Skip to main content

Genealogy, or: The Art of Whitewashing and Hagiography

The biggest temptation of genealogical or in-group history writing is “hagiography”– literally “writing about the lives of saints,” i.e., idealizing a subject matter, writing about a person or people in an unreal, flattering light. Hence the title of James Urry’s classic: “None but Saints” (quote from an Alexander Pope poem: “Vain Wits and Critics were no more allow'd, When none but Saints had license to be proud; note 1).

Group histories like the Russian Mennonite story are cluttered with myths in need of deconstruction—whitewashed or highly selective accounts, e.g., of the “Golden Years,” of a persecution narrative—either by outsiders, or from the enemy group within because of division—of stories of amazing self-accomplishment, wealth or group accomplishment without recognition of privilege and context—or perhaps exploitation.

Family storytelling inevitably leaves much unsaid, and most of that is up to the family to decide to record or not. For example, a birth out of wedlock is not especially important for the outside historian, but for a family member it may be an interesting and important trail to follow up—maybe because of a roadblock in the genealogy, and DNA results arrive. If it involves a minister, teacher or other community leader, then it becomes a group story.

Next generation genealogists wanting to be proud of their family story often leave what has been passed on unexamined. Upon closer examination, however, it may become clear that someone is missing; the dates don’t add up; it is simply not plausible; a whole number of years are missing from the story; etc. Some writers are conveniently “silent” about an era or critical years in their family or personal story, e.g., of their grandfather’s activity in the Stalin years, or their role in the messiness of German occupation. I know such cases. Sometimes blatantly false information is passed on to save face; the truth can be painful.

Of course, one might say: “Stay out of other people’s genealogy; that’s their family’s story to tell or not, not yours!” But others will counter that that individual’s story is not simply private—the actions impacted many people significantly, and his/her name must be recorded and the story be told truthfully, fully and accurately.

Why? It can be important not only for the healing of family memory, but these larger stories can offer insights and healing for the larger Mennonite family (e.g., for an understanding of congregational dynamics in the past and present) and credibility for Mennonite history writing generally.

A review of the loosely edited materials in two volumes on the village of Einlage by Heinrich Bergen have given me occasion for this reflection (note 2). To be fully transparent, I have long had an interest in the village of Einlage on the Dnieper River because for some eighteen years one of my more illustrious ancestors lived and taught there pre-1828 (NB: notice the temptation of hagiography!).

But more importantly, Bergen’s collection gives a very fulsome and detailed picture of what happened with Mennonites upon arrival of the German military in August 1941—which is of great interest to me. Some of his materials collected are raw and clearly un-varnished. I have taken a handful of individuals mentioned multiple times by multiple contributors in the Bergen collection, and compared that information with their respective “Genealogical Registry and Database of Mennonite Ancestry” (GRanDMA, https://www.grandmaonline.org) entries. The latter are based on existing Mennonite genealogical collections and more recent family submissions, and reviewed by volunteer editors. Some of the entries are also complemented by the individual’s application for German naturalization in 1944 (EWZ form; note 3), where in one case the falsification of the family record is already obvious. I have chosen not to give the name of the individuals, but to identify the as “Mennonite A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H.”.

---

Mennonite A (I, 336) “... was shot as a communist by the German Wehrmacht in the first days of occupation in August 1941. He had first to dig his own grave.” (I, 364): “Chief Officer Hess shot ‘Mennonite A,’ but he left the others (“Mennonite B” and Mennonite C”) free for the time being until the local civil administration (with ‘Mennonite Mayor E’ and assistant ‘Mennonite F’) could take on their duties.”

  • Mennonite A’s story submitted to GRanDMA is falsified: “Died August 22, 1941 … Heinrich was forcibly taken away by the Russians in 1941.”

Mennonite B (I, 333): “... was arrested by the German police of the left (east) bank as a communist. He strangled himself in jail. His son lives in Winnipeg.” (I, 202): “Before 1941, ‘Mennonite B’ was the chair of the village council for multiple years, and was shot during the period of German occupation. (I, 367): “‘Mennonite B’ was arrested in Einlage by police from the left bank; a very tough interrogation followed. ‘Mennonite B’ hung himself in his cell.”

  • Mennonite B is not in GRanDMA, but his father Peter is. His parents and siblings are listed in Bergen (I, 202) as well as his children (I, 337); none are in GRanDMA.

Mennonite C (I, 527; 234): “... was a chairperson of the Einlage Kolchos (collective farm) and executed by the Mennonite [!] police [15 young Mennonite men appointed by mayor 'Mennonite E', II, 117]. His widow [with name] lives in Winnipeg with her sons, First Mennonite Church.

  • Mennonite C in GRanDMA; a false story was submitted: “He was shot to death before WWII.” NB: WW II began in 1939; came to the USSR in 1941. This also conflicts with the EWZ form (written in 1944), which states something equally implausible: “husband was arrested by the Soviets in 1942.” NB: arrests by Soviets happened before August 1941. In both cases—in 1944 and in later genealogical materials—the family attempts to hide a story.

Mennonite D (I, 364): “... was handed over to the police, alleged to have cut the telephone wires of the field telephones." (II, 75): 'Mennonite D' is from Neuendorf. Upon the initiative of mayor 'Mennonite E,' resident 'Mennonite D' was shot by the German Wehrmacht. (II,117): "Mayor 'Mennonite E’s' first horrible task was to have 'Mennonite A' and 'Mennonite D' as former informers shot.” (I, 365): "... shot by the Hungarian troops [allies to Germany]."

  • Mennonite D in GRanDMA: using the EWZ forms, GRanDMA accurately adds the note: “In 1941 he was shot by ‘S.D.’ [Sicherheitsdienst].” However, GRanDMA does not confirm this in the “date of death” for him.

Mennonite E, mayor of Einlage. Bergen gives multiple stories of his appointment/election as mayor of Einlage and then mayor Saporoshje under German occupation (II, 75; 79; 117; 107); but regarding the execution, Bergen notes that now in Canada "Mennonite E" denies any role in the executions.

  • Mennonite E in GRanDMA. “'Mennonite E' was a teacher … . He was a bookkeeper of Dneprostroj [hydro dam] from 1930 to 1941.” That he was appointed mayor when the Germans arrived in Einlage, and then after a few months, mayor of the city of Saporoshje, however, is not deemed worthy of mention. Similar silence on his roles between August 1941 and evacuation in 1943. Both the archival summary of files he deposited in the archives in Winnipeg, as well as in his obituary in Der Bote, are silent about this two year period (note 4).  
Mennonite F, assistant Mayor of Einlage, later appointed Rayon (Regional) Chef of Saporoshje; died in Winnipeg (I, 235; 363f. 366). No special notes in GRanDMA. 

---

Eight Mennonites in total were executed in Einlage during German occupation; Bergen adds names of other informers /Mennonite communists: “Who were they? Our Mennonites, our brothers in faith ... Braun, Winter, Wiens, Heide, Kehler, Janzen, and others. And after their measure was full [as informers], they too were arrested and banished. Teacher Janzen ended his life with suicide” (II, 76f.).

Bergen also names the Mennonite "Police Chief" in Einlage and the Mennonite Gestapo representative and their attempts to change their identity. Mennonite G (II, 118): "... took over the functions of the secret state police (Gestapo) in Einlage. He especially excelled in chicanery against Ukrainians and Russians. Binge drinking was often organized [with/for German officers], especially when 'Mennonite H' took over the role of police chief. Ukrainian girls and young Russian women had to serve him and his assistants. In their police uniforms they were later resettled in the German Reich. After naturalization, when they were told: "Now prove your promise given to the Führer," they suddenly identified as non-resistant Mennonites again and wished to enjoy the heritage of our fathers together with the faithful Mennonites. However, they were taken for ditch digging (Schipparbeit). ... This is a small chapter on the misuse of the Mennonite Confession of Faith.”

The four who were executed, plus the example of the mayor and others, suffice to make the point about whitewashing and hagiography, selectivity of memoirs, missing information, falsification of family stories, silence and ... the need to dig deeper.

Why tell accurate family stories from difficult times? They are certainly more interesting and relatable than hagiographical accounts. When one wipes away the whitewash from family and community narratives, it is possible to “heal memories,” for example, even if difficult and not without risk. And we can do no better for next generations than to pass on honest family stories, accompanied with our own “tentative learnings” that may be of value in new, challenging or toxic contexts.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: James Urry, "None but Saints." The Transformation of Mennonite Life in Russia, 1789-1889 (Winnipeg, MB: Hyperion Press, 1989). The full quote from Pope is give in the front material.

Note 2: Heinrich Bergen, ed., Einlage/ Kitschkas, 1789–1943: Ein Denkmal [vol. I] (Regina, SK: Self-published, 2008); idem, Einlage: Chronik des Dorfes Kitschkas, 1789–1943 [vol. II] (Saskatoon, SK: Self-published, 2010). Copies at the Mennonite Heritage Archives, Winnipeg, MB.

Note 3: Cf. “Index of Mennonites Appearing in the Einwandererzentrallestelle (EWZ) Files,” compiled by Richard D. Thiessen, https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/EWZ_Mennonite_Extractions_Alphabetized.pdf.

Note 4: See recent scholarship on Mennonite E's role in the execution of Jews and others in Einlage: Dmytro Myeshkov, “Mennonites in Ukraine before, during, and immediately after the Second World War,” in European Mennonites and the Holocaust, edited by Mark Jantzen and John D. Thiesen (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2020), 208, 210f., 219, 221, 225 n.33; also: Aileen Friesen, “A Portrait of Khortytsya/Zaporizhzhia under Occupation,” in Jantzen and Thiesen, eds., European Mennonites and the Holocaust, 236. On "strategies of identity modification," see Steve Schroeder, "Mennonite-Nazi Collaboration and Coming to Terms with the Past: European Mennonites and the MCC, 1945-1950," Conrad Grebel Review 21, no. 2 (Spring 2002), 6-15.

For maps: “Commando Dr. Stumpp” Village Reports, Bundesarchiv, for: Kronsweide, BA R6/622, Mappe 86, May 1942 (TSDEA; Bundesarchiv); Neuenburg, BA R6/622, Mappe 87, May 1942 (TSDEA; Bundesarchiv); Einlage, BA R6/621, Mappe 83, May 1942 (TSDEA; Bundesarchiv).

--

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "Genealogy, or: The Art of Whitewashing and Hagiography," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), August 13, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/08/genealogy-or-art-of-whitewashing-and.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...