Skip to main content

When Mennonite Agencies withdraw support from star player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938

In 1938 Mennonite Central Committee took the decision to significantly reduce their support of Benjamin Unruh’s work in Germany as of August 1, and Dutch Mennonites announced the same effective January 1, 1939. What to do? Ask the Nazi Party and government agencies to make up the difference (note 1)! On December 3, 1938, Unruh made the following pitch:

“Germany generously and magnanimously helped our [Mennonite] organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a large movement of people [beginning 1923] in such critical times. ... The fact that finally all Mennonite synodal and national associations formally appointed me as their representative in the field of Russian-German welfare (Fürsorge), had its deeper reason especially in the success of my activity in Germany. … You see that I stand in the center of the global Mennonite [relief] work. However, I have always done this as a German man and not only as a representative of my denomination and not only for the Mennonites. I must not conceal the fact that my consciously Volks-German oriented activity has met with some difficulties among the non-German Mennonites. … The inhibitions of the Dutch and Americanized Mennonites, which they have to a certain extent towards a distinctly Volk-German and not merely denominationally-oriented welfare (Fürsorge), do not flow from a bad, malicious attitude, but from prejudices, which will have to be overcome little by little. … It is quite embarrassing for me to have to accept material support from non-German Mennonites, given my unshakably firm ethnic-German standpoint. I would be overjoyed if there were any way to reduce my material dependence [on them] to a minimum. … I do not think that it is out of line if I approach the Party and the state via the V.D.A. (Association for German Culture Abroad), the Cultural Department of the Foreign Affairs Office, and the Ethnic German Liaison Office [the SS agency overseeing work of DAI] with the humble request that they might wish to assist me, in view of my decades of untiring and selfless ethnic German work, so that I can continue my work, which is still so necessary, as independently as possible from the non-German Mennonites … [My request] comes from a deep sense of responsibility, a thoroughly pure attitude, and the strong will to serve the poorest of the ethnic Germans, the Russian Germans, as members of the great German people, whom our Führer calls to join together in new community. Heil Hitler! Your very devoted, B.H. Unruh.”

Background:

Unruh had been a critical instigator of MCC beginnings, organized care for 1920s immigrants held back with medical issues, was solely responsible for the 1929-30 release of thousands of Mennonites gathered in Moscow and the beginnings of Fernheim Colony, Paraguay, and had facilitated the delivery of thousands of relief packages during the great Ukrainian famine of 1933-34. Thousands owed their lives and/or freedom to Unruh. Moreover, Unruh had significantly reduced the massive debt owed to the German Reich for Paraguay resettlement in 1930, and negotiated interest forgiveness for 1937 and 1938 as well (note 2). For more than 15 years, Unruh’s Karlsruhe office was a clearinghouse for relief efforts for Soviet Mennonite refugees and victims of famine and repression. German Mennonite leaders were angered with their Americans and Dutch co-religionists, but were committed “not to let Unruh fall, especially not now” (note 3).

Unruh was a scholar with a robust vision for an Anabaptist-Mennonite church (note 4). Yet American colleagues now wondered out loud if Unruh was an “agent of Berlin.” Such malicious opposition was coming largely from “the Jewish press,” Unruh surmised to Canadian leader and friend David Toews, Chair of the Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization. Unruh suspected that the “boundless ignorance” and “folly” of Americans goes hand-in-hand with American exceptionalism (note 5). 

Memorable Unruh quotes however were easy to find: “‘I am 100 percent for Hitler,’ Unruh said … comparing Hitler to the District Mayor (Oberschulze) in south Russia, who was typically a man of action, who brought the Mennonite settlements to the peak of development, and was perhaps not always the most pious. Hitler is the man for Germany, whom the German Volk has to thank for its prosperity today” (note 6).

Financial support for Unruh’s office from USA and Holland had been confirmed at the 1936 Mennonite World Conference (note 7). But now Unruh warned that authorities in Berlin would “not understand” if Mennonites abroad ceased to support his work (note 8). Moreover MCC was—stunningly—distancing the organization from any responsibility for the massive Paraguay transportation debt to Germany as well (note 9). Rather than turn their back, MCC should see the work of his office as “a kind of mission station for the poorest of the poor in our brotherhood, namely the congregations in Russia,” Unruh argued (note 10).

MCC did not know what to do with Unruh’s ideological leanings. “Being true to God implies being true to one’s Volk,” as Frank H. Epp summarized Unruh’s many Bote arguments (note 11). Unruh’s pro-German articles to the Canadian and Paraguayan Mennonite press did not land well with American MCC leadership. In Paraguay enthusiasm for the Reich was high, which Unruh encouraged (note 12). “Recently [1937] I received a letter from a preacher from Fernheim … He is not a political man. But as our fathers in Holland supported the work of William of Orange in spirit and deed ... [and] as the Russian-German Mennonites looked up to Alexander I in deepest veneration and love ... so also a deep, great gratitude for Adolf Hitler has blossomed in many Russian-German Mennonite hearts [in Paraguay]. They will and want to prove themselves …not only as Christians but also as good German people” (note 13). 

Unruh self-identified as a “convinced Christian and a convinced National Socialist” (note 14), and had been a Party donor for five years. He was not alone. An “overwhelming majority” of Prussian Mennonite ministers were Party members (note 15); the same was true in pious Bavaria (note 16) as well as liberal Krefeld (note 17). Their praise for the Führer and his “peace” bordered on fanaticism (note 18). At denominational gatherings Unruh prayed publicly for the state and Führer (note 19), convinced that “Hitler’s spirit is open to the gospel” (note 20). Mennonite commitment to a “separation of church and state” was “also in the spirit of our Führer and his book Mein Kampf!,” as Unruh instructed young adult men (note 21).

American Mennonite concerns in 1938 echoed their government’s growing anger. The US recalled its ambassador November 14, just days after Kristallnacht (the Night of Broken Glass) and the new “Decree on the Elimination of the Jews from Economic Life.”

Unruh now turned to Party and government agencies; they knew and had supported his work with Russian-Mennonite relief and resettlement for years. Because of those efforts, Unruh was made an executive member of the prestigious Association for German Culture Abroad (Verein [Volksbund] für das Deutschtum im Ausland, VDA) in 1932 (note 22), awarded the Order of Merit First Class from the German Red Cross (note 23), and given an honorary doctorate from the University of Heidelberg (note 24). Unruh was also named a councillor of the German Foreign Institute (Deutsches-Auslands Institut, DAI) in Stuttgart, and member of the Central Office for Kinship Studies of Germans Abroad (Hauptstelle für Auslanddeutsche Sippenkunde).The DAI endeavored to strengthen the racial and cultural ties between Germans living abroad and the Fatherland.


With American and Dutch Mennonite support failing, in December 1938 Unruh made the pitch above to the VDA and the German Foreign Affairs Legation Counsellor Dr. Kundt. This letter offers an important window onto one of the most important and complex Mennonite figures in the twentieth century. 

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cf. Benjamin H. Unruh to District Advisor (Gebietsreferent) for Latin America, [Ernst G.] Kienitz, Volksbund für das Deutschtum im Ausland, December 3, 1938 (B. H. Unruh Nachlaß, Box 3, File 18; undated fragment, pp. 3-5, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (hereafter MFStW). Note: Missing 2 pages are in File 13, December 3, 1938, Unruh to Volksbund f. d. Deutschtum im Ausland. For further background on Unruh, see my essay: “Benjamin Unruh, MCC [Mennonite Central Committee] and National Socialism,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 96, no. 2 (April 2022), 157–205, https://digitalcollections.tyndale.ca/handle/20.500.12730/1571.

Note 2: D.R.d.F., 26 October 1938, from BArch R 2/11822, vol. 2, Reichsfinanzministerium, 1931–1942, 327, from Bundesarchiv, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/direktlink/79493e59-9bf4-4b08-a091-ddca426897fd/. 

Note 3: Abram Braun to Vereinigung Executive, 1 August 1938, 1f., file folder 1938, Vereinigung Collection, Mennonitische Forschungsstelle Weierhof (MFStW).

Note 4: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Das Wesen des evangelischen Täufertums und Mennonitentums,” Mennonitische Jugendwarte 17, no. 1 (February 1937), 6–15, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9305.JPG.

Note 5: Benjamin H. Unruh to David Toews, 14 September 1938, 3, letter, Canadian Mennonite Board of Colonization Records, vol. 1315, B. H. Unruh Collection, 1936–1938, file from Mennonite Heritage Archives (MHA).

Note 6: N. J. Neufeld, “Unsere Rückreise von Europa nach Amerika,” Mennonitische Rundschau 59, no. 47 (November 18, 1936), 13, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/unruh_bh_writings_by/SKMBT_C35108052209050_0001.jpg. Neufeld was travelling from Winnipeg, Canada.

Note 7: John D. Unruh, In the Name of Christ: A History of the Mennonite Central Committee and its Service 1920–1951(Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1952), 341; 355n.

Note 8: Benjamin H. Unruh to O. Miller, 29 July 1938, 2, letter, MCC CPS and other Correspondence, 1931–39, file 1, from MCC-A.

Note 9: Cf. Orie O. Miller to Benjamin H. Unruh, letter, June 24, 1938, MCC Akron, “Mennonite Central Committee CPS and other Corr 1931 - 39 File 1 Unruh BH Reports 1938.”

Note 10: Benjamin Unruh to Orie Miller, letter, July 7, 1938, MCC Akron, Mennonite Central Committee CPS and other Corr 1931 - 39 File 1 Unruh BH Karlsruhe Germany 1938.

Note 11: Frank H. Epp, “An Analysis of Germanism and National Socialism in the Immigrant Newspaper of a Canadian Minority Group, the Mennonites, in the 1930’s,” PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1965, 227, 228, 229.

Note 12: H. C. Büsing, Excerpt from Report of the German Embassy in Asunción, Paraguay, on the Paraguayan Mennonite Colonies, June 20, 1938, Akten des Auslandsamt. Fernheim Mennonite Archives, Paraguay, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/fernheim_archives/SKMBT_C35108043009400_0007.jpg.

Note 13: Benjamin H. Unruh, “Die Kulturleistungen der Mennoniten in aller Welt” [June 1937], Mennonitische Blätter 87, no. 4 (July 1940),27, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1401.JPG.

Note 14: Benjamin H. Unruh to Vereinigung Executive, May 27,1937, Otto Schowalter Nachlaß, Correspondence 1929-1945, MFStW.

Note 15: Report on presentation by Benjamin H. Unruh and Daniel Dettweiler at the Brown House, Munich, July 4, 1938, p. 3, Vereinigung Collection Folder 1938, MFStW.

Note 16: Karl Würtz to Benjamin H. Unruh, December 7, 1938, letter, Vereinigung Collection Folder 1938, MFStW.

Note 17: Cf. Gustav Kraemer, Wir und unsere Volksgemeinschaft 1938 (Krefeld: Consistorium der Mennonitengemeinde Krefeld, 1938), https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/books/1938,%20Kraemer%20Wir%20und%20unsere%20Volksgemeinschaft/.

Note 18: E.g., see Emil Händiges (denominational chair and editor), “Ein doppeltes Reichs- Erntedankfest 1938,” Mennonitische Blätter 85, no. 11 (November 1938), 1, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1277.JPG.

Note 19: Mennonitische Blätter, 84, nos. 7 & 8 (July / August, 1937), 57, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1160.JPG.

Note 20: Benjamin H. Unruh to Christian Neff, letter, October 5, 1936, Otto Schowalter Nachlaß, Correspondence 1929-1945, MFStW.

Note 21: Adolf Schnebele, Mennonitische Jugendwarte 19, no. 2 (April 1939), 32, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Jugendwarte/DSCF9475.JPG.

Note 22: Mennonitische Blätter 79, no. 7 (July 1932), 64, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1927-1932/DSCF0792.JPG.

Note 23: Mennnonitische Blätter 79, no. 11 (November 1932), 96, https://dlibra.bibliotekaelblaska.pl/dlibra/publication/25894/edition/24751/content.

Note 24: Mennonitische Blätter 84, no. 10 (October 1937), 72, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Blaetter/1933-1941/DSCF1179.JPG.

---

To cite this post: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “When Mennonite Agencies Withdraw Support from Star Player: Benjamin Unruh, 1938,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), July 23, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/07/when-mennonite-agencies-withdraw.html.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...
1 comment
Read more

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...
Post a Comment
Read more

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...
Post a Comment
Read more

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...
Post a Comment
Read more

“Mixed Race Couples” (Mischehen), 1942

The quasi-scientific, Nazi-German racial hocus-pocus about “blood” and the Reich ’s tireless effort to quantify percentages of “Nordic” or “Slavic” or “Jewish” blood in order to separate and rank individuals and racial groups hierarchically, and in turn to deny basic human rights to most--justified by some bizarre correlation to “racial” resilience, health, cultural vitality, and achievement by some mythical German racial corpus--is nothing short of repulsive. These theories had horrific outcomes. Yet somehow it was compelling in the 1930s and 1940s to think, speak, and act in this way. Mennonites were part of that story—one which is not so easily unraveled. At best this post can add one or two new elements to that story. I begin in Canada . In two issues of the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Volkswarte in 1936 Heinrich Hajo Schröder—born in Halbstadt and a one-time student of Benjamin H. Unruh—offered extensive explanations of Aryanism and its supporting racial "theory"—e...
Post a Comment
Read more