Skip to main content

Widows, refugees, the unchurched, orphans and decommissioned soldiers: Building Church in Neuland, Paraguay

They were in unchartered waters when the Neuland (Colony) Mennonite Church in Paraguay was organized on November 12, 1947 under the innovative leadership of Hans Rempel (1908-2001).

Rempel was ordained during German occupation of Ukraine, when “simple, untrained men and women called the believers together, read the Word, sang, and prayed” (note 1).

And for the others? In resettlement camps in Warthegau (annexed Poland) Rempel was encouraged by Heinrich Winter, the "last elder of Chortitza" to “make a new beginning ... like a farmer breaking up hard unplowed ground” (Jeremiah 4:3).


After the refugees arrived in Paraguay in 1947, the church issues were many and the need for innovation was urgent.

First, what should be the role of women in church leadership? The tradition was very restrictive. The men however were largely missing and many of the women had experience of leadership in the re-establishment of church services during the German occupation of Russia. Innovation in this regard was however minimal.

Second, before the Stalin-era church marriage ceremonies had been restricted to members of the congregation, which in effect was the entire adult community. In Neuland, however, up to 40% of individuals sixteen years and older were unbaptized in 1950 (note 2).


The younger immigrants had spent their entire youth under an atheistic regime, suffered the disintegration of church life under Stalin, were heavily exposed to the ideology of National-Socialism, and had experienced so much loss and grief that a feeling of God's absence of God was more real than God’s presence. Not all of the refugees who were ready to marry were at the same time ready to count themselves amongst the baptized.

However some concerns were more trivial and easier to handle, for example:

Third, in the post-war refugee camps and on board the refugee ships there were many who participated in open prayer meetings, often encouraged by the Mennonite Central Committee representatives. But prayer meetings outside of worship were seen as an innovation by some of the older members, who in pre-World War I Russia had been taught to pray in secret (Matthew 6:5-6).

Fourth, in order to build-up the scattered community, the Neuland ministerial established a regular pot-luck lunch after worship on the first Sunday of the month. This too was challenged by some who could not connect this innovation to their memory of church.

The fifth and most difficult issue was the problem of re-marriage.

“Women with their children had to piece together a new existence alone, build their houses, drive their oxen and horses, and clear the brush. And then there were the men whose families had been sent back to Russia. They were without women to help them with household work. Many were trapped in these almost insoluble problems, and they entered into new marriage-like relationships without having dissolved their marriages with the separated partner.” (Note 3)

Initially the congregation excommunicated such individuals; but on July 17, 1949 a regulation was unanimously passed by the Conference of Mennonites in South America that allowed remarriage under specific conditions: If marriage partners have been separated from each other for seven years and have had no communication during this time; or if the spouse living in the Soviet Union or its controlled territories has remarried or is in a common-law marriage. Persons who are already living common-law but whose seven years waiting period has not yet been completed, may only be legally married after the seven-year period has expired for both individuals. In these cases individuals were allowed to be baptized in good faith and have their new marriages blessed by the community of faith.

Opportunity was also given for individuals to confess any guilt and to be granted forgiveness by the congregation. However congregational members were forbidden to enter into new marriage relationships if they knowingly had a spouse living overseas who had not remarried (note 4).

Some twenty-eight members who could not accept these changes around remarriage left to form their own church, the short-lived Chortitzer Mennonite Church.


Sixth
, intra-Mennonite denominational differences: On April 4, 1948, Neuland held its first baptismal service at a farmstead with a larger than average barn in the village of Lichtenau, Neuland (note 5).

"A large number of the people singing the hymns have personally experienced the faith and testing about which they sing. Many of them have come through the fires of persecution and have been tested by the agonies of famine, warfare, revolution, terror, imprisonment, flight, separation from loved ones ... . Hymns such as these have helped to sustain them and have given them courage through long seasons of suffering." (Note 6)

Soon after baptisms began, the old divide between Mennonite and Mennonite Brethren churches reared its head again, connected too to aid dollars. B. B. Janz, the inspirational leader of the 1920s emigration from the USSR, was present in Paraguay when the first refugees arrived 1947 and insisted that all MB churches adhere strictly to immersion baptism, and that all persons baptized by another mode be re-baptized. This caused unnecessary bitter feelings and harmed mutual respect and cooperation. Refugees had all but forgotten this division in their common suffering (or never knew of it to begin with). Moreover in the resettlement camps in Warthegau (annexed Poland) in 1944, Benjamin Unruh (baptized MB) was absolutely clear with new leaders (all were under his tutelage) that that old division must not be reintroduced. But here the opportunity for birthing something new was thwarted.

Seventh: What does a Mennonite congregation do with decommissioned soldiers? Initially this was not a problem. All of the Mennonite men Rempel's age or younger had been German soldiers. But with time, it was important for Rempel to recover this part of the tradition with a major publication for a next generation:

"I was heavily wounded and taken behind the lines. I did not have to shoot anyone; this was God’s gracious provision to me. That being said ... the peace witness of our Mennonite people was indeed heavily assaulted. In the storm and stress of this terrible time it was also widely forgotten. But it was not eradicated; our people recall it ... . Because they are asking, especially in our student circles, I have gratefully undertaken this compilation [on Russian Mennonite alternative service]." (Note 7)

Rempel's account is free of all judgement on those many young men who were plucked from their families and villages and thrown into the war. But it is also a confession that the church was under heavy attack, and in the confusion lost its direction. In the 1970s, Rempel was confident that the church would recover its historic peace witness (note 8).

During this time in Paraguay Rempel was pastor to (my uncle) Walter Bräul--a German soldier at age 16--who grew up under Stalin and had no experience of church. I interviewed Walter years later, and he was grateful that unlike some other faith leaders in the colonies, Rempel had an open mind. And that won him over. And for my mother who was younger, the struggle before her baptism was with "forgiving even Stalin" who had brought so much grief to the family. Here too Rempel was a faithful counsellor. 

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Hans Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland," in 25 Jahre Kolonie Neuland, 1947–1972, edited by Walter Regehr, 65–78( Karlsruhe: Schneider, 1972), 85.

Note 2: J. Winfield Fretz, Pilgrims in Paraguay: The Story of Mennonite Colonization in South America (Scottdale, PA: Herald, 1953), 87, https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001448782.

Note 3: Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 69.

Note 4: Cf. Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 69–71.

Note 5: Rempel, “Vom Anfang der Mennonitengemeinde in Neuland,” 67f.

Note 6: Fretz, Pilgrims in Paraguay, 90; also 98f.

Note 7: Hans Rempel, Waffen der Wehrlosen: Ersatzdienst der Mennoniten in der UdSSR (Winnipeg, MB: CMBC, 1980), 147f.

Note 8: H. Rempel, Waffen der Wehrlosen, 148.

Pic 1: Hans Rempel, from idem, Waffen der Wehrlosen; Pic 2: Volendam Colony, in P. and E. Dyck, Up from the Rubble; Pic 3: Regehr, 25 Jahre Kolonie Neuland.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons!

Turning Weapons into Waffle Irons:  Heart-Shaped Waffles and a smooth talking General In 1874 with Mennonite immigration to North America in full swing, the Tsar sent General Eduard von Totleben to the colonies to talk the remaining Mennonites out of leaving ( note 1 ). He came with the now legendary offer of alternative service. Totleben made presentations in Mennonite churches and had many conversations in Mennonite homes. Decades later the women still recalled how fond Totleben was of Mennonite heart-shaped waffles. He complemented the women saying, “How beautiful are the hearts of Mennonites!,” and he joked about how “much Mennonites love waffles ( Waffeln ), but not weapons ( Waffen )” ( note 2 )! His visit resulted in an extensive reversal of opinion and the offer was welcomed officially by the Molotschna and Chortitza Colony ministerials. And upon leaving, the general was gifted with a poem by Bernhard Harder ( note 3 ) and a waffle iron ( note 4 ). Harder was an inf...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp, 1942: List and Links

Each of the "Commando Dr. Stumpp" village reports written during German occupation of Ukraine 1942 contains a mountain of demographic data, names, dates, occupations, numbers of untimely deaths (revolution, famines, abductions), narratives of life in the 1930s, of repression and liberation, maps, and much more. The reports are critical for telling the story of Mennonites in the Soviet Union before 1942, albeit written with the dynamics of Nazi German rule at play. Reports for some 56 (predominantly) Mennonite villages from the historic Mennonite settlement areas of Chortitza, Sagradovka, Baratow, Schlachtin, Milorodovka, and Borosenko have survived. Unfortunately no village reports from the Molotschna area (known under occupation as “Halbstadt”) have been found. Dr. Karl Stumpp, a prolific chronicler of “Germans abroad,” became well-known to German Mennonites (Prof. Benjamin Unruh/ Dr. Walter Quiring) before the war as the director of the Research Center for Russian Germans...

"A Small Town near Auschwitz” – Chortitza Mennonite Refugee/ Resettlement Camps

Simple proximity to a place of horrors does not equal knowledge or complicity. Many Gnadenfeld-area Mennonite refugees were, for example, temporarily housed 20 km. away from the Bergen-Belsen Concentration Camp where 15-year-old Anne Frank died ultimately of typhus ( note 1 ). The day after liberation by British troops on April 15, 1945, camp survivors began to flow through neighbouring villages. “What a sight they were! They had been tortured and starved, and were swollen from lack of food. … We could hardly believe that the glorious country of Germany could commit such crimes against people,” Susanna Toews wrote ( note 2 ). My mother was only seven, but she remembers overhearing shocking descriptions given by their host family’s teenaged girls forced by the British to clean some of the camp buses. What about the much larger death camp at Auschwitz? There is a book entitled: A Small Town near Auschwitz: Ordinary Nazis and the Holocaust. It is about an administrator living near the ...

1921: Formation of the “Union of Citizens of Dutch Lineage in Ukraine”

Famine was imminent; unprecedented drought; taxes and requisitions exceeded what was harvested; some villages had no horses; extortion and arrests were widespread; many men were disenfranchised and barred from village affairs (see note 1 ). Lenin responded with the 1921 “New Economic Policy” (NEP), which allowed for a degree of market flexibility within the context of socialism to ward off complete economic collapse. A fixed-tax was imposed, grain quotas were eased, farmers were allowed a small amount of land and could sell excess produce at free-market prices after taxes had been paid. Much was in the air. In secret talks, Soviet Trade Commissar Leonid Krasin told the head of the Eastern Section in the German Foreign Office, Gustav Behrendt, that the USSR was “prepared—just like Catherine the Great of old—to call hundreds of thousands of German colonists into the land and transfer them to large, closed complexes for settlement,” especially in Turkestan and the North Caucasus, be...

Mennonites and the Crimean War (1853-56)

Martin Klaassen was traveling through the Molotschna Mennonite Colony when the Crimean War broke out in 1853 ( note 1 ). His diary notes that the following hymn was sung before the sermon: December 1853 . With regards to the war which broke out between Russia and Turkey, the song, No: 723 “O Lord, the clouds of war are threatening now, above our heads we see them roll” was sung before the sermon” ( note 2 ). As the war effort grew, thousands of troops came through Molotschna: January 14, 1854 . Today our colony has received billets: in Halbstadt about 1,000 soldiers. It is said that Joh. Neufelds have offered liquor ( Branntwein ), naturally without charge. The soldiers are supposed to have marched in with jubilant singing and much hilarity. They had been very happy for the wonderful reception they got, and promised to accomplish great things. In March, England and France also declared war on Russia. March 26, 1854 . At noon today there was suddenly a military transport at ...

1920s: Those who left and those who stayed behind

The picture below is my grandmother's family in 1928. Some could leave but most stayed behind. In 1928 a small group of some 511 Soviet Mennonites were unexpectedly approved for emigration ( note 1 ). None of the circa 21,000 Mennonites who emigrated from Russia in the 1920s “simply” left. And for everyone who left, at least three more hoped to leave but couldn’t. It is a complex story. Canada only wanted a certain type—young healthy farmers—and not all were transparent about their skills and intentions The Soviet Union wanted to rid itself of a specifically-defined “excess,” and Mennonite leadership knew how to leverage that Estate owners, and Selbstschutz /White Army militia were the first to be helped to leave, because they were deemed as most threatened community members; What role did money play? Thousands paid cash for their tickets; Who made the final decision on group lists, and for which regions? This was not transparent. Exit visa applications were also regularly reje...

Molotschna Elder Heinrich Dirks and tensions with Mennonite Brethren

Russian Mennonites were not always kind to each other—and nowhere is this seen better than in the tensions between “old” Mennonites and the “separatist” Mennonite Brethren, who had their beginnings in Gnadenfeld, Molotschna in 1860. Heinrich Dirks (1842-1915) was the first Russian Mennonite overseas missionary and later long-time Gnadenfeld, Molotschna ( note 1 ). Everything about Dirks’ life suggests that he would have joined the Brethren in 1860. He too was influenced by the "powerful and gripping” conversionist ministry of Eduard Wüst in his youth. Dirks was a young adult in the Gnadenfeld congregation in South Russia where the Mennonite Brethren /separatist movement began. Shortly thereafter, he was trained in the German pietist Barmen Mission School (1863-67), and famously travelled to Sumatra (Indonesia) where he started a mission outpost and school. The Mennonite Brethren too would later connect the global mission imperative with the impending return of Christ as did Dirk...