Grouw, Friesland, Netherlands, 1946-47

My grandmother Helene Bräul (age 42) with my mother and her sister crossed into The Netherlands on February 21, 1946. My uncle Walter and his friends—seventeen-year-old decommissioned German soldiers at war's end—crossed a few days later. Peter J. Dyck, the Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) Europe Director offered a first assessment of the Mennonite tragedy under Stalin to his Canadian counterparts.

“They are truly like sheep in a wilderness and the women of 36 years look much more like 50 years. They told me that if I thought that I and my parents had witnessed terrible times in Russia during the revolution and the subsequent years of famine they could assure me that that was mild in comparison to what followed since 1927 when we left Russia. They told me one tragedy after another and it appears, if what they say is to be taken as representing the whole of the country and our people there and not only a section, that most of our Mennonites have perished.” (Note 1)

Dutch Mennonite leader T. Hylkema painted a similar picture of these “bedraggled” refugees and co-religionists in his book Fredesheim (note 2).

The refugees entered The Netherlands with little more than a "Menno Pass." Only 437 of these had been issued before the Soviet Union exerted enough pressure on the Dutch government to close this door (note 3). Nonetheless the Dutch “adamantly refused to return to the Soviet Union those Mennonites that had already been admitted” until the Soviets could offer proof of identity, citizenship, and of voluntary collaboration with the Germans (note 4).

MCC first brought the refugees to Amsterdam by bus where they were greeted by American MCC workers who by-and-large did not speak German. MCC had arranged for a large hotel and some schools to house everyone.

In Amsterdam they could rest and enjoy good food until permanent lodging could be found. On one of days the refugees were taken on a sight-seeing trip in Amsterdam. Käthe (my mother) remembers that she and other children were able to visit a zoo for the first time in their lives. And at the MCC depot they were all allowed to take one item of clothing.

The stay in Amsterdam lasted only one week. Käthe remembers Russian agents coming to their house in Amsterdam twice. The refugee strategy, however, was to be unresponsive to the Soviet Repatriation Commission members’ questions. “Yet, the interviews caused significant fear among the refugees, who kept their children indoors on the days of the Russians’ presence” (note 5). Fundamentally, however, the Dutch government was committed to their security and well-being. Many Dutch Mennonites had been moved by the plight of Russian Mennonites since the communist terror of 1918, had supported the famine and refugee efforts in the 1920s and in 1930 (note 6). Yet most Dutch Mennonite ministers had spoken out clearly and early against National Socialism as an ideology of race and Volk over worship of God, and as a form of “modern paganism” that gave priority to duty, obedience, and discipline over love (note 7).

On February 28, 1946 a group of the refugees was delivered by truck from Amsterdam to the northern Dutch province of Friesland. Helene and daughters were designated to live in Grouw, together with fourteen other refugees, each housed by Dutch Mennonite families. Grouw is a small, picturesque town of about 3,000 people situated on a lake southeast of Leeuwarden. Helene was billeted with H. A. J. van Straalen, who owned a cigar and photo shop on Hoofdstraat 313.

Käthe stayed with the neighbours, the Willem Leistra family and their children Jan and Sjoerdtje. Here they called her “Tini,” for “Käthe” sounded “too German.”

Sara stayed with the family of Frans H. Pasma, who had been pastor of the Mennonite congregation in Grouw since 1921. He was a participant at the Mennonite World Conference in The Netherlands in 1936 where the suffering of Mennonites in Russia was presented (note 8). During the war years, Pasma chaired the executive committee of the Dutch General Mennonite Conference (Algemene Doopsgezinde Societeit) and advised Dutch congregations regarding policies and regulations under German occupation (note 9).

The Dutch had been under German rule since May 10, 1940, and that September the executive “issued a strong call to all congregations to remain faithful to the example of their illustrious Reformation ancestors” (note 10). At least seven Dutch ministers were imprisoned during German occupation, and a hundred or more Dutch Mennonites died in a German concentration camp (note 11). The Nazi SD (Sicherheitsdienst) retreated from Grouw on the night of Thursday, April 12, 1945, blowing up two bridges as they left. That Sunday Pasma preached a “liberation” text:

“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies and the God of all consolation, who consoles us in all our affliction, so that we may be able to console those who are in any affliction with the consolation with which we ourselves are consoled by God. … He who rescued us from so deadly a peril will continue to rescue us; on him we have set our hope that he will rescue us again (2 Corinthians 1: 3, 4; 10).”

Ninety minutes after the service ended, Canadian troops entered the town and were greeted with “indescribable shouts of joy” (note 12). Six Jews emerged from hiding; five of them lived for a few years on the “top floor of the milk barn of Mr. Blaauw … only the medical doctor and two ministers were aware of that secret” (note 13).

The Bräuls now lived in the area from which some of their “Matthies” and “Thiessen” ancestors fled in the sixteenth century, and less than twenty-five kilometres from the birthplace of Menno Simons. The Mennonite congregation in Grouw was founded about 1570 and had a membership of about 310 in 1940.

In The Netherlands Helene found employment cleaning the homes of wealthier Dutch families, as well as doing laundry for the Leistras outside in the back courtyard with a washboard. She did this even in very cold temperatures, and her hands would later suffer. Ninety percent of all the money earned by the refugees went back to the Mennonite Central Committee to pay for their costs, including for those unable to work.

Käthe was put into grade two in the Dutch school system. Not only did she learn Dutch fluently, she also learnt to read the local Frisian dialect from her host family. Dutch adults who all understood German refused to speak German after enduring Nazi occupation. Mennonite Low German was close to the Frisian dialect, and Helene, Walter, Sara and Käthe gave up speaking High German, to the point that Käthe forgot it altogether and apparently spoke Dutch without accent.

The year in The Netherlands was the first peaceful period in many years for these refugees. “Anti-German sentiment was very intense at the time,” and it appears that little was said about the war-time experiences (note 14). Though everyone worked hard, there was also time for leisure—something completely foreign to Helene’s children. Here Walter had the opportunity to skate for the first time, and he also enjoyed going to the movies. Even from the perspective of their Dutch Mennonite hosts, the year went well with “no serious problems with the guests” (note 15).

Decades later the one piece of popular religious art that hung in our children’s bedroom in Canada was that of a guardian angel watching over two small children as they cross an unsafe bridge in the darkness of night. I think the image was a projection of mother's own childhood experience, and her sense of God’s protection and guidance in turbulent times.

Even today when my mother recalls the year in The Netherlands, she speaks of it with gratitude, almost as if she had been delivered by some holy angel to that place of safety and joy.

---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Peter J. Dyck, “Memorandum on Mennonite Refugees in Germany as on July 25, 1946,” cited in Frank H. Epp, Mennonite Exodus (Altona, MB: Friesen, 1962), 528.

Note 2: T. Hylkema, Fredeshiem, cited in Peter J. Dyck and Efrieda Dyck, Up from the Rubble (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1991), 106, https://archive.org/details/upfromrubble0000dyck. Cf. also Gerlof D. Homan, “‘We Have Come to Love Them’: Russian Mennonite Refugees in the Netherlands, 1945–1947,” Journal of Mennonite Studies 25 (2007), 45, https://jms.uwinnipeg.ca/index.php/jms/article/view/1223/1215.

Note 3: C. F. Klassen, “Mennonite Refugees—Our Challenge,” Fourth Mennonite World Conference Proceedings, August 3–10, 1948, edited by P. C. Hiebert (Akron, PA: Mennonite Central Committee, 1950), 183, https://archive.org/details/FourthMWCProceedings1948/page/n31/mode/2up.

Note 4: Peter J. Dyck, “Refugees,” GAMEO, https://gameo.org/index.php?title=Refugees. For a fuller account, cf. Dyck and Dyck, Up from the Rubble.

Note 5: Homan, “We have come to love them,” 47.

Note 6: Gerlof D. Homan, “‘We must ... and can stand firmly’: Dutch Mennonites in World War II,” Mennonite Quarterly Review 69, no. 1 (January 1995), 10.

Note 7: Cited in Homan, “We must … and can stand firmly,” 11.

Note 8: See the 1936 Mennonite World Conference registration list, https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/V_6/box%2015/folder%208/110.jpg.

Note 9: Homan, “We must … and can stand firmly,” 15.

Note 10: Homan, “We must … and can stand firmly,” 15.

Note 11: Homan, “We must … and can stand firmly,” 27; 31.

Note 12: F. H. Pasma, De Doopsgezinden te Grouw (Grouw, NL: Doopsgezinde Gemeente to Grouw, 1968), 72.

Note 13: Pasma, De Doopsgezinden te Grouw, 72.

Note 14: Homan, “We have come to love them,” 50f.; cf. Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986), 104.

Note 15: Homan, “‘We hebben ze lief gekregen,’ Het verblijf van Russische mennonieten in Nederland van 1945 tot 1947,” Doopsgezinde Bijtragen 32 (2006), 246.

---

To cite this page: Arnold Neufeldt-Fast, “Grouw, Friesland, Netherlands, 1947-47,” History of the Russian Mennonites (blog), May 14, 2023, https://russianmennonites.blogspot.com/2023/05/grouw-friesland-netherlands-1946-47.html.

Comments

Russian and Prussian Mennonite Participants in “Racial-Science,” 1930

I n December 1929, some 3,885 Soviet Mennonites plus 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists and seven Adventists were assisted by Germany to flee the Soviet Union. They entered German transit camps before resettlement in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay ( note 1 ) In the camps Russian Mennonites participated in a racial-biological study to measure their hereditary characteristics and “racial” composition and “blood purity” in comparison to Danzig-West Prussian, genetic cousins. In Germany in the last century, anthropological and medical research was horribly misused for the pseudo-scientific work referred to as “racial studies” (Rassenkunde). The discipline pre-dated Nazi Germany to describe apparent human differences and ultimately “to justify political, social and cultural inequality” ( note 2 ). But by 1935 a program of “racial hygiene” and eugenics was implemented with an “understanding that purity of the German Blood is the essential condition for the continued existence of the

“Operation Chortitza” – Resettler Camps in Danzig-West Prussia, 1943-44 (Part I)

In October 1943, some 3,900 Mennonite resettlers from “Operation Chortitza” entered the Gau of Danzig-West Prussia. They were transported by train via Litzmannstadt and brought to temporary camps in Neustadt (Danzig), Preußisch Stargard (Konradstein), Konitz, Kulm on the Vistula, Thorn and some smaller localities ( note 1 ). The Gau received over 11,000 resettlers from the German-occupied east zones in 1943. Before October some 3,000 were transferred from these temporary camps for permanent resettlement in order to make room for "Operation Chortitza" ( note 2 ). By January 1, 1944 there were 5,473 resettlers in the Danzig-West Prussian camps (majority Mennonite); one month later that number had almost doubled ( note 3 ). "Operation Chortitza" as it was dubbed was part of a much larger movement “welcoming” hundreds of thousands of ethnic Germans “back home” after generations in the east. Hitler’s larger plan was to reorganize peoples in Europe by race, to separate

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown,

"Anti-Menno" Communist: David J. Penner (1904-1993)

The most outspoken early “Mennonite communist”—or better, “Anti-Menno” communist—was David Johann Penner, b. 1904. Penner was the son of a Chortitza teacher and had grown up Mennonite Brethren in Millerovo, with five religious services per week ( note 1 )! In 1930 with Stalin firmly in power, Penner pseudonymously penned the booklet entitled Anti-Menno ( note 2 ). While his attack was bitter, his criticisms offer a well-informed, plausible window on Mennonite life—albeit biased and with no intention for reform. He is a ethnic Mennonite writing to other Mennonites. Penner offers multiple examples of how the Mennonite clergy in particular—but also deacons, choir conductors, Sunday School teachers, leaders of youth or women’s circles—aligned themselves with the exploitative interests of industry and wealth. Extreme prosperity for Mennonite industrialists and large landowners was achieved with low wages and the poverty of their Russian /Ukrainian workers, according to Penner. Though t

High Crimes and Misdemeanors: Mennonite Murders, Infanticide, Rapes and more

To outsiders, the Mennonite reality in South Russia appeared almost utopian—with their “mild and peaceful ethos.” While it is easy to find examples of all the "holy virtues" of the Mennonite community, only when we are honest about both good deeds and misdemeanors does the Russian Mennonite tradition have something authentic to offer—or not. Rudnerweide was one of a few Molotschna villages with a Mennonite brewery and tavern , which in turn brought with it life-style lapses that would burden the local elder. For example, on January 21, 1835, the Rudnerweide Village Office reported that Johann Cornies’s sheep farm manager Heinrich Reimer, as well as Peter Friesen and an employed Russian shepherd, came into the village “under the influence of brandy,” and: "…at the tavern kept by Aron Wiens, they ordered half a quart of brandy and shouted loudly as they drank, banged their glasses on the table. The tavern keeper objected asking them to settle down, but they refused and

Mennonite Heritage Week in Canada and the Russländer Centenary (2023)

In 2019, the Canadian Parliament declared the second week in September as “Mennonite Heritage Week.” The bill and statements of support recognized the contributions of Mennonites to Canadian society ( note 1 ). 2019 also marked the centenary of a Canadian Order in Council which, at their time of greatest need, classified Mennonites as an “undesirable” immigrant group: “… because, owing to their peculiar customs, habits, modes of living and methods of holding property, they are not likely to become readily assimilated or to assume the duties and responsibilities of Canadian citizenship within a reasonable time.” ( Pic ) With a change of government, this order was rescinded in 1922 and the doors opened for some 23,000 Mennonites to immigrate from the Soviet Union to Canada. The attached archival image of the Order in Council hangs on the office wall of Canadian Senator Peter Harder—a Russländer descendant. 2023 marks the centennial of the arrival of the first Russländer immigrant groups

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons: Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an influen

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people. Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between. The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper. “[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” ( Note 1 ) In the 1802 C

History of the Russian Mennonites

Search This Blog