Skip to main content

Why Danzig and Poland?

In the late 16th century, Poland became a haven for a variety of non-conformists which included Jews, Anti-Trinitarians from Italy and Bohemia, Quakers and Calvinists from Great Britain, south German Schwenkfelders, Eastern Orthodox, Armenian, and Greek Catholic Christians, some Muslim Tatars, as well as other peaceful sectarians like the Dutch and Flemish Anabaptists.

Unlike the Low Countries and most of western Europe, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth was a “state without stakes,” and as such fittingly described as “God’s playground” (note 1). In the view of 17th-century Dutch dramatist Joost van den Vondel, it was “the ‘Promised Land,’ where the refugee could forget all his sorrow and enjoy the richness of the land” (note 2). Over the next two centuries an important strand of Mennonite life and spirituality evolved into a mature tradition in this relatively hospitable context (note 3).

Anabaptists from the Low Countries began to arrive in Danzig and region as early as 1530. Like Bruges, for example (where some of our Mennonite ancestors originated), Danzig was a trading centre of the Hanseatic League, which stretched from London to Norway, with Middle Low German as the dominant language of trade. Whereas Bruges was a major source of cloth and other manufactured goods, the port city of Danzig with a population of 50,000 was a shipbuilding centre and main outlet for Polish grain and other commodities.

As Danzig embraced the Lutheran Reformation, Anabaptists from the Low Countries found both religious freedom and economic opportunity there. Here too they could maintain strong ties to their churches of origin with the arrival of more than a thousand Dutch ships annually (ca. 2.7 per day; note 4). Menno Simons visited his small flock scattered in Danzig and Elbing ca. 1549 (note 5); Anabaptist leader Dirk Philips became Danzig’s first elder, settling outside the city walls in Alt-Schottland in the mid-1550s; Leenaert Bouwens who had baptized thousands in Flanders visited Danzig in 1563—only to be disposed by Dirk Philips two years later in dispute.

Between 1527 and 1578, approximately 750 families from the Low Countries—mostly Mennonite refugees and settlers—had moved to Danzig and the Vistula Delta, with some arriving directly from Flanders over Cologne (note 6).

Most of the culturally Flemish refugees from the southern Low Countries cities like Bruges or Brussels--with Flemish names like Penner, Buller, Wall, Fast, etc.--“were engaged in commercial activities. Since they initially had difficulties in obtaining commercial licenses (Gewerbezulassungen) in Danzig and Elbing, some migrated to agricultural occupations” (note 7). Their successes opened the door for other Anabaptist refugees from the Low Countries. In 1562 “Dutch people of the Mennonite religion” were specifically invited by the Polish banking house Loysen to settle on the “Tiegenhoff part of the Vistula Delta” to rebuild dikes partially destroyed by previous wars and to drain low-lying lagoons and swamps over large blocks of land (note 8). That story is more familiar and frequently retold. The land had to be dried, cleared and strategically sloped to control water run-off and to protect from flooding. Because of the enormous labour required with little capital for construction and the danger of swamp fever, up to eighty percent of the first settlers died prematurely. In some places it took a century—three generations—to create a stable or fruitful agricultural region and, of necessity, a sense of community.

By 1580 there are 5 congregational groups: Danzig, Elbing, Montau, Thorn, Kleines Werder. The Gross-Werder (Large Vistula Delta) groups belonged to either Danzig or Elbing. Each understood itself to be subordinate to the mother churches in “the west” (note 9). The division between the “Frisians” and “Flemish” groups--no longer geographical or cultural designations, but ecclesiological--had not yet set in.

The region was uniquely fertile, as one Scottish traveler noted in 1593, and wealthy in commodities, including its “great quantity of wax, flax, linen clothes … soap-ashes, and all kind of grains, especially rye, which has made Danzig famous, for relieving all nations therewith in time of dearth” (note 10).

A British document on Poland from 1598 notes that this land has “wonderfull nombers of heretikes” including a “greate stoare of Anabaptistes,” and “all sortes of Antitrinitaries” (note 11). Though a strongly Catholic territory, Poland’s King Sigismund II Augustus adopted a tolerant attitude toward the Reformation, formalized with the Confederation of Warsaw in 1573:

“Whereas in our Common Wealth there is no small disagreement in the matter of the Christian faith … we will keep the peace among ourselves, and that we will not, for the sake of our various faith and difference of church, either shed blood or confiscate property, deny favour, imprison or banish.” (Note 12)

Despite occasional repressions and in contrast to almost every other area of Europe, there were no mass religious persecutions carried out by authorities in Poland in the 17th century (note 13). Danzig/Poland was a tolerant context that offered Mennonites security of life and property, together with the freedoms to practice their faith without the obligations of military service, and to develop a tradition.

Some two-hundred years later the first migrations to Russia would begin.

            ---Arnold Neufeldt-Fast

---Notes---

Pic: 1595 Map of “Prussia,” Atlas sive cosmographica, by Gerardus Mercator, https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbc0001.2003rosen0730/?sp=96.

Pic: 1687 Map of Danzig, https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Mapa_Gda%C5%84ska_1687.jpg.

Note 1: Cf. Norman Davies, God’s Playground: A History of Poland, vol. 1: The Origins to 1795, 2nd ed. (Oxford: University of Oxford Press, 2005); Janusz Tazbir, A State without Stakes. Polish Religious Toleration in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (New York: Kościuszko Foundation, 1973); Maria Bogucka, “Religiöse Koexistenz—Ausdruck von Toleranz oder von politischer Berechnung? Der Fall Danzig im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert,” in Konfessionelle Pluralität als Herausforderung: Koexistenz und Konflikt im Spätmittelalter und Früher Neuzeit, edited by J. Bahlcke et al., 521–532 (Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag, 2006).

Note 2: Cf. Willem Stuve, “Affirming the Old Fundamentals. A Survey of the Danzig Old-Flemish Congregations in the Netherlands,” Preservings no. 25 (December 2005), 33, https://www.plettfoundation.org/files/preservings/Preservings25.pdf; also Peter J. Klassen, Mennonites in Early Modern Poland and Prussia (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), 1f.

Note 3: See Reinhold Curicken, Der Stadt Dantzig: Historische Beschreibung (Amsterdam/ Dantzigk: Janssons, 1687), https://pbc.gda.pl/dlibra/publication/61987/edition/55645/content.

Note 4: See Maria Bogucka, “Amsterdam and the Baltic in the First Half of the Seventeenth Century,” The Economic History Review 26, no. 3 (1973), 433–447.

Note 5: Cf. also Menno’s “Exhortation to a Church in Prussia, 1549,” in J. C. Wenger, ed., The Complete Writings of Menno Simons (Scottdale, PA: Herald Press, 1984 ), 1030–1035. https://archive.org/search.php?query=menno+simons&sin=.

Note 6: Cf. Cornelius Krahn, Dutch Anabaptism: Origin, Spread, Life and Thought, 1450–1600 (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1968), 219f., https://archive.org/details/dutchanabaptismo0000krah.

Note 7: Based on Horst Quiring’s work on names in the earliest correspondence: “Die Danziger Mennoniten: Der Stand der Herkunftsfragen,” in A Legacy of Faith: The Heritage of Menno Simons, edited by Cornelius J. Dyck, 192–196 (Newton, KS: Faith and Life, 1962), https://archive.org/details/legacyoffaithher00unse; idem, “Aus den ersten Jahrzehnten der Mennoniten in Westpreußen,” Mennonitische Geschichtsblätter 2 (1937), 32–35, https://mla.bethelks.edu/gmsources/newspapers/Mennonitische%20Geschichtsblaetter/1936-1940/DSCF4464.JPG (ff.).

Note 8: For this early period, cf. P. Klassen, Mennonites in Early Modern Poland and Prussia; also idem, A Homeland for Strangers. An Introduction to Mennonites in Poland and Prussia, rev’d ed. (Fresno, CA: Centre for Mennonite Brethren Studies, 1989), https://archive.org/details/ahomeland-for-strangers-an-introduction-to-mennonites-in-poland-and-prussia-revised-ocr.

Note 9: Quiring, “Aus den ersten Jahrzehnten der Mennoniten in Westpreußen,” 34.

Note 10: Itinerary of Fynes Moryson, vol. 4 (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1908), 69f. (lightly edited), https://archive.org/details/itinerarycontain04moryuoft/page/68. See also observations from 1615 in William Lithgow, Totall Discourse of the Rare adventures & Painefull Peregrinations (Glasgow: MacLehose, 1906), 368, https://archive.org/details/totalldiscourseo00lithuoft/.

Note 11: “Relation of the State of Polonia and the United Provinces” (unknown author), cited in Peter P. Bajer, Scots in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, 16th–18th Centuries: The Formation and Disappearance of an Ethnic Group (Boston: Brill, 2012), 70.

Note 12: Cited in Bajer, Scots in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, 71, no. 108.

Note 13: Bajer, Scots in the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, 231.






Print Friendly and PDF

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The End of Schardau (and other Molotschna villages), 1941

My grandmother was four-years old when her parents moved from Petershagen, Molotschna to Schardau in 1908. This story is larger than that of Schardau, but tells how this village and many others in Molotschna were evacuated by Stalin days before the arrival of German troops in 1941. -ANF The bridge across the Dnieper at Chortitza was destroyed by retreating Soviet troops on August 18, 1941 and the hydroelectric dam completed near Einlage in 1932 was also dynamited by NKVD personnel—killing at least 20,000 locals downstream, and forcing the Germans to cross further south at Nikopol. For the next six-and-a-half weeks, the old Mennonite settlement area of Chortitza was continuously shelled by Soviet troops from Zaporozhje on the east side of the river ( note 1 ). The majority of Russian Germans in Crimea and Ukraine paid dearly for Germany’s Blitzkrieg and plans for racially-based population resettlements. As early as August 3, 1941, the Supreme Command of the Soviet Forces received noti...

“The way is finally open”—Russian Mennonite Immigration, 1922-23

In a highly secretive meeting in Ohrloff, Molotschna on February 7, 1922, leaders took a decision to work to remove the entire Mennonite population of some 100,000 people out of the USSR—if at all possible ( note 1 ). B.B. Janz (Ohrloff) and Bishop David Toews (Rosthern, SK) are remembered as the immigration leaders who made it possible to bring some 20,000 Mennonites from the Soviet Union to Canada in the 1920s ( note 2 ). But behind those final numbers were multiple problems. In August 1922, an appeal was made by leaders to churches in Canada and the USA: “The way is finally open, for at least 3,000 persons who have received permission to leave Russia … Two ships of the Canadian Pacific Railway are ready to sail from England to Odessa as soon as the cholera quarantine is lifted. These Russian [Mennonite] refugees are practically without clothing … .” ( Note 3 ) Notably at this point B. B. Janz was also writing Toews, saying that he was utterly exhausted and was preparing to ...

Mennonites in Danzig's Suburbs: Maps and Illustrations

Mennonites first settled in the Danzig suburb of Schottland (lit: "Scotland"; “Stare-Szkoty”; also “Alt-Schottland”) in the mid-1500s. “Danzig” is the oldest and most important Mennonite congregation in Prussia. Menno Simons visited Schottland and Dirk Phillips was its first elder and lived here for a time. Two centuries later the number of families from the suburbs of Danzig that immigrated to Russia was not large: Stolzenberg 5, Schidlitz 3, Alt-Schottland 2, Ohra 1, Langfuhr 1, Emaus 1, Nobel 1, and Krampetz 2 ( map 1 ). However most Russian Mennonites had at least some connection to the Danzig church—whether Frisian or Flemish—if not in the 1700s, then in 1600s. Map 2  is from 1615; a larger number of Mennonites had been in Schottland at this point for more than four decades. Its buildings are not rural but look very Dutch urban/suburban in style. These were weavers, merchants and craftsmen, and since the 17th century they lived side-by-side with a larger number of Jews a...

On Becoming the Quiet in the Land

They are fair questions: “What happened to the firebrands of the Reformation? How did the movement become so withdrawn--even "dour and unexciting,” according to one historian? Mennonites originally referred to themselves as the “quiet in the land” in contrast to the militant--definitely more exciting--militant revolutionaries of Münster ( note 1 ), and identification with Psalm 35:19f.: “Let not my enemies gloat over me … For they do not speak peace, but they devise deceitful schemes against those who live quietly in the land.” How did Mennonites become the “quiet in the land” in Royal Prussia? Minority non-citizen groups in Poland like Jews, Scots, Huguenots or the much smaller body of Mennonites did not enjoy full political or economic rights as citizens. Ecclesial and civil laws left linguistic or religious minorities vulnerable to extortion. Such groups sought to negotiate a Privilegium or charter with the king, which set out a legal basis for some protections of life an...

Sesquicentennial: Proclamation of Universal Military Service Manifesto, January 1, 1874

One-hundred-and-fifty years ago Tsar Alexander II proclaimed a new universal military service requirement into law, which—despite the promises of his predecesors—included Russia’s Mennonites. This act fundamentally changed the course of the Russian Mennonite story, and resulted in the emigration of some 17,000 Mennonites. The Russian government’s intentions in this regard were first reported in newspapers in November 1870 ( note 1 ) and later confirmed by Senator Evgenii von Hahn, former President of the Guardianship Committee ( note 2 ). Some Russian Mennonite leaders were soon corresponding with American counterparts on the possibility of mass migration ( note 3 ). Despite painful internal differences in the Mennonite community, between 1871 and Fall 1873 they put up a united front with five joint delegations to St. Petersburg and Yalta to petition for a Mennonite exemption. While the delegations were well received and some options could be discussed with ministers of the Crown, ...

Mennonite-Designed Mosque on the Molotschna

The “Peter J. Braun Archive" is a mammoth 78 reel microfilm collection of Russian Mennonite materials from 1803 to 1920 -- and largely still untapped by researchers ( note 1 ). In the files of Philipp Wiebe, son-in-law and heir to Johann Cornies, is a blueprint for a mosque ( pic ) as well as another file entitled “Akkerman Mosque Construction Accounts, 1850-1859” ( note 2 ). The Molotschna Mennonites were settlers on traditional Nogai lands; their Nogai neighbours were a nomadic, Muslim Tartar group. In 1825, Cornies wrote a significant anthropological report on the Nogai at the request of the Guardianship Committee, based largely on his engagements with these neighbours on Molotschna’s southern border ( note 3 ). Building upon these experiences and relationships, in 1835 Cornies founded the Nogai agricultural colony “Akkerman” outside the southern border of the Molotschna Colony. Akkerman was a projection of Cornies’ ideal Mennonite village outlined in exacting detail, with un...

The Tinkelstein Family of Chortitza-Rosenthal (Ukraine)

Chortitza was the first Mennonite settlement in "New Russia" (later Ukraine), est. 1789. The last Mennonites left in 1943 ( note 1 ). During the Stalin years in Ukraine (after 1928), marriage with Jewish neighbours—especially among better educated Mennonites in cities—had become somewhat more common. When the Germans arrived mid-August 1941, however, it meant certain death for the Jewish partner and usually for the children of those marriages. A family friend, Peter Harder, died in 2022 at age 96. Peter was born in Osterwick to a teacher and grew up in Chortitza. As a 16-year-old in 1942, Peter was compelled by occupying German forces to participate in the war effort. Ukrainians and Russians (prisoners of war?) were used by the Germans to rebuild the massive dam at Einlage near Zaporizhzhia, and Peter was engaged as a translator. In the next year he changed focus and started teachers college, which included significant Nazi indoctrination. In 2017 I interviewed Peter Ha...

Fraktur (or Gothic) font and Kurrent- (or Sütterlin) handwriting: Nazi ban, 1941

In the middle of the war on January 1, 1942, the Winnipeg-based Mennonitische Rundschau published a new issue without the familiar Fraktur script masthead ( note 1 ). One might speculate on the reasons, but a year earlier Hitler banned the use of the font in the Reich . The Rundschau did not exactly follow all orders from Berlin—the rest of the paper was in Fraktur (sometimes referred to as "Gothic"); when the war ended in 1945, the Rundschau reintroduced the Fraktur font for its masthead. It wasn’t until the 1960s that an issue might have a page or title here or there with the “normal” or Latin font, even though post-war Germany was no longer using Fraktur . By 1973 only the Rundschau masthead is left in Fraktur , and that is only removed in December 1992. Attached is a copy of Nazi Party Secretary Martin Bormann's official letter dated January 3, 1941, which prohibited the use of Fraktur fonts "by order of the Führer. " Why? It was a Jewish invention, apparent...

School Reports, 1890s

Mennonite memoirs typically paint a golden picture of schools in the so-called “golden era” of Mennonite life in Russia. The official “Reports on Molotschna Schools: 1895/96 and 1897/98,” however, give us a more lackluster and realistic picture ( note 1 ). What do we learn from these reports? Many schools had minor infractions—the furniture did not correspond to requirements, there were insufficient book cabinets, or the desks and benches were too old and in need of repair. The Mennonite schoolhouses in Halbstadt and Rudnerweide—once recognized as leading and exceptional—together with schools in Friedensruh, Fürstenwerder, Franzthal, and Blumstein were deemed to be “in an unsatisfactory state.” In other cases a new roof and new steps were needed, or the rooms too were too small, too dark, too cramped, or with moist walls. More seriously in some villages—Waldheim, Schönsee, Fabrikerwiese, and even Gnadenfeld, well-known for its educational past—inspectors recorded that pupils “do not ...

What is the Church to Say? Letter 4 (of 4) to American Mennonite Friends

Irony is used in this post to provoke and invite critical thought; the historical research on the Mennonite experience is accurate and carefully considered. ~ANF Preparing for your next AGM: Mennonite Congregations and Deportations Many U.S. Mennonite pastors voted for Donald Trump, whose signature promise was an immediate start to “the largest deportation operation in American history.” Confirmed this week, President Trump will declare a national emergency and deploy military assets to carry this out. The timing is ideal; in January many Mennonite congregations have their Annual General Meeting (AGM) with opportunity to review and update the bylaws of their constitution. Need help? We have related examples from our tradition, which I offer as a template, together with a few red flags. First, your congregational by-laws.  It is unlikely you have undocumented immigrants in your congregation, but you should flag this. Model: Gustav Reimer, a deacon and notary public from the ...