Skip to main content

“Mixed Race Couples” (Mischehen), 1942

The quasi-scientific, Nazi-German racial hocus-pocus about “blood” and the Reich’s tireless effort to quantify percentages of “Nordic” or “Slavic” or “Jewish” blood in order to separate and rank individuals and racial groups hierarchically, and in turn to deny basic human rights to most--justified by some bizarre correlation to “racial” resilience, health, cultural vitality, and achievement by some mythical German racial corpus--is nothing short of repulsive.

These theories had horrific outcomes. Yet somehow it was compelling in the 1930s and 1940s to think, speak, and act in this way. Mennonites were part of that story—one which is not so easily unraveled. At best this post can add one or two new elements to that story.

I begin in Canada. In two issues of the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Volkswarte in 1936 Heinrich Hajo Schröder—born in Halbstadt and a one-time student of Benjamin H. Unruh—offered extensive explanations of Aryanism and its supporting racial "theory"—e.g., that racial-genetic purity is critical for the development of a people; that foreign blood is poison for a people; that the Nordic race is the determinant race for the German people; that “Frisians” are the most ancient Aryan branch; that God has given every race a mission in the place that they have dwelt for centuries; the importance of a politics of race and a racial state; the yearning for a Menno-state, praise of Hitler, and all of this peppered with explicit anti-Semitic statements. It was so compelling that it was reprinted in the church-based Mennonitische Rundschau also from Winnipeg) in 1938 (note 1).

Later that same year a German government envoy in Paraguay concluded that  

… the Mennonites are of the most valuable German blood. They carry a biological inheritance which makes them into workers with extraordinary capacity for achievement, and which gives them the feeling of cohesion and order. ... Their Nordic blood gives them unprecedented willpower, tenacity and perseverance. … We cannot leave such valuable German racial material unattended. … Some of them begin to free themselves from their intimate communities and wish to grow into the greater German Volk-community. (Note 2)

Some years later the theory and vision was employed with the Mennonite communities in newly occupied Ukraine. The SS Special Command “R” (Russia) made the following early external assessment of the Mennonite settlements within the first month of occupation: “Even today, the Mennonites, out of all ethnic Germans, make the best physical and spiritual impression. … The racial picture is to some extent excellent, generally good. Things German are genuinely adhered to” (note 3). 

Mennonites certainly had prejudices prior to German occupation, but the idea of a “master race” was foreign (note 4). In 1943 one of the two new German propaganda papers in Ukraine published the article: “Blood Legacy of the Fathers: The Biological Power of Ethnic Germans in Ukraine.” It noted that Sonderkommando of Dr. Karl Stumpp had been tasked by the Reichsminister for the Occupied East Territories “to provide a genealogical and Volks-biological accounting of the Volksdeutsche in Ukraine” (note 5). Stumpp’s work on the racial composition of Mennonites in Ukraine was already well-documented by work done before the war (note 6). Between April and May 1942 supporting genealogical information was to be compiled in each of the Mennonite villages upon which residents were issued their ethnic German Volk identity card (Volkstumsausweis; note 7). The cards attested that the named person “is a Volksdeutscher and is under the protection of the Greater German Reich (note 8).

Stumpp’s reports documented for the nineteen villages of the Chortitza District, for example, 223 mixed-race marriages of 8,010 family units, or 2.7%. None of the former 1,066 Jews from these villages and towns remained. Most of the mixed-race families were located in the more urban areas of Chortitza, Einlage or Osterwick, for example, where 7% of children were “mixed-race” (note 9). These reports were crucial for the regime’s assessment of German Volk purity.

Mixed-race couples (Mischehen) and mixed-race children (Mischlinge)—these were legally defined categories—were named, their homes marked (not only on maps), and those so identified were restricted in their rights and privileges. including their food and clothing rations, education, and medical services.

In the months after the arrival of German armies, two German newspapers, public addresses and rallies, and training programs for ethnic German teachers, administrators and self-defence units were among the means used to introduce ethnic Germans in Ukraine into a National Socialist worldview. For those over forty, it was new to think that “custom and morality are not determined by religion, but by race,” or that some existential “Germanic feeling of life (Lebensgefühl)” and “sense of morality … lives within the Germanic race” as a whole. No doubt they were glad to hear that National Socialism supported “practical Christianity,” but were likely confused to hear that the church's ultimate purpose was to unify, strengthen and empower the Volk (note 10). It did not go unnoticed that in the new teacher training institutes for ethnic Germans that religion was not in the curriculum—once the defining discipline in Mennonite schools. Now race anthropology (Rassenkunde) and hereditary studies (Vererbungslehre) were core courses that supported the biological goals of the Reich (note 11). I know at least four individuals who were trained in these pedagogical schools.

A compulsory school policy would soon apply to all ethnic German children in Ukraine lasting eight years beginning at age seven, and was “intended to secure the education and instruction of youth in the spirit of National Socialism” (note 12). Youth were encouraged to follow the example of the Führer who neither smoked nor drank, and were warned to avoid socializing with non-Germans in order to maintain racial purity (note 13). Specifically, young adults were informed that marriages between Germans and other races were now forbidden, and where undertaken, legally void (note 14). Notably students of “mixed marriages” were not eligible for enrollment in Prischib Teacher Training School, for example (note 15).

In September 1942, the N@zi weekly Ukraine Post ran an article on the historical achievements of the German colonies in Ukraine, and praised their “amazing racial-biological prowess.” They are “perhaps the strongest and clearest proof of the inexhaustible power of German racial ethnicity which, even detached from the actual mother soil, again and again renewed itself from itself” (note 16).

Over twenty-five weeks the Ukraine Post outlined and winningly explained the twenty-five planks of the Nazi Party platform to its Volk German readership, with the fourth instalment on the racial unity of the German Volk on October 24, 1942 (note 17). Beliefs about blood purity were deemed to be critical for understanding the “why” of German cultural achievement or decline, and it gave a rationale for Germany’s rejection of universal human rights.

A people can only attain high achievements if it keeps its blood pure. … A mixture of German blood with Jewish blood leads to a reduction in the achievements of our people and thus to racial decline and finally to collapse. National Socialism is the fiercest opponent of that Marxist theory of the equality of all that bears the face of man.” (Note 18)

From Canada to Paraguay and then later to Ukraine, this worldview was accepted and taught by many, and given the implicit blessing of some church leaders.

Poles, Ukrainians, Russians and Jews are rightfully repulsed to read this chapter of Mennonite history. It is painful, but important for Mennonites to document it with honesty and humility. The intergenerational impact of this racial worldview held by many Mennonites less than eighty years ago still needs to be explored.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Heinrich H. Schröder, “Was heißt völkisch?,” Mennonitische Volkswarte 2, no. 8 (August 1936), 252–256 (part 1); no. 9 (September 1936), 279–282 (part 2), https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/vpetk379.pdfhttps://media.chortitza.org/pdf/vpetk380.pdf, reprinted in Mennonitische Rundschau 61, no. 5 (February 2, 1938), 12f., https://archive.org/details/sim_die-mennonitische-rundschau_1938-02-02_61_5/page/12/mode/2up

Note 2: Hans Carl Büsing, Excerpt from Report “German Embassy in Asunción, Paraguay, on the Paraguayan Mennonite Colonies, June 20, 1938,” 7f. Archiv Fernheim, Paraguay, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_416/fernheim_archives/SKMBT_C35108043009400_0007.jpg.

Note 3: Sonderkommando Russland, “German Affairs in the Area of Kriwoi-Rog, Saporoshje, Dnjepropetrowsk, in the District of Melitopol and in the District of Mariupol. Preliminary Statement, in particular the Mennonite Settlements,” November 1, 1941. Translated by Allen E. Konrad. Deutsches Ausland-Institut, Film T-81/606/5396845-854, http://www.blackseagr.org/pdfs/konrad/Mennonite Settlements in Melitopol and Mariupol Districts.pdf. Minor corrections.

Note 4: Victor Janzen, From the Dniepr to the Paraguay River (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1995), 36, recalled as a youth seeing the term “sub-human” (Untermensch) with reference to Russians and Ukrainians in the German literature left in their home by German soldiers.

Note 5: “Das Bluterbe der Väter: Die biologische Kraft der Volksdeutschen in der Ukraine,” Ukraine Post no. 9 (March 6, 1943), 3 (for all Ukraine Post articles below, see: https://libraria.ua/all-titles/group/878/).

Note 6: Cf. Mennonitische Geschichtsblätter 3, no. 1 & 2 (December 1938), 97, 99, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Geschichtsblaetter/1936-1940/DSCF4535.JPG). Cf. Eric J. Schmaltz and Samuel D. Zinner, “The Nazi Ethnographic Research of Georg Leibbrandt and Karl Stumpp in Ukraine and Its North American Legacy,” Holocaust and Genocide Studies 14, no. 1 (Spring 2000), 56. A Heidelberg University professor and later Nazi (Dr. Dettweiler) was invited to the 1931 Palatinate-Hessian Mennonite Conference meetings to speak on “Mennonite Family Research.” Three years later, the conference historian writes, this impulse would find “tremendous confirmation” in the Third Reich. Cf. Christlicher Gemeinde-Kalender 46 (1937) 99f., https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Christlicher%20Gemeinde-Kalender/1933-1941/DSCF7056.JPG.

Note 7: See Gerhard Fast, Das Ende von Chortitza (Winnipeg, MB: Self-published, 1973), 71.

Note 8: See any EWZ (Einwanderungszentralstelle) file which typically include returned identification cards; https://chortitza.org/List/EWZBem.htm; https://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/EWZ_Mennonite_Extractions_Alphabetized.pdf.

Note 9: See “Gebiet Chortitza - Bericht,” R6, Mappe 626, “Bevölkerungsübersicht, Tafel A,” 63 [81], as well as the Osterwick village report, “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp.” Prepared for the German Reichsminister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, 1942. In Bundesarchiv Koblenz, BArch R6 GSK, files 620 to 633; 702 to 709, https://invenio.bundesarchiv.de/invenio/main.xhtml; also State Electronic Archive of Ukraine, https://tsdea.aewrchives.gov.ua/deutsch/.

Note 10: “Die 25 Punkte,” Ukraine Post 10 (March 13, 1943), 6; the article is a commentary on the Nazi Party platform policy no. 24 on religion, as part of a series written for Volksdeutsche in Ukraine. The quote is from Alfred Rosenberg, Minister for the Occupied Territories, who visited the Molotschna in 1943.

Note 11: Gerhard Winter, ed., Die volksdeutsche Lehrerbildungsanstalt (LBA) zur Zeit der deutschen Besatzung in Rußland (Wolfsburg: Self-published, 1988), 143f. Racial theory had been a required course for all schools in Prussia since September 1933.

Note 12: “Schulpflicht für Volksdeutsche Kinder,” Ukraine Post I, no. 22 (June 5, 1943), 8.

Note 13: Wendy Lower, Nazi Empire-Building and the Holocaust in Ukraine (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2005), 170.

Note 14: “Deutsches Eherecht für Volksdeutsche,” Ukraine Post, no. 30 (August 10, 1943), 8.

Note 15: Justine Janzen Fiebig, “Die volksdeutschen Lehrerbildungsanstalten zur Zeit der deutschen Besetzung in Rußland,in Winter, Die volksdeutsche Lehrerbildungsanstalt (LBA), 118.

Note 16: “Deutsche Leistung in der Ukraine,” Ukraine Post 1, no. 11 (September 26, 1942), 3f.

Note 17: “Die 25 Punkte: Das Programm der Nationalsozialistischen Deutschen Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP),” Ukraine Post, no. 15 (October 24, 1942), 4.

Note 18: Ibid.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, "'Mixed Race Couples' (Mischehen), 1942," History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 17, 2023https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/mixed-race-couples-mischehen-1942.html.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

The Flight to Moscow 1929

In 1926, my grandfather’s sister Justina Fast (b. 1896) and her husband Peter Görzen moved from Krassikow, Neu Samara (Soviet Union) to village no. 5 Dejewka, Orenburg. “We thought we would live our lives here with our children secure in the hands of God. But the times were becoming turbulent,” Justina recalled. In May 1929 they travelled back to Krassikow for Pentecost to visit with her mother, brothers and their families. But when they returned to their home, she writes, “… a large quota of grain was demanded of us. But we had nothing, and the harvest was not yet in. Then we heard that many were planning to move to Canada, including my three siblings with my mother, and my husband's three sisters too. My husband decided to go to Moscow first to see if it was possible and what was required for emigration. We made the decision to leave when the harvest was complete. At that time so many people were leaving [for Moscow], and early in September we sold everything we had. Only the b...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Immigration to Canada, 1923: Background

In April 1921 Mennonites in the Caucasus and Don Region officially petitioned Moscow for permissions to emigrate—which Lenin had “flatly refused.” Their rationale was more than economic. “The disruption of economic conditions leads to impoverishment, which again goes hand in hand with the degradation of morals and has an alarming impact on our youth, who are also constantly exposed to the pressure of brutal and ruthless agitation on the part of those in power. … This decay of our spiritual and economic goods will only become greater and more ruinous.” ( Note 1 ) Later that year and some months before the large-scale feeding operations could begin in the Soviet Union, American Mennonite Relief (AMR) commissioner A.J. Miller petitioned the Soviet Embassy in London for exit permissions for 20,000 Mennonites ( note 1b) . He was unsuccessful. Nonetheless in a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, key Mennonite leaders took a decision to work toward the re...