Skip to main content

Widows, refugees, the unchurched, orphans and decommissioned soldiers: Building Church in Neuland, Paraguay

They were in unchartered waters when the Neuland (Colony) Mennonite Church in Paraguay was organized on November 12, 1947 under the innovative leadership of Hans Rempel (1908-2001).

Rempel was ordained during German occupation of Ukraine, when “simple, untrained men and women called the believers together, read the Word, sang, and prayed” (note 1).

And for the others? In resettlement camps in Warthegau (annexed Poland) Rempel was encouraged by Heinrich Winter, the "last elder of Chortitza" to “make a new beginning ... like a farmer breaking up hard unplowed ground” (Jeremiah 4:3).


After the refugees arrived in Paraguay in 1947, the church issues were many and the need for innovation was urgent.

First, what should be the role of women in church leadership? The tradition was very restrictive. The men however were largely missing and many of the women had experience of leadership in the re-establishment of church services during the German occupation of Russia. Innovation in this regard was however minimal.

Second, before the Stalin-era church marriage ceremonies had been restricted to members of the congregation, which in effect was the entire adult community. In Neuland, however, up to 40% of individuals sixteen years and older were unbaptized in 1950 (note 2).


The younger immigrants had spent their entire youth under an atheistic regime, suffered the disintegration of church life under Stalin, were heavily exposed to the ideology of National-Socialism, and had experienced so much loss and grief that a feeling of God's absence of God was more real than God’s presence. Not all of the refugees who were ready to marry were at the same time ready to count themselves amongst the baptized.

However some concerns were more trivial and easier to handle, for example:

Third, in the post-war refugee camps and on board the refugee ships there were many who participated in open prayer meetings, often encouraged by the Mennonite Central Committee representatives. But prayer meetings outside of worship were seen as an innovation by some of the older members, who in pre-World War I Russia had been taught to pray in secret (Matthew 6:5-6).

Fourth, in order to build-up the scattered community, the Neuland ministerial established a regular pot-luck lunch after worship on the first Sunday of the month. This too was challenged by some who could not connect this innovation to their memory of church.

The fifth and most difficult issue was the problem of re-marriage.

“Women with their children had to piece together a new existence alone, build their houses, drive their oxen and horses, and clear the brush. And then there were the men whose families had been sent back to Russia. They were without women to help them with household work. Many were trapped in these almost insoluble problems, and they entered into new marriage-like relationships without having dissolved their marriages with the separated partner.” (Note 3)

Initially the congregation excommunicated such individuals; but on July 17, 1949 a regulation was unanimously passed by the Conference of Mennonites in South America that allowed remarriage under specific conditions: If marriage partners have been separated from each other for seven years and have had no communication during this time; or if the spouse living in the Soviet Union or its controlled territories has remarried or is in a common-law marriage. Persons who are already living common-law but whose seven years waiting period has not yet been completed, may only be legally married after the seven-year period has expired for both individuals. In these cases individuals were allowed to be baptized in good faith and have their new marriages blessed by the community of faith.

Opportunity was also given for individuals to confess any guilt and to be granted forgiveness by the congregation. However congregational members were forbidden to enter into new marriage relationships if they knowingly had a spouse living overseas who had not remarried (note 4).

Some twenty-eight members who could not accept these changes around remarriage left to form their own church, the short-lived Chortitzer Mennonite Church.


Sixth
, intra-Mennonite denominational differences: On April 4, 1948, Neuland held its first baptismal service at a farmstead with a larger than average barn in the village of Lichtenau, Neuland (note 5).

"A large number of the people singing the hymns have personally experienced the faith and testing about which they sing. Many of them have come through the fires of persecution and have been tested by the agonies of famine, warfare, revolution, terror, imprisonment, flight, separation from loved ones ... . Hymns such as these have helped to sustain them and have given them courage through long seasons of suffering." (Note 6)

Soon after baptisms began, the old divide between Mennonite and Mennonite Brethren churches reared its head again, connected too to aid dollars. B. B. Janz, the inspirational leader of the 1920s emigration from the USSR, was present in Paraguay when the first refugees arrived 1947 and insisted that all MB churches adhere strictly to immersion baptism, and that all persons baptized by another mode be re-baptized. This caused unnecessary bitter feelings and harmed mutual respect and cooperation. Refugees had all but forgotten this division in their common suffering (or never knew of it to begin with). Moreover in the resettlement camps in Warthegau (annexed Poland) in 1944, Benjamin Unruh (baptized MB) was absolutely clear with new leaders (all were under his tutelage) that that old division must not be reintroduced. But here the opportunity for birthing something new was thwarted.

Seventh: What does a Mennonite congregation do with decommissioned soldiers? Initially this was not a problem. All of the Mennonite men Rempel's age or younger had been German soldiers. But with time, it was important for Rempel to recover this part of the tradition with a major publication for a next generation:

"I was heavily wounded and taken behind the lines. I did not have to shoot anyone; this was God’s gracious provision to me. That being said ... the peace witness of our Mennonite people was indeed heavily assaulted. In the storm and stress of this terrible time it was also widely forgotten. But it was not eradicated; our people recall it ... . Because they are asking, especially in our student circles, I have gratefully undertaken this compilation [on Russian Mennonite alternative service]." (Note 7)

Rempel's account is free of all judgement on those many young men who were plucked from their families and villages and thrown into the war. But it is also a confession that the church was under heavy attack, and in the confusion lost its direction. In the 1970s, Rempel was confident that the church would recover its historic peace witness (note 8).

During this time in Paraguay Rempel was pastor to (my uncle) Walter Bräul--a German soldier at age 16--who grew up under Stalin and had no experience of church. I interviewed Walter years later, and he was grateful that unlike some other faith leaders in the colonies, Rempel had an open mind. And that won him over. And for my mother who was younger, the struggle before her baptism was with "forgiving even Stalin" who had brought so much grief to the family. Here too Rempel was a faithful counsellor. 

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Hans Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland," in 25 Jahre Kolonie Neuland, 1947–1972, edited by Walter Regehr, 65–78( Karlsruhe: Schneider, 1972), 85.

Note 2: J. Winfield Fretz, Pilgrims in Paraguay: The Story of Mennonite Colonization in South America (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1953), 87, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001448782.

Note 3: Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 69.

Note 4: Cf. Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 69–71.

Note 5: Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 67f.

Note 6: Fretz, Pilgrims in Paraguay, 90; also 98f.

Note 7: Hans Rempel, Waffen der Wehrlosen: Ersatzdienst der Mennoniten in der UdSSR (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1980), 147f.

Note 8: H. Rempel, Waffen der Wehrlosen, 148.

Pic 1: Hans Rempel, from idem, Waffen der Wehrlosen; Pic 2: Volendam Colony, in P. and E. Dyck, Up from the Rubble; Pic 3: Regehr, 25 Jahre Kolonie Neuland.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

1923 Mennonite immigrants "kept behind": Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp

An important part of the larger 1923 immigration story includes the chapter of the hundreds who were held back at Riga and Southampton and taken to the Lechfeld (Bavaria) transit camp for medical care. “Germany generously and magnanimously helped our organizations, on my intercession, to overcome the manifold difficulties connected with such a ( Volksbewegung ) movement of people in such critical times,” Benjamin H. Unruh wrote some years later ( note 1 ). Just as the first group of Russländer Mennonites set foot in Canada 100 years ago this month, the North American relief effort in the USSR was also winding down (August 1923). The famine relief work in 1921 and 1922 had found broad support in the North American Mennonite community. However excitement about a larger immigration of Russian Mennonites to North America was muted, and a new call to action could not forge the same level of cooperation across Mennonite groups. The plan required huge money guarantees. In USSR B.B. Janz h...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

Vaccinations in Chortitza and Molotschna, beginning in 1804

Vaccination lists for Chortitza Mennonite children in 1809 and 1814 were published prior to the COVID-19 pandemic with little curiosity ( note 1 ). However during the 2020-22 pandemic and in a context in which some refused to vaccinate for religious belief, the historic data took on new significance. Ancestors of some of the more conservative Russian Mennonite groups—like the Reinländer or the Bergthalers or the adult children of land delegate Jacob Höppner—were in fact vaccinating their infants and toddlers against small pox over two hundred years ago ( note 2 ). Also before the current pandemic Ukrainian historian Dmytro Myeshkov brought to light other archival materials on Mennonites and vaccination. The material below is my summary and translation of the relevant pages of Myeshkov’s massive 2008 volume on Black Sea German and their Worlds, 1781 to 1871 (German only; note 3 ). Myeshkov confirms that Chortitza was already immunizing its children in 1804 when their District Offic...

What does it cost to settle a Refugee? Basic without Medical Care (1930)

In January 1930, the Mennonite Central Committee was scrambling to get 3,885 Mennonites out of Germany and settled somewhere fast. These refugees had fled via Moscow in December 1929, and Germany was willing only to serve as first transit stop ( note 1 ). Canada was very reluctant to take any German-speaking Mennonites—the Great Depression had begun and a negative memory of war resistance still lingered. In the end Canada took 1,344 Mennonites and the USA took none born in Russia. Paraguay was the next best option ( note 2 ). The German government preferred Brazil, but Brazil would not guarantee freedom from military service, which was a problem for American Mennonite financiers. There were already some conservative "cousins" from Manitoba in Paraguay who had negotiated with the government and learned through trial and error how to survive in the "Green Hell" of the Paraguayan Chaco. MCC with the assistance of a German aid organization purchased and distribute...

More Royal News! Mennonites give gifts of “Oxen, Butter, Ducks, Hens & Cheese” to new King (1772)

What do Mennonites offer a new king? The ritual ceremonies of homage to a new European king—as we see on TV these days--are ancient. Exactly 250 years yesterday, Frederick the Great became king over Mennonites in the Vistula River Delta where most of our ancestors lived. Here is how that played out. On May 31, 1772, Heinrich Donner was elected elder of the Orlofferfelde Mennonite Church, 25 km north of Marienburg Castle in Polish-Prussia; thankfully he kept a diary ( note 1 ). Only a few months later the weak Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth collapsed and was partitioned by powerful, land-hungry neighbours: Austria, Prussia and Catherine the Great’s empire. In the preceding decades Mennonites had lived with significant autonomy, felt secure under the Polish crown and could appeal to the king for protection . Now some 2,638 Mennonite families were under Prussian rule. Frederick II took possession of his new lands on September 13, and then invited four persons of nobility plus clergy from ...

Molotschna: The final months, Summer 1943

These photos are from German propaganda material filmed in Molotschna (called "Halbstadt") in 1943—just a few months before the evacuation from Ukraine and trek to German-annexed Poland (Warthegau). Not all of the film is of the Mennonite settlement, however, but much of it is. Below are some frames from the film. The edited shorter version is of higher quality and designed as propaganda to be consumed by Germans in the Reich and to secure their approval .  The scenes are marked by cleanliness, orderliness and discipline. There is economic activity, a model Kindergarten, and always happy ethnic German people in the newly occupied territories. A predominantly Mennonite Cavalry Regiment (Waffen-SS) guarding Ukrainian and Russian workers is also highlighted. This hard to see and disturbing. Anything that may have been good here for Mennonites meant enslavement, hunger and death for untold numbers of others. Two versions of the film are available: Shorter (edited for l...

Flemish Anabaptists and Witch Hunts

Political leaders have long used the term "witch hunt"--and there is an historical connection to Mennonites. Anabaptists and so-called “witches” were arrested and tried for related reasons in the Low Countries in the 1500s: namely, as a means to divert God’s wrath. The late-Medievals feared that heresy—in this case ana-baptism and the challenge to other sacraments—invited the wrath of God, and was an instrument for the devil’s own hellish apocalyptic assault. The assumption: the devil's tactics to destroy Christendom included the use of both heretics and sorcerers. Gary Waite writes convincingly that both were seen as “polluting” the community and thus both had to be "excised." "This fear of pollution, or scandalizing God or the saints, also explains why small numbers of peaceable Mennonites were so harshly treated during the second half of the sixteenth century. Plagues, fires, and economic and social crises were often blamed on the presence of even a smal...