-annexed Poland. One hundred and eighty were selected from this number to be sent to Warsaw and to become part of the cavalry division “Florian Geyer”. The division had three regiments and each regiment had six squadrons.

From the military dispatch we know that Franz had been a member of the “2nd Squadron Armoured Vehicle Reconnaissance Unit No. 8,” attached to the “8th Cavalry-Division Florian Geyer” (note 3). There was a certain irony for Mennonite boys to be placed in the “Florian Geyer” division; Geyer was a radical leader during the sixteenth century Protestant Reformation who joined with Thomas Müntzer (note 4)—an early Anabaptists!—to fight for more than just clerical reforms. Some leaders like Menno Simons refused to take up arms; Florian Geyer however established a cavalry division to fight on the side of the peasants.

Reconnaissance (or “scouting”) units rarely engaged in open battle but operated ahead of the main division—sometimes twenty to forty kilometres into “enemy territory”—to collect data and information to determine the actions and intensions of the opposing army. Their goal was to remain undetected and thus avoid any contact with the “enemy”. “Mostly the cars were well camouflaged and used all available natural cover” (note 5). Soon Franz was promoted to the rank of “Storm-trooper.”

We do not know exactly how he was captured. Isaac Regehr, one of the Molotschna soldiers in the same division who survived the war, does tell briefly how the American troops delivered as many 18,000 prisoners to the Soviets in that area. Regehr recalled that the Soviet guards demanded that all Russian-born “traitors who had fought in the German army were to rise … . Some eighteen men rose to their feet [Regehr remained seated] … . By the end of the day the ‘traitors’ were shot” (note 6).

Similarly Eduard Reimer of the same regiment wrote that by many accounts the fate of German POWs in the Soviet Union was worse than death, especially for those born in the east like Franz. “Those who finally did fall into the hands of the victorious Soviets had to empty the cup of suffering to the very dregs. Merciless beatings and in many instances a cruel death was their lot” (note 7).

Though the description of Franz’s war years are the most detailed in his life story, they are only three years, from age twenty to twenty-three. It would be misguided to glorify these years, as adventuresome as they were. 

Franz Bräul Jr. was born at the height of the 1922 famine in Molotschna—saved by MCC aid—, survived the famine of 1932, and died of starvation at the age thirty-two. Franz lived his whole life enmeshed in the inhospitable webs spun by Hitler and Stalin, and was directly damaged, drawn into, and ultimately destroyed by their schemes.

Eduard Reimer described his generation as “the Lost Generation.” Franz’s life and finally his death in a Soviet gulag sadly embodied this descriptor.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: From the Deutsche Dienststelle für die Benachrichtigung der nächsten Angehörigen von Gefallenen der ehemaligen deutschen Wehrmacht, Berlin, Germany regarding an inquiry about Franz Bräul (File: VI111 Bräul, Franz, Fritz; 10.09.1922) to Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, dated Feb. 22, 2008.

Note 2: For a detailed first-hand account by a fellow Mennonite soldier, cf. Eduard Allert [pseud., Abram Reimer], “The Lost Generation,” The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), ch. 6 (“In Hungary”).

Note 3: A short book with pictures has been published recently on this division: Charles Trang, Florian Geyer Division (Heimdal, 2001).

Note 4: Cf. GAMEO.org and Wikipedia on Thomas Müntzer and Florian Geyer.

Note 5: Cited in Bryan Perret, German Armoured Cars and Reconnaissance Half-Tracks 1939-45 (Osprey New Vanguard, September 1999).

Note 6: Isaac Regehr, in Road to Freedom: Mennonites Escape the Land of Suffering, edited by Harry Loewen (Kitchener, ON: Pandora, 2000), 111.

Note 7: Allert, “The Lost Generation,” 6f.

--

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Franz Bräul Jr., 1922-1954. Death in Soviet Gulag," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), October 21, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/10/franz-braul-jr-1922-1954-death-in.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...

"In the Case of Extreme Danger" - Menno Pass and Refugee crisis, 1945-46

"In the Case of Extreme Danger 1. We are Russian-Mennonite refugees who are returning to Holland, the place of origin. The language is Low German. 2. The Dutch Mennonites there, Doopsgezinde , will take in all fellow-believing Mennonites from Russia who are in danger of compulsory repatriation. 3. The first stage of the journey is to Gronau in Westphalia. 4. As a precaution, purchase a ticket to an intermediate stop first. The last connecting station is Rheine. 5. Opposite Gronau is the Dutch city of Enschede, where you will cross the border. 6. On the border ask for Peter Dyck (Piter Daik), Mennonite Central Committee, Amsterdam, Singel 452. Peter Dyck (or his people) will distribute the relevant papers—“Menno Passes”--and provide further information. 7. Any other border points may also be crossed, with the necessary explanations (who, where to, Mennonites from Russia, Peter Dyck, M.C.C., etc.). The Dutch border Patrol is informed. 8. Here the whole matter must be h...

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...