Skip to main content

When Mennonite Agencies withdraw support from star player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938

In 1938 Mennonite Central Committee took the decision to significantly reduce their support of Benjamin Unruh’s work in Germany as of August 1, and Dutch Mennonites announced the same effective January 1, 1939. What to do? Ask the Nazi Party and government agencies to make up the difference (note 1)! On December 3, 1938, Unruh made the following pitch:

“Germany generously and magnanimously helped our [Mennonite] organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a large movement of people [beginning 1923] in such critical times. ... The fact that finally all Mennonite synodal and national associations formally appointed me as their representative in the field of Russian-German welfare (Fürsorge), had its deeper reason especially in the success of my activity in Germany. … You see that I stand in the center of the global Mennonite [relief] work. However, I have always done this as a German man and not only as a representative of my denomination and not only for the Mennonites. I must not conceal the fact that my consciously Volks-German oriented activity has met with some difficulties among the non-German Mennonites. … The inhibitions of the Dutch and Americanized Mennonites, which they have to a certain extent towards a distinctly Volk-German and not merely denominationally-oriented welfare (Fürsorge), do not flow from a bad, malicious attitude, but from prejudices, which will have to be overcome little by little. … It is quite embarrassing for me to have to accept material support from non-German Mennonites, given my unshakably firm ethnic-German standpoint. I would be overjoyed if there were any way to reduce my material dependence [on them] to a minimum. … I do not think that it is out of line if I approach the Party and the state via the V.D.A. (Association for German Culture Abroad), the Cultural Department of the Foreign Affairs Office, and the Ethnic German Liaison Office [the SS agency overseeing work of DAI] with the humble request that they might wish to assist me, in view of my decades of untiring and selfless ethnic German work, so that I can continue my work, which is still so necessary, as independently as possible from the non-German Mennonites … [My request] comes from a deep sense of responsibility, a thoroughly pure attitude, and the strong will to serve the poorest of the ethnic Germans, the Russian Germans, as members of the great German people, whom our Führer calls to join together in new community. Heil Hitler! Your very devoted, B.H. Unruh.”

Background:

Unruh had been a critical instigator of MCC beginnings, organized care for 1920s immigrants held back with medical issues, was solely responsible for the 1929-30 release of thousands of Mennonites gathered in Moscow and the beginnings of Fernheim Colony, Paraguay, and had facilitated the delivery of thousands of relief packages during the great Ukrainian famine of 1933-34. Thousands owed their lives and/or freedom to Unruh. Moreover, Unruh had significantly reduced the massive debt owed to the German Reich for Paraguay resettlement in 1930, and negotiated interest forgiveness for 1937 and 1938 as well (note 2). For more than 15 years, Unruh’s Karlsruhe office was a clearinghouse for relief efforts for Soviet Mennonite refugees and victims of famine and repression. German Mennonite leaders were angered with their Americans and Dutch co-religionists, but were committed “not to let Unruh fall, especially not now” (note 3).

Unruh was a scholar with a robust vision for an Anabaptist-Mennonite church (note 4). Yet American colleagues now wondered out loud if Unruh was an “agent of Berlin.” Such malicious opposition was coming largely from “the Jewish press,” Unruh surmised to Canadian leader and friend David Toews, Chair of the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. Unruh suspected that the “boundless ignorance” and “folly” of Americans goes hand-in-hand with American exceptionalism (note 5). 

Memorable Unruh quotes however were easy to find: “‘I am 100 percent for Hitler,’ Unruh said … comparing Hitler to the District Mayor (Oberschulze) in south Russia, who was typically a man of action, who brought the Mennonite settlements to the peak of development, and was perhaps not always the most pious. Hitler is the man for Germany, whom the German Volk has to thank for its prosperity today” (note 6).

Financial support for Unruh’s office from USA and Holland had been confirmed at the 1936 Mennonite World Conference (note 7). But now Unruh warned that authorities in Berlin would “not understand” if Mennonites abroad ceased to support his work (note 8). Moreover MCC was—stunningly—distancing the organization from any responsibility for the massive Paraguay transportation debt to Germany as well (note 9). Rather than turn their back, MCC should see the work of his office as “a kind of mission station for the poorest of the poor in our brotherhood, namely the congregations in Russia,” Unruh argued (note 10).

MCC did not know what to do with Unruh’s ideological leanings. “Being true to God implies being true to one’s Volk,” as Frank H. Epp summarized Unruh’s many Bote arguments (note 11). Unruh’s pro-German articles to the Canadian and Paraguayan Mennonite press did not land well with American MCC leadership. In Paraguay enthusiasm for the Reich was high, which Unruh encouraged (note 12). “Recently [1937] I received a letter from a preacher from Fernheim … He is not a political man. But as our fathers in Holland supported the work of William of Orange in spirit and deed ... [and] as the Russian-German Mennonites looked up to Alexander I in deepest veneration and love ... so also a deep, great gratitude for Adolf Hitler has blossomed in many Russian-German Mennonite hearts [in Paraguay]. They will and want to prove themselves …not only as Christians but also as good German people” (note 13). 

Unruh self-identified as a “convinced Christian and a convinced National Socialist” (note 14), and had been a Party donor for five years. He was not alone. An “overwhelming majority” of Prussian Mennonite ministers were Party members (note 15); the same was true in pious Bavaria (note 16) as well as liberal Krefeld (note 17). Their praise for the Führer and his “peace” bordered on fanaticism (note 18). At denominational gatherings Unruh prayed publicly for the state and Führer (note 19), convinced that “Hitler’s spirit is open to the gospel” (note 20). Mennonite commitment to a “separation of church and state” was “also in the spirit of our Führer and his book Mein Kampf!,” as Unruh instructed young adult men (note 21).

American Mennonite concerns in 1938 echoed their government’s growing anger. The US recalled its ambassador November 14, just days after Kristallnacht (the Night of Broken Glass) and the new “Decree on the Elimination of the Jews from Economic Life.”

Unruh now turned to Party and government agencies; they knew and had supported his work with Russian-Mennonite relief and resettlement for years. Because of those efforts, Unruh was made an executive member of the prestigious Association for German Culture Abroad (Verein [Volksbund] für das Deutschtum im Ausland, VDA) in 1932 (note 22), awarded the Order of Merit First Class from the German Red Cross (note 23), and given an honorary doctorate from the University of Heidelberg (note 24). Unruh was also named a councillor of the German Foreign Institute (Deutsches-Auslands Institut, DAI) in Stuttgart, and member of the Central Office for Kinship Studies of Germans Abroad (Hauptstelle für Auslanddeutsche Sippenkunde).The DAI endeavored to strengthen the racial and cultural ties between Germans living abroad and the Fatherland.


With American and Dutch Mennonite support failing, in December 1938 Unruh made the pitch above to the VDA and the German Foreign Affairs Legation Counsellor Dr. Kundt. This letter offers an important window onto one of the most important and complex Mennonite figures in the twentieth century. 

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. Benjamin H. Unruh to District Advisor (Gebietsreferent) for Latin America, [Ernst G.] Kienitz, Volksbund für das Deutschtum im Ausland, December 3, 1938 (B. H. Unruh Nachlaß, Box 3, File 18; undated fragment, pp. 3-5, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (hereafter MFStW). Note: Missing 2 pages are in File 13, December 3, 1938, Unruh to Volksbund f. d. Deutschtum im Ausland. For further background on Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC [Mennonite Central Committee] and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 2: D.R.d.F., 26 October 1938, from BArch R 2/11822, vol. 2, Reichsfinanzministerium, 1931–1942, 327, from Bundesarchiv, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/79493e59-9bf4-4b08-a091-ddca426897fd/. 

Note 3: Abram Braun to Vereinigung Executive, 1 August 1938, 1f., file folder 1938, Vereinigung Collection, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (MFStW).

Note 4: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Das Wesen des evangelischen Täufertums und Mennonitentums,” Mennonitische Jugendwarte 17, no. 1 (February 1937), 6–15, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9305.JPG.

Note 5: Benjamin H. Unruh to David Toews, 14 September 1938, 3, letter, Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization Records, vol. 1315, B. H. Unruh Collection, 1936–1938, file from Mennonite Heritage Archives (MHA).

Note 6: N. J. Neufeld, “Unsere Rückreise von Europa nach Amerika,” Mennonitische Rundschau 59, no. 47 (November 18, 1936), 13, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/unruh_bh_writings_by/SKMBT_C35108052209050_0001.jpg. Neufeld was travelling from Winnipeg, Canada.

Note 7: John D. Unruh, In the Name of Christ: A History of the Mennonite Central Committee and its Service 1920–1951(Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1952), 341; 355n.

Note 8: Benjamin H. Unruh to O. Miller, 29 July 1938, 2, letter, MCC CPS and other Correspondence, 1931–39, file 1, from MCC-A.

Note 9: Cf. Orie O. Miller to Benjamin H. Unruh, letter, June 24, 1938, MCC Akron, “Mennonite Central Committee CPS and other Corr 1931 - 39 File 1 Unruh BH Reports 1938.”

Note 10: Benjamin Unruh to Orie Miller, letter, July 7, 1938, MCC Akron, Mennonite Central Committee CPS and other Corr 1931 - 39 File 1 Unruh BH Karlsruhe Germany 1938.

Note 11: Frank H. Epp, “An Analysis of Germanism and National Socialism in the Immigrant Newspaper of a Canadian Minority Group, the Mennonites, in the 1930’s,” PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1965, 227, 228, 229.

Note 12: H. C. Büsing, Excerpt from Report of the German Embassy in Asunción, Paraguay, on the Paraguayan Mennonite Colonies, June 20, 1938, Akten des Auslandsamt. Fernheim Mennonite Archives, Paraguay, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/fernheim_archives/SKMBT_C35108043009400_0007.jpg.

Note 13: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Die Kulturleistungen der Mennoniten in aller Welt” [June 1937], Mennonitische Blätter 87, no. 4 (July 1940),27, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1401.JPG.

Note 14: Benjamin H. Unruh to Vereinigung Executive, May 27,1937, Otto Schowalter Nachlaß, Correspondence 1929-1945, MFStW.

Note 15: Report on presentation by Benjamin H. Unruh and Daniel Dettweiler at the Brown House, Munich, July 4, 1938, p. 3, Vereinigung Collection Folder 1938, MFStW.

Note 16: Karl Würtz to Benjamin H. Unruh, December 7, 1938, letter, Vereinigung Collection Folder 1938, MFStW.

Note 17: Cf. Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938), https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/.

Note 18: E.g., see Emil Händiges (denominational chair and editor), “Ein doppeltes Reichs- Erntedankfest 1938,” Mennonitische Blätter 85, no. 11 (November 1938), 1, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1277.JPG.

Note 19: Mennonitische Blätter, 84, nos. 7 & 8 (July / August, 1937), 57, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1160.JPG.

Note 20: Benjamin H. Unruh to Christian Neff, letter, October 5, 1936, Otto Schowalter Nachlaß, Correspondence 1929-1945, MFStW.

Note 21: Adolf Schnebele, Mennonitische Jugendwarte 19, no. 2 (April 1939), 32, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9475.JPG.

Note 22: Mennonitische Blätter 79, no. 7 (July 1932), 64, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1927-1932/DSCF0792.JPG.

Note 23: Mennnonitische Blätter 79, no. 11 (November 1932), 96, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25894/edition/24751/content.

Note 24: Mennonitische Blätter 84, no. 10 (October 1937), 72, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1179.JPG.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “When Mennonite Agencies Withdraw Support from Star Player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 23, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/when-mennonite-agencies-withdraw.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...
Post a Comment
Read more

What is the Church to Say? Letter 3 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Mennonite endorsement Trump the man No one denies the moral flaws of Donald Trump, least of all Trump himself. In these next months Mennonite pastors who supported Trump will have many opportunities to restate to their congregation and their children why someone like Trump won their support. It may be obvious, but the words can be difficult to find. To help, I offer examples from Mennonite history with statements from one our strongest leaders of the past century, Prof. Benjamin H. Unruh (see the nice Mennonite Encyclopedia article on him, GAMEO ). I have substituted only a few words, indicated by square brackets to help with the adaptation. The [MAGA] movement is like the early Anabaptist movement!  In the change of government in 1933, Unruh saw in the [MAGA] movement “things breaking forth which our forefathe...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Beginnings: Some Basics

The sixteenth-century ancestors of Russian Mennonites were largely Anabaptists from the Low Countries. Because their new vision of church called for voluntary membership marked by adult baptism upon confession of faith, they became one of the most persecuted groups of the Protestant Reformation ( note 1 ). For a millennium re-baptism ( a na -baptism) had been considered a heresy punishable by death ( note 2 ), and again in 1529 the Imperial Diet of Speyer called for the “brutal” punishment for those who did not recognize infant baptism. Many of the earliest Anabaptist cells were found in Belgium and The Netherlands--part of the larger Habsburg Empire ruled after 1555 by “the Most Catholic of Kings,” Philip II of Spain. The North Sea port cities of the Low Countries had some limited freedoms and were places for both commercial and cultural exchange; ships arrived daily not only from other Hanseatic League like Danzig, but also from Florence, Venice and Genoa, the Americas and the Far Ea...
Post a Comment
Read more