Skip to main content

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society (note 1).

2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group:

“… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” (Pic)
With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant.

2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups to Canada. Thousands of Mennonite families from the USSR were the recipients of massive relief aid from co-religionists through 1930, and the beneficiaries of an open, generous immigration policy. These immigrants brought skills that would benefit Canada—and with many children as well who would indeed adapt quickly and contribute in many fields.

In this light, it is also sobering to read (August 2023) of the downsizing plans for the flagship Russländer congregation in Ontario—the Waterloo-Kitchener United Mennonite Church (note 2). The “majority” of members are “in their 70s” and “most newly retired members prefer to spend their Sunday mornings elsewhere.” The church building will be torn down, property sold, affordable housing built, with a small meeting space for the congregation and for Community Justice Initiatives. That is a good vision for the asset, inspired by the tradition.
The building has an expansive Sunday School wing which once housed over 200 children. Those baby-boom kids and their children are also doing many good things—but elsewhere. As typical Canadian children of immigrants, most of my generation married outside more narrow ethnic Russian Mennonite lines. But like so many other urban immigrant Canadian church groups, the gift and/or baggage of language and culture, including church culture were hard to transplant in a cohesive and inviting manner that would last two or more generations. This congregation had some highly educated, progressive leaders, but insularity in some aspects is inevitable for an immigrant church group—Mennonite or otherwise. Perhaps Mennonites did not come with a strong inter-cultural skill set, though their mono-ethnic colonies in Russia/Ukraine were surrounded and by so many other cultural groups—Ukrainians, Russians, Jews, Tatars, Bulgarians, other Russian Germans, Swedes, Greeks, etc. (who also lived in closed, cultural communities)—ultimately making them a good fit for Canadian multiculturalism.

In this centenary year, many younger Russländer descendants are looking to rediscover their roots. Their baby-boomer parents who stepped away for a time, perhaps “with baggage to sort through,” now find that they are the “story keepers” and elders and are looking for something informed, wise, inspiring and hopeful to say ... “when they [the next gen] shall ask.”

Here are just two of many possible starting points.
 
First, gratitude. Whatever complaints Mennonites may have about Canadian politics and politicians, this kind of historical or “genealogical work” strongly recommends that those complaints be couched in gratefulness, at the beginning and the end. Where would any of us rather be? This is the country our parents desperately wanted their children to enjoy. Minimally, the week is an opportunity to celebrate and show gratitude for those ancestors who risked the journey, the larger Mennonite faith community in Canada and the U.S.A. that oversaw their well-being through famine to immigration, and to a country that welcomed them despite many reservations of accepting more “Germans speakers” and war resisters after WW1. Mennonite historical work teaches us gratitude.

Second, Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada can celebrate the fact that Mennonites brought and bring the kind of memory and historical perspective and commitment to civil life that builds-up people who want to be good and honourable, and who want to build a just, truthful, honest community and strong political fabric.

It was unfortunate to hear some Mennonites respond to recent pandemic lockdowns or health measures in the following manner: "This government is like the communism our parents fled!” That statement falls far wide of any historical truth, and worse: it inflames and tears at the social fabric of the country that welcomed our parents—that's the kind of thing we learn from genealogical work.

Here the memory of those families “left behind” and unable to emigrate in the 1920s can help sharpen Mennonite gratitude. Allow me to offer some examples:

What Mennonites experienced in the Soviet Union was a context and system designed to break them: break their ability to be good to their neighbour; their ability to be truthful and honest towards officials; their ability to participate honourably in civic life; their ability to grow in godliness; their ability to live in peace instead of constant fear.

Today some Mennonites in Canada love to complain about taxes. Just like the communism we left behind? Soviet taxes were designed to crush, impoverish, starve and break our people and their memory in order to create a new Soviet people. That’s something different than collecting taxes for schools, roads, hospitals, policing, fire, child welfare, care for the weak, and the common good as determined by a democratically elected government. Mennonites developed their own form of internal tax for alternative service and schools, as well as mutual aid where government support was absent.

Many Mennonites love to debate what is true and false, right and wrong and today some fear government ideological intervention in education, for example. Just like the communism we left behind? At some point Soviet communism made the debate as such impossible. There was one official organ of truth. All lived in fear. Those who dissented were arrested, disenfranchised imprisoned, banished, tortured and killed. Books were censored. That’s something completely different.

Canadian Mennonites connected to the church respect the importance and power of faith, and in recent years some felt the government infringed upon their right to gather during the pandemic. Just like the communism we left behind? By the late 1920s the Soviet Union banned churches from teaching children; ministers were heavily repressed; church buildings were expropriated and closed; private scripture reading, family prayer and hymn-singing at funerals or weddings was heavily punished—including heavy fines, arrest, and sometimes torture. That’s something completely different.
Vaccines became a faith issue for some Canadian Mennonites who refused to be vaccinated and then complained about religious persecution. Just like the communism we left behind? What recent archival work shows clearly is that all Mennonite ancestors in Russia—even the most conservative with roots in Chortitza—were freely desiring and benefiting from vaccines (especially cow pox) from the early 1800s and on. Any argument against vaccines based on Mennonite experience or faith is simply made-up. In fact, Mennonite ancestors would judge such a complaint against the state as ungodly.

When a Russian Mennonite critiques any Canadian (or American) political party or government policy today as somehow “just like the communism we left behind,” it is nothing but poor memory, bad genealogy and ungrateful and dangerous opinionating not anchored by history. And it tears at the social-political fabric of the country that so generously opened its doors to us.

Without pontificating, Mennonite descendants can do worse than to dust off the Confession of Faith which every Mennonite ancestor memorized and used as their lens to view the world, including the state, the Tsar, the head of the Guardianship Committee for Foreign Settlers, and all others with authority over them.

We know they prayed for the Tsar, celebrated royal feasts—even in church—and had an almost pious love for the "Father of the Nation" (at least until the twentieth century).

This was also completely consistent with the various Mennonite confessions of faith which implored them to pray for the king and government with supplications, intercessions and thanksgiving.

“For there is no government except of God, … therefore all believers … are commanded by the word of God to fear their authority, to honor and to be obedient to it in all things which are not contrary to the word of God. Government must be given tribute, duties, and taxes in accordance with the teaching of the Lord … who says we must be obedient” (1853 Rudnerweide Confession, note 3).

Like it or not, that is how they thought. Their criteria for good and bad governance—whether from the Tsar indirectly or more directly from junior government authorities, or even later with the Bolshevik Revolution—was quite simple. Every government was judged by the church asking these questions: “Can we lead a good, honourable civil life?” Can we “lead a peaceful and quiet life, in all godliness and honesty”? (from the 1853 Confession). And where this was ultimately not possible, they tried to emigrate. And Canada—after strong lobbying by fellow Mennonites already in Canada, leveraging their reputation with the Canadian government—opened its doors.

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada can help us recall and celebrate the fact that Mennonites brought and bring the kind of memory and historical perspective and commitment to civil life that builds-up people who want to be good and honourable, and who want to build a just, truthful, honest community and strong political fabric.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Photos
  • Waterloo-Kitchener Mennonite Church their first elder, Jacob H. Janzen and wife. From GAMEO. Jacob H. Janzen, received an honorary doctorate from Bethel College, North Newton, Kansas; https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Janzen,_Jacob_H._(1878-1950).
  • A copy of the Mennonite "Privilegium" (Charter of Privileges, 1800) signed by the Tsar with the Mennonite commitment to the state to be a "model community."
  • 1919 Order in Council, posted on Twitter by Senator Peter Harder, 1918.

Note 1: Ed Fast, Member of Parliament for Abbotsford, BC, Private Members’ Business, February 27, 2019, https://openparliament.ca/debates/2019/2/27/ed-fast-2/.

Note 2: Madalene Arias, “The facility of faith: Fading churches and growing ones both face big decisions about buildings,” Canadian Mennonite 27, no. 17 (August 24, 2023), https://web.archive.org/web/20230829102947/https://canadianmennonite.org/stories/facility-faith]. On the congregation, see GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Waterloo-Kitchener_United_Mennonite_Church_(Waterloo,_Ontario,_Canada).

Note 3: 1853 Rudnerweide Mennonite Confession; consistent with 1632 Dordrecht, 1660 Frisian-Flemish, 1766 Ris, and 1902 Russian Mennonite Brethren Confessions. Cf. Howard John Loewen, One Lord, One Church, One Hope, One God: Mennonite Confessions of Faith (Elkhart, IN: Institute of Mennonite Studies, 1985), https://archive.org/details/onelordonechurch02loew/page/122/mode/2up?q=1853.

---
To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary, 2023," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), August 31, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/mennonite-heritage-week-in-canada-and.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mobile Immigration Central Office (EWZ) Trains and Naturalization, 1943-44

They walked in one end as Soviet citizens, proceeded through a few wagons, and emerged out the other end as naturalized citizens of the German Reich . Below is a newspaper article marking the completion of the registration and naturalization of some 35,000 Mennonite resettlers—plus other Black Sea Germans. By July 1944 all the treks or transports had arrived from the Black Sea region into Greater Germany [most in Warthegau], and almost all were now registered for a more permanent settlement situation in German-annexed Poland—or so they thought. The translation is important because it offers a clear account of the process of naturalization, application and assessment. While not all Mennonites evacuated from Ukraine 1943-44 were naturalized in one of the visiting mobile Immigration Central Office trains, most were. The article and photos fill a gap in our knowledge of that experience in Nazi Germany and how naturalization was approached and experienced by some 30,000-plus Mennonites....
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more