Skip to main content

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society (note 1).

2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group:

“… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” (Pic)
With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant.

2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups to Canada. Thousands of Mennonite families from the USSR were the recipients of massive relief aid from co-religionists through 1930, and the beneficiaries of an open, generous immigration policy. These immigrants brought skills that would benefit Canada—and with many children as well who would indeed adapt quickly and contribute in many fields.

In this light, it is also sobering to read (August 2023) of the downsizing plans for the flagship Russländer congregation in Ontario—the Waterloo-Kitchener United Mennonite Church (note 2). The “majority” of members are “in their 70s” and “most newly retired members prefer to spend their Sunday mornings elsewhere.” The church building will be torn down, property sold, affordable housing built, with a small meeting space for the congregation and for Community Justice Initiatives. That is a good vision for the asset, inspired by the tradition.
The building has an expansive Sunday School wing which once housed over 200 children. Those baby-boom kids and their children are also doing many good things—but elsewhere. As typical Canadian children of immigrants, most of my generation married outside more narrow ethnic Russian Mennonite lines. But like so many other urban immigrant Canadian church groups, the gift and/or baggage of language and culture, including church culture were hard to transplant in a cohesive and inviting manner that would last two or more generations. This congregation had some highly educated, progressive leaders, but insularity in some aspects is inevitable for an immigrant church group—Mennonite or otherwise. Perhaps Mennonites did not come with a strong inter-cultural skill set, though their mono-ethnic colonies in Russia/Ukraine were surrounded and by so many other cultural groups—Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Tatars, Bulgarians, other Russian Germans, Swedes, Greeks, etc. (who also lived in closed, cultural communities)—ultimately making them a good fit for Canadian multiculturalism.

In this centenary year, many younger Russländer descendants are looking to rediscover their roots. Their baby-boomer parents who stepped away for a time, perhaps “with baggage to sort through,” now find that they are the “story keepers” and elders and are looking for something informed, wise, inspiring and hopeful to say ... “when they [the next gen] shall ask.”

Here are just two of many possible starting points.
 
First, gratitude. Whatever complaints Mennonites may have about Canadian politics and politicians, this kind of historical or “genealogical work” strongly recommends that those complaints be couched in gratefulness, at the beginning and the end. Where would any of us rather be? This is the country our parents desperately wanted their children to enjoy. Minimally, the week is an opportunity to celebrate and show gratitude for those ancestors who risked the journey, the larger Mennonite faith community in Canada and the U.S.A. that oversaw their well-being through famine to immigration, and to a country that welcomed them despite many reservations of accepting more “Germans speakers” and war resisters after WW1. Mennonite historical work teaches us gratitude.

Second, Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada can celebrate the fact that Mennonites brought and bring the kind of memory and historical perspective and commitment to civil life that builds-up people who want to be good and honourable, and who want to build a just, truthful, honest community and strong political fabric.

It was unfortunate to hear some Mennonites respond to recent pandemic lockdowns or health measures in the following manner: "This government is like the communism our parents fled!” That statement falls far wide of any historical truth, and worse: it inflames and tears at the social fabric of the country that welcomed our parents—that's the kind of thing we learn from genealogical work.

Here the memory of those families “left behind” and unable to emigrate in the 1920s can help sharpen Mennonite gratitude. Allow me to offer some examples:

What Mennonites experienced in the Soviet Union was a context and system designed to break them: break their ability to be good to their neighbour; their ability to be truthful and honest towards officials; their ability to participate honourably in civic life; their ability to grow in godliness; their ability to live in peace instead of constant fear.

Today some Mennonites in Canada love to complain about taxes. Just like the communism we left behind? Soviet taxes were designed to crush, impoverish, starve and break our people and their memory in order to create a new Soviet people. That’s something different than collecting taxes for schools, roads, hospitals, policing, fire, child welfare, care for the weak, and the common good as determined by a democratically elected government. Mennonites developed their own form of internal tax for alternative service and schools, as well as mutual aid where government support was absent.

Many Mennonites love to debate what is true and false, right and wrong and today some fear government ideological intervention in education, for example. Just like the communism we left behind? At some point Soviet communism made the debate as such impossible. There was one official organ of truth. All lived in fear. Those who dissented were arrested, disenfranchised imprisoned, banished, tortured and killed. Books were censored. That’s something completely different.

Canadian Mennonites connected to the church respect the importance and power of faith, and in recent years some felt the government infringed upon their right to gather during the pandemic. Just like the communism we left behind? By the late 1920s the Soviet Union banned churches from teaching children; ministers were heavily repressed; church buildings were expropriated and closed; private scripture reading, family prayer and hymn-singing at funerals or weddings was heavily punished—including heavy fines, arrest, and sometimes torture. That’s something completely different.
Vaccines became a faith issue for some Canadian Mennonites who refused to be vaccinated and then complained about religious persecution. Just like the communism we left behind? What recent archival work shows clearly is that all Mennonite ancestors in Russia—even the most conservative with roots in Chortitza—were freely desiring and benefiting from vaccines (especially cow pox) from the early 1800s and on. Any argument against vaccines based on Mennonite experience or faith is simply made-up. In fact, Mennonite ancestors would judge such a complaint against the state as ungodly.

When a Russian Mennonite critiques any Canadian (or American) political party or government policy today as somehow “just like the communism we left behind,” it is nothing but poor memory, bad genealogy and ungrateful and dangerous opinionating not anchored by history. And it tears at the social-political fabric of the country that so generously opened its doors to us.

Without pontificating, Mennonite descendants can do worse than to dust off the Confession of Faith which every Mennonite ancestor memorized and used as their lens to view the world, including the state, the Tsar, the head of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers, and all others with authority over them.

We know they prayed for the Tsar, celebrated royal feasts—even in church—and had an almost pious love for the "Father of the Nation" (at least until the twentieth century).

This was also completely consistent with the various Mennonite confessions of faith which implored them to pray for the king and government with supplications, intercessions and thanksgiving.

“For there is no government except of God, … therefore all believers … are commanded by the word of God to fear their authority, to honor and to be obedient to it in all things which are not contrary to the word of God. Government must be given tribute, duties, and taxes in accordance with the teaching of the Lord … who says we must be obedient” (1853 Rudnerweide Confession, note 3).

Like it or not, that is how they thought. Their criteria for good and bad governance—whether from the Tsar indirectly or more directly from junior government authorities, or even later with the Bolshevik Revolution—was quite simple. Every government was judged by the church asking these questions: “Can we lead a good, honourable civil life?” Can we “lead a peaceful and quiet life, in all godliness and honesty”? (from the 1853 Confession). And where this was ultimately not possible, they tried to emigrate. And Canada—after strong lobbying by fellow Mennonites already in Canada, leveraging their reputation with the Canadian government—opened its doors.

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada can help us recall and celebrate the fact that Mennonites brought and bring the kind of memory and historical perspective and commitment to civil life that builds-up people who want to be good and honourable, and who want to build a just, truthful, honest community and strong political fabric.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photos
  • Waterloo-Kitchener Mennonite Church their first elder, Jacob H. Janzen and wife. From GAMEO. Jacob H. Janzen, received an honorary doctorate from Bethel College, North Newton, Kansas; https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Janzen,_Jacob_H._(1878-1950).
  • A copy of the Mennonite "Privilegium" (Charter of Privileges, 1800) signed by the Tsar with the Mennonite commitment to the state to be a "model community."
  • 1919 Order in Council, posted on Twitter by Senator Peter Harder, 1918.

Note 1: Ed Fast, Member of Parliament for Abbotsford, BC, Private Members’ Business, February 27, 2019, https://openparliament.ca/debates/2019/2/27/ed-fast-2/.

Note 2: Madalene Arias, “The facility of faith: Fading churches and growing ones both face big decisions about buildings,” Canadian Mennonite 27, no. 17 (August 24, 2023), https://web.archive.org/web/20230829102947/https://canadianmennonite.org/stories/facility-faith]. On the congregation, see GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Waterloo-Kitchener_United_Mennonite_Church_(Waterloo,_Ontario,_Canada).

Note 3: 1853 Rudnerweide Mennonite Confession; consistent with 1632 Dordrecht, 1660 Frisian-Flemish, 1766 Ris, and 1902 Russian Mennonite Brethren Confessions. Cf. Howard John Loewen, One Lord, One Church, One Hope, One God: Mennonite Confessions of Faith (Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies, 1985), https://archive.org/details/onelordonechurch02loew/page/122/mode/2up?q=1853.

---
To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary, 2023," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), August 31, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/mennonite-heritage-week-in-canada-and.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

The Jewish Colony (Judenplan) and its Mennonite Agriculturalists

Both Jews and Mennonites in Russia were dependent on separation, distinct external appearance, unique dialect, inner group cohesion, international familial networks, self-governing institutions, a sojourner mentality, sense of divine mission, and a view of the other as unclean or dangerous. Each had its distinct legal privileges, restrictions, and duties under the Tsar, and each looked out for their own. For both, moderation, spiritual values, family, learning and success were important, and their related dialects made communication possible. But the traditional occupation of eastern European Jews was as “middlemen” between the “overwhelmingly agricultural Christian population and various urban markets,” as peddlers, shopkeepers and suppliers of goods ( note 1 ). Jews were forbidden to stay for longer periods in German colonies or to erect houses or shops there. “If they try to stay, they are to be reported immediately. If they are not, the German mayor will be held responsible” ( no...
Post a Comment
Read more

Catherine the Great’s 1763 Manifesto

“We must swarm our vast wastelands with people. I do not think that in order to achieve this it would be useful to compel our non-Christians to accept our faith--polygamy for example, is even more useful for the multiplication of the population. … "Russia does not have enough inhabitants, …but still possesses a large expanse of land, which is neither inhabited nor cultivated. … The fields that could nourish the whole nation, barely feeds one family..." – Catherine II (Note 1 ) “We perceive, among other things, that a considerable number of regions are still uncultivated which could easily and advantageously be made available for productive use of population and settlement. Most of the lands hold hidden in their depth an inexhaustible wealth of all kinds of precious ores and metals, and because they are well provided with forests, rivers and lakes, and located close to the sea for purpose of trade, they are also most convenient for the development and growth of many kinds ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shaky Beginings as a Faith Community

With basic physical needs addressed, in 1805 Chortitza pioneers were ready to recover their religious roots and to pass on a faith identity. They requested a copy of Menno Simons’ writings from the Danzig mother-church especially for the young adults, “who know only what they hear,” and because “occasionally we are asked about the founder whose name our religion bears” ( note 1 ). The Anabaptist identity of this generation—despite the strong Mennonite publications in Prussia in the late eighteenth century—was uninformed and very thin. Settlers first arrived in Russia 1788-89 without ministers or elders. Settlers had to be content with sharing Bible reflections in Low German dialect or a “service that consisted of singing one song and a sermon that was read from a book of sermons” written by the recently deceased East Prussian Mennonite elder Isaac Kroeker ( note 2 ). In the first months of settlement, Chortitza Mennonites wrote church leaders in Prussia:  “We cordially plead ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Russia: A Refuge for all True Christians Living in the Last Days

If only it were so. It was not only a fringe group of Russian Mennonites who believed that they were living the Last Days. This view was widely shared--though rejected by the minority conservative Kleine Gemeinde. In 1820 upon the recommendation of Rudnerweide (Frisian) Elder Franz Görz, the progressive and influential Mennonite leader Johann Cornies asked the Mennonite Tobias Voth (b. 1791) of Graudenz, Prussia to come and lead his Agricultural Association’s private high school in Ohrloff, in the Russian Mennonite colony of Molotschna. Voth understood this as nothing less than a divine call upon his life ( note 1; pic 3 ). In Ohrloff Voth grew not only a secondary school, but also a community lending library, book clubs, as well as mission prayer meetings, and Bible study evenings. Voth was the son of a Mennonite minister and his wife was raised Lutheran ( note 2 ). For some years, Voth had been strongly influenced by the warm, Pietist devotional fiction writings of Johann Heinrich Ju...
Post a Comment
Read more

“We have no poor among us”: From "Blue Bag" to e-Transfer

Through not unique or original to Menno Simons, the idea of watching and caring for fellow travellers on the journey of faith “where no one is allowed to beg” ( note 1 ) was a pillar of his teaching, and forms one of the most consistent threads in the Anabaptist–Mennonite story. In the decades before Mennonites settled in Russia they used the “Blue-Bag” to collect for the poor in Prussia. In 1723 Abraham Hartwich—an otherwise unsympathetic observer of Mennonites—noted that Mennonites in Prussia “do not allow their co-religionists to suffer want, but rather help them in their poverty from the so-called blue-bag, their fund for the poor” ( note 2 ). It is unclear when the “blue-bag tradition” changed? Similarly, in the early 1800s, two Lutheran observers—Georg Reiswitz and Friedrich Wadzeck—noted that the Mennonite care for their poor through annual free-will contributions was “exemplary” ( note 3 ). Moreover Reiswitz and Wadzeck describe a community stubbornly committed to each ot...
Post a Comment
Read more

Ukraine Independence--Russian Aggression--German Interests (1918)

The semi-autonomous Ukrainian People's Republic was established shortly after Russia's February Revolution in 1917. Much was still fluid, however. After the October Bolshevik Revolution the Central Rada of Ukraine in Kyiv declared full state independence from the Russian Republic on January 22, 1918. The Ukrainian People's Republic negotiated an end to its participation in Great War, and on February 9, 1918 signed a protectorate treaty in Brest-Litovsk. On February 17, Ukraine appealed to Germany and Austria-Hungary for assistance to repel Russian Bolshevik “invaders,” to detach Ukraine from Russia, and to establish conditions of stability. The World War had not yet ended. Imperialist Germany was desperate for grain and natural resources from Ukraine, eager to end the war in the east while containing Russia, and determined to establish post-war markets for German goods, technologies and influence ( note 1 ). For its part the Russian Bolshevik regime was eager to save ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"In the Case of Extreme Danger" - Menno Pass and Refugee crisis, 1945-46

"In the Case of Extreme Danger 1. We are Russian-Mennonite refugees who are returning to Holland, the place of origin. The language is Low German. 2. The Dutch Mennonites there, Doopsgezinde , will take in all fellow-believing Mennonites from Russia who are in danger of compulsory repatriation. 3. The first stage of the journey is to Gronau in Westphalia. 4. As a precaution, purchase a ticket to an intermediate stop first. The last connecting station is Rheine. 5. Opposite Gronau is the Dutch city of Enschede, where you will cross the border. 6. On the border ask for Peter Dyck (Piter Daik), Mennonite Central Committee, Amsterdam, Singel 452. Peter Dyck (or his people) will distribute the relevant papers—“Menno Passes”--and provide further information. 7. Any other border points may also be crossed, with the necessary explanations (who, where to, Mennonites from Russia, Peter Dyck, M.C.C., etc.). The Dutch border Patrol is informed. 8. Here the whole matter must be h...
Post a Comment
Read more

1871: "Mennonite Tough Luck"

In 1868, a delegation of Prussian Mennonite elders met with Prussian Crown Prince Frederick in Berlin. The topic was universal conscription--now also for Mennonites. They were informed that “what has happened here is coming soon to Russia as well” ( note 1 ). In Berlin the secret was already out. Three years later this political cartoon appeared in a satirical Berlin newspaper. It captures the predicament of Russian Mennonites (some enticed in recent decades from Prussia), with the announcement of a new policy of compulsory, universal military service. “‘Out of the frying pan and into the fire—or: Mennonite tough luck.’ The Mennonites, who immigrated to Russia in order to avoid becoming soldiers in Prussia, are now subject to newly introduced compulsory military service.” ( Note 2 ) The man caught in between looks more like a Prussian than Russian Mennonite—but that’s beside the point. With the “Great Reforms” of the 1860s (including emancipation of serfs) the fundamentals were c...
Post a Comment
Read more