Skip to main content

Blessed are the Shoe-Makers: Brief History of Lost Soles

A collection of simple artefacts like shoes can open windows onto the life and story of a people.

Below are a few observations about shoes and boots, or the lack thereof, and their connection to the social and cultural history of Russian Mennonites. Curiously Mennonites arrived in New Russia shoe poor in 1789, and were evacuated as shoe poor in 1943 as when their ancestors arrived--and there are many stories in between.

The poverty of the first Flemish elder in Chortitza Bernhard Penner was so great that he had only his home-made Bastelschuhe in which to serve the Lord’s Supper.

“[Consequently] four of the participating brethren banded together to buy him a pair of boots which one of the [Land] delegates, Bartsch, made for him. The poor community desired with all its heart to partake of the holy sacrament, but when they remembered the solemnity of these occasions in their former homeland, where they dressed in their Sunday best, there was loud sobbing.” (Note 1)

In the 1802 Chortitza Colony census, however, we see that Isaac Kasdorf in Rosenthal is a shoe-maker. The 1810 Chortitza Colony census also gives the following note to four landholders: “ist ein Schuh macher,” i.e., is a shoe-maker (pic). The 1811 lists six shoe-makers; the 1816 has only two (note 2).

For the next 100 years there was no lack of footwear in the Russian Mennonite colonies, and it is hard to find mention of shoes and boots at all.

This changes with the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution and its aftermath. During the years of upheaval footwear was a regularly stolen commodity. A few diary entries from Jacob P. Janzen of Rudnerweide offer a fuller picture (note 3):

"December 2, 1917: Stealing is rampant … One evening at 8 in Fürstenwald a couple of nationals invaded their house screaming, “Hands up!,” and Loewen had to give 800 rubles, the clock, shoes, and cap and ordered to keep quiet.

March 14, 1919: It is said the Bolsheviks took a great deal in Franzthal, including all flour, clothing, shoes, emptying all the drawers without even looking at it.

April 7, 1919: Received a letter from Richerts. They had to give up 400–500 ruble, his shoes, pants and smaller items.

June 9, Second Day of Pentecost, 1919: Nine Reds, including two women came at night. They behaved miserably. They insisted on more money and threatened to shoot me by pointing the revolver in my face and hit me with it, but not seriously. They searched around in the dark and took various items including shoes and other things we don’t know. 

November 1919: As I turned in at our gate, I met two Reds riding out. Among other things they had taken my last shoes. Now I had only the old felt boots I had worn on my trip. They were soaked through and the soles completely worn off. The peasants where I had stayed overnight with my wounded, had helped me to tie thin pieces of wood to the soles so that I would not have to completely walk in the mud with my sockless feet. So I got out an old pair of shoes, already thrown out, sat down with my tools and put patch on patch, so as to have something clean and dry to put on my feet.

December 5, 1919: [Peter Janzen and] I cut down a poplar out of the windbreak to use for wooden shoes."

Janzen’s diary from 1916 to 1925 mentions the making, resoling, patching and repairing of shoes 150 times—something he did as a sideline.

1920s: In October 1920 an American Mennonite relief worker visiting Halbstadt, Molotschna estimated that only “one child out of ten has anything looking like shoes” (note 4).

During the famine of 1921-22, Mennonites in North America gave generously. Holdeman Mennonites in Swalwell, Alberta and Mennonites from Drake, Saskatchewan, for example, joined Manitoba Mennonites to send 680 pounds of shoes, 150 pounds of soap, plus another 6,000 pounds of clothing for the relief effort in July 1922. Janzen wrote in his diary: “Susi received a nice blue dress from the Americans which she says is the best in Gnadenfeld. Tinke got an overcoat and good shoes although they are too tight. The others did not get much that was good.” (Note 5).

A report on refugees from Molotschna and Crimea stranded in the Black Sea port of Batum (Caucasus, 1922) states that “in the past three to six months during which most were out of work, one item of clothing or underwear after the next had to be sold. Some already have no shirt. Almost everyone has very bad shoes” (note 6).

1930s: At the height of Stalinist repression the need for footwear was just as real but the context was different. One memoir recalls women working on the collective farms arriving together with hoes over their shoulders, usually barefoot—though some had wooden shoes—each in a dress covered in patches (note 7; pic).


“After father's arrest, mother worked on the collective farm, and we children grazed cows, calves and pigs in summer. Since we had no proper shoes, we had to walk barefoot in the stubble fields and came home in the evening with bleeding feet and legs. In autumn these wounds would stick to the woolen socks and had to be torn loose. This was often painful, but there was no medicine and ointments in those days.”
(Note 8)

A mid-level worker on the collective farm earned between 200 and 250 rubles per years; a work outfit cost between 80 and 100 rubles, and a pair of shoes between 30 and 50 rubles (note 9).

My uncle Walter Bräul told me how he got a pair of shoes in 1938 when he was ten: "After father had been arrested in 1937, mother qualified for a one-time payment of 2,000 rubles for having seven children, with one under the age of five. ... She bought extra wheat and flour for her family, and then travelled with her cousin to the port city of Berdjansk where she bought coats and shoes for the children. At that point we were so poor that the children had no footwear."

1940s: With Nazi German military occupation, observers noted how poor, dull and unsightly children and youth were clothed for school with felted wool or straw shoes only (note 10). In a family photo in this time, one of Walter’s sisters had shoes, though they were too large, and the other two had none (pic).

Almost all ethnic Germans appear to have received supplies of linen, shoes, and clothing from Jews executed by the German military. On October 6, 1942, Reichsführer Heinirch Himmler sent a memo ordering depot items from the recently liquidated Jewish ghetto in Lublin and the concentration camp at Auschwitz be distributed for Christmas to all the major Volksdeutsche settlements; this included the Halbstadt district, which Himmler was scheduled to visit at the end of the month (note 11). On November 25, 1942, SS Oberführer Hoffmeyer confirmed the arrival of twenty-seven box cars of clothing items had arrived for the ethnic Germans for whom he had responsibility in South Ukraine (note 12). It was more than the Volksdeutsche could believe, even a decade later: “We were in dire need of clothing, yet even with that we were helped. The Germans in the Reich gathered many old clothes and sent them to us in Ukraine” (note 13).

In nearby Tokmak dozens of Jews were executed and buried in anti-tank trenches or ravine outside the town between 1941 and 1943. “With a few exceptions the bodies in the trenches were without clothing or shoes” (note 14). It is very likely that these shoes were redistributed to ethnic Germans. After a year of occupation, the regional official and chief administrator of the Molotschna Volksdeutsche Liaison Office (Mittelstelle) was not able to provide shoes and clothing: “[e]verything was lacking … We wanted to at least make wooden shoes. No wood to be had. Our German Red Cross nurses then wove some shoes out of corn straw” (note 15).

During the Trek out of the USSR in 1943 shoes continued to be thematic. Katie Peters in the Gnadenthal Trek group recalled how on the morning of November 10, 1943 everyone awoke to find that their world was covered in a blanket of ice and snow: “Still we moved forward, filled with fear of the Russians. Our clothes were wet, we had little, if anything, on our feet and we were always hungry” (note 16; pic).


“The roadways were a sea of mud. It is impossible to describe them and the hardships they caused to the trekkers. Often up to the axles in mud. The horses would slip and fall. ... We would push the wagon, walking deep in mud ourselves. Faces, hands, clothing, shoes—everything full of mud and wet. We were cold and wet, hungry and had little strength left. No men to help us ...”
(Note 17)

Once in German annexed Poland the refugees again received clothing and shoes:

“During a stay in the camp of several days, the personal registration, the creation of an identity card, a more detailed health examination, the settlement of money and foreign exchange issues are carried out and the most essential need for clothes and shoes is covered.” (Note 18)

The word Schuhe (shoes) is found 1,411 in the Mennonitische Rundschau, 1880 to 2006 (note 19). Those references to “shoes” as well as those above convince me that a Mennonite shoe display in Winnipeg or Abbotsford would open a world of stories.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Note 1: Cited in Peter M. Friesen, Mennonite Brotherhood in Russia, 1789–1910 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian, 1978) 112, https://archive.org/details/TheMennoniteBrotherhoodInRussia17891910/; (German original, p. 93, https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/pmfries1.pdf).

Note 2: Glenn H. Penner, trans., “Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for October 1802.” State Archives of Dnipro Region (DADO), Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 55. Notes by Richard D. Thiessen, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_October_1802.pdf; Richard D. Thiessen, trans., “Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for October 1810.” State Archives of Dnipro Region (DADO), Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 269, https://mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_October_1810.pdf; Richard D. Thiessen, trans., “Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for May 1811.” Archives of Dnipropetrovsk Region (SADR), Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 299. http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_May_1811.pdf; Richard D. Thiessen, trans., “Chortitza Mennonite Settlement Census for May 1816,” State Archives of Dnipro Region (DADO), Fond 134, Opis 1, Delo 498, http://www.mennonitegenealogy.com/russia/Chortitza_Mennonite_Settlement_Census_May_1816.pdf.

Note 3: Orie O. Miller, The Orie O. Miller Diary, 1920–1921 (Kitchener, ON: Pandora Press, 2018), 53.

Note 4: Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1916–1925,” translated by Edward Enns; entry for November 1919 from Jacob P. Janzen, “Diary 1911–1919 monthly summaries,” edited and translated by Katharina Wall Janzen. From Mennonite Heritage Centre, Winnipeg, MB, Jacob P. Janzen fonds, 1911–1946, vol. 5136 and 2341.

Note 5: "Kleider nach Rußland," Mennonitische Rundschau (September 6, 1922), 13. https://media.chortitza.org/pdf/lfrs189.pdf; Jacob P. Janzen, March 8, 1923, “Diary 1916-1925.”

Note 6: D. P. Neufeld (Reedley, CA) and J. P. Janzen (Sevastapol), “Die Mennonitische Flüchtlinge in Batum,” https://mla.bethelks.edu/archives/ms_6/076%20Colonization%20materials%201919-1925/pages/127.html.

Note 7: Cf. Eduard Allert (pseudonym for Eduard Reimer), “The Lost Generation,” in The Lost Generation and other Stories, edited by Gerhard Lohrenz, 9–128 (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1982), 32.

Note 8: Helene Dueck, Durch Trübsal und Not (Winnipeg, MB: Centre for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 1995), 29, https://archive.org/details/durch-truebsal-und-not/mode/2up.

Note 9: Cf. “Schönau (Zagradovka) Dorfbericht,” 268, and “Tiege (Zagradovka) Dorfbericht,” 290b, in “Village Reports Commando Dr. Stumpp,” Prepared for the German Reichsminister for the Occupied Eastern Territories, 1942. In Bundesarchiv Koblenz, BArch R6_GSK, files 620 to 633; 702 to 709. State Electronic Archive of Ukraine, https://tsdea.archives.gov.ua/deutsch/. A. A. Töws, Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 1 (Winnipeg, MB: Christian Press, 1949), 293.

Note 10: Karl Götz, in Gerhard Winter, ed., Die volksdeutsche Lehrerbildungsanstalt (LBA) zur Zeit der deutschen Besatzung Rußland (Wolfsburg: Self-published, 1988), 142.

Note 11: For details of memo by Himmler to S.S. Senior Group Leader Werner Lorenz and to Oswald Pohl, cf. Wendy Lower, Nazi Empire-Building and the Holocaust in Ukraine (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina, 2005), 267f., n.65.

Note 12: Cf. Peter Witte et al., eds., Der Dienstkalender Heinrich Himmlers 1941/42 (Hamburg: Christians Verlag, 1999), 603 n.100.

Note 13: Käthe Becker, in A. A. Töws, ed. Mennonitische Märtyrer der jüngsten Vergangenheit und der Gegenwart, vol. 2: Der große Leidensweg (North Clearbrook, BC: Self-published, 1954), 378.

Note 14: Yad Vashem World Holocaust Remembrance Centre, “Bolshoy Tokmak,” May 7, 1944. State Extraordinary Commission for the Determination and Investigation of Nazi and their Collaborators’ Atrocities in the USSR (ChGK); Yad Vashem Archives, JM/19707; GARF 7021-61-29, https://www.yadvashem.org/untoldstories/database/chgkSovietReports.asp?cid=563&site_id=705; “Soviet Report about the mass murder of Jews in Molochansk,” Yad Vashem Archives, M.37/293; TsGAOOu 57-4-14, https://www.yadvashem.org/untoldstories/database/index.asp?cid=568.

Note 15: Hermann Roßner, in Horst Gerlach, “Mennonites, the Molotschna, and the Volksdeutsche Mittelstelle in the Second World War,” translated by John D. Thiesen, Mennonite Life 41, no. 3 (1986), 6, https://mla.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/pre2000/1986sep.pdf.

Note 16: Katie Friesen, Into the Unknown (Steinbach, MB: Self-published, 1986), 66.

Note 17: Dueck, Durch Trübsal und Not, 65.

Note 18: SS Standartenführer Herbert Hübner, “Schwarzmeerdeutsche kehren heim,” Ostdeutscher Beobachter 6, no. 34 (February 4, 1944), 3, https://www.wbc.poznan.pl/dlibra/publication/125675/edition/134951/content.

Note 19: Search results in the Mennonitische Rundschau for “Schuhe,” https://archive.org/details/pub_die-mennonitische-rundschau?query=schuhe&sin=TXT&sort=date.

Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Formidable Fräulein Marga Bräul (1919–2011)

Fräulein Bräul left an indelible mark on two generations of high school students in the Mennonite Colony of Fernheim, Paraguay. Former students and acquaintances recall that Marga Bräul demanded the highest effort and achievements of her students, colleagues and of herself—the kind of teacher you either love or hate but will never forget! In March 1947, Marga was offered a position at the Fernheim Secondary School ( Zentralschule ). A recent refugee to Paraguay from war-torn Europe, she taught mathematics, physics, and chemistry. In 1952, she was the only female faculty member ( note 1 ). Marga wedded a strong commitment to academics with a passion for quality arts and crafts. She provided extensive extra-curricular instruction to students in handiwork and was especially renowned for her artwork—which included painting and woodworking— end of year art exhibits with students, theatre sets, and festival decorations. Marga’s pedagogical philosophy was holistic; she told Mennonite ed...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Flooding as a weapon of war, 1657

If a picture is worth a thousand words, then these maps speak volumes. In February 1657, the Swedish King Carolus Gustavus ordered an intentional breach of the embankments along the Vistula River to completely flood the villages of the Danzig Werder. See the vivid punctures and water flow in 1657 map below; compare with the 1730 maps with rebuilt villages and farms ( note 1 ). In Polish memory this war is appropriately remembered as "The Deluge". Villages in the Danzig Werder (delta) from which Mennonites immigrated to Russia include: Quadendorf, Reichenberg, Krampitz, Neunhuben, Hochzeit, Scharfenberg, Wotzlaff, Landau, Schönau, Nassenhuben, Mönchengrebin, and Nobel ( note 2 ). In the war the suburbs outside the gates of Danzig suffered most; Mennonites lived here in large numbers, e.g., in Alt Schottland and Stoltzenberg. First, these villages were completely razed by the City of Danzig to keep the invading Swedes from using the villages to their advantage in battle. ...

Mennonite “Displaced Persons” and MCC’s “Jewish Argument”

At the conclusion of the war Mennonite Central Committee (MCC) was fully aware that “their” 13,000-plus Russian Mennonite refugees in Germany did not qualify as displaced persons and for support from the International Refugee Organization. They were refused IRO “care and maintenance” as Soviet citizens, i.e., they were free to return home. MCC sought to convince the IRO that the Mennonite refugees were not “Soviet Germans” and--if they had became German citizens in Warthegau (also a disqualifier), it was done under duress ( note 1 ). Astonishingly MCC’s Europe Director Peter J. Dyck—later seen as the Moses of the Mennonites—proposed to top military personnel at US military headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany (USFET) in July 1946, that Mennonites be granted the same status as Jews as a persecuted people. “By a recent decree all Jews, regardless of their nationality, are automatically given the status of 'D.P.' [displaced person] on the grounds that they are victims of persecu...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

1929 Flight of Mennonites to Moscow and Reception in Germany

At the core of the attached video are some thirty photos of Mennonite refugees arriving from Moscow in 1929 which are new archival finds. While some 13,000 had gathered in outskirts of Moscow, with many more attempting the same journey, the Soviet Union only released 3,885 Mennonite "German farmers," together with 1,260 Lutherans, 468 Catholics, 51 Baptists, and 7 Adventists. Some of new photographs are from the first group of 323 refugees who left Moscow on October 29, arriving in Kiel on November 3, 1929. A second group of photos are from the so-called “Swinemünde group,” which left Moscow only a day later. This group however could not be accommodated in the first transport and departed from a different station on October 31. They were however held up in Leningrad for one month as intense diplomatic negotiations between the Soviet Union, Germany and also Canada took place. This second group arrived at the Prussian sea port of Swinemünde on December 2. In the next ten ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...